对《中国日报》与《纽约时报》关于阿里巴巴上市报道的批评话语分析
发布时间：2019-02-19 16:12
【摘要】：批评话语分析注重将语篇的语言特点与其文化,社会背景等相结合来研究语篇含义,从而揭露作者的态度及隐含在语篇中的意识形态。新闻语篇看似客观,然而其受作者态度,意识和社会背景等影响,新闻语篇并不能公正地表达新闻事件。本文从《中国日报》和《纽约时报》中各选取六篇有关阿里巴巴上市的新闻报道做对比分析,以费尔克劳的三维理论模型和韩礼德的系统功能语言学为理论基础,研究《中国日报》和《纽约时报》对阿里巴巴上市事件所持态度及观点。依据费尔克劳的三维理论模型,作者分别从描述层面,阐释层面及说明层面展开分析。在描述层面,从及物性系统和词汇选择方向,研究两家媒体各自的语言特点;在阐释层面,以情态系统为主要研究方向,研究《中国日报》和《纽约时报》记者在使用直接引语、间接引语及情态词方面的差异;在说明层面,对新闻报道从社会语境,政治语境和经济语境进行研究,解释造成隐含在报导中的态度及意识形态差别的原因。本文研究发现如下:首先,在描述层面,《中国日报》更多地使用支持、赞扬的词汇描述阿里巴巴上市事件,而《纽约时报》则运用反对、贬义的词汇。其次,在阐释层面,《中国日报》多运用直接引语,而《纽约时报》则大量地使用间接引语,这体现了《中国日报》更加客观地报道阿里巴巴上市事件。再次,在说明层面,《中国日报》新闻语篇体现了报道者对中国企业及中国经济充满信心,《纽约时报》报道者则不信任中国企业,且担心中国经济的发展会对美国经济构成威胁。最后,两家新闻报社在阿里巴巴上市新闻报道中运用及物性系统、词汇选择、和情态系统等方面存在完全相反的态度,《中国日报》对阿里巴巴上市持支持、乐观态度,《纽约时报》对阿里巴巴上市持怀疑,反对态度。
[Abstract]:Critical discourse analysis focuses on combining the linguistic characteristics of the discourse with its cultural and social background to study the meaning of the text so as to reveal the author's attitude and the ideology implied in the discourse. News discourse seems objective, but it is influenced by the author's attitude, consciousness and social background. News discourse can not express news events fairly. This paper selects six news reports about Alibaba's listing in China Daily and the New York Times for comparative analysis, based on the three dimensional theoretical model of Falcrow and Halliday's systemic functional linguistics. To study the attitudes and views of the China Daily and the New York Times on Alibaba's listing. According to the three-dimensional theoretical model of Falcrow, the author analyzes it from the description level, the interpretation level and the illustrative level. At the level of description, the linguistic characteristics of the two media are studied from the perspective of transitivity system and lexical choice. At the level of interpretation, this paper studies the differences in the use of direct, indirect and modal words between the reporters of China Daily and the New York Times, taking the modality system as the main research direction. At the level of explanation, this paper studies the social context, political context and economic context of news reports, and explains the reasons for the differences of attitudes and ideologies implied in the reports. The main findings of this paper are as follows: first of all, in the descriptive level, the "China Daily" uses more words of support and praise to describe the listing of Alibaba, while the New York Times uses dissenting and derogatory words. Secondly, in terms of interpretation, the China Daily mostly uses direct quotations, while the New York Times uses a large number of indirect quotations, which shows that the China Daily reports more objectively the listing of Alibaba. Thirdly, at the illustrative level, the China Daily news discourse shows that the reporter is full of confidence in Chinese enterprises and the Chinese economy, while the New York Times reporters do not trust Chinese enterprises. And worry that China's economic development will pose a threat to the U. S. economy. Finally, the two news newspapers have completely opposite attitudes in the aspects of the material system, vocabulary selection, and modality system used in Alibaba's listed news reports. The "China Daily" supports and is optimistic about Alibaba's listing. The New York Times is skeptical and opposed to Alibaba's listing.
【学位授予单位】：鲁东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H315;H15
，
本文编号：2426659
[Abstract]:Critical discourse analysis focuses on combining the linguistic characteristics of the discourse with its cultural and social background to study the meaning of the text so as to reveal the author's attitude and the ideology implied in the discourse. News discourse seems objective, but it is influenced by the author's attitude, consciousness and social background. News discourse can not express news events fairly. This paper selects six news reports about Alibaba's listing in China Daily and the New York Times for comparative analysis, based on the three dimensional theoretical model of Falcrow and Halliday's systemic functional linguistics. To study the attitudes and views of the China Daily and the New York Times on Alibaba's listing. According to the three-dimensional theoretical model of Falcrow, the author analyzes it from the description level, the interpretation level and the illustrative level. At the level of description, the linguistic characteristics of the two media are studied from the perspective of transitivity system and lexical choice. At the level of interpretation, this paper studies the differences in the use of direct, indirect and modal words between the reporters of China Daily and the New York Times, taking the modality system as the main research direction. At the level of explanation, this paper studies the social context, political context and economic context of news reports, and explains the reasons for the differences of attitudes and ideologies implied in the reports. The main findings of this paper are as follows: first of all, in the descriptive level, the "China Daily" uses more words of support and praise to describe the listing of Alibaba, while the New York Times uses dissenting and derogatory words. Secondly, in terms of interpretation, the China Daily mostly uses direct quotations, while the New York Times uses a large number of indirect quotations, which shows that the China Daily reports more objectively the listing of Alibaba. Thirdly, at the illustrative level, the China Daily news discourse shows that the reporter is full of confidence in Chinese enterprises and the Chinese economy, while the New York Times reporters do not trust Chinese enterprises. And worry that China's economic development will pose a threat to the U. S. economy. Finally, the two news newspapers have completely opposite attitudes in the aspects of the material system, vocabulary selection, and modality system used in Alibaba's listed news reports. The "China Daily" supports and is optimistic about Alibaba's listing. The New York Times is skeptical and opposed to Alibaba's listing.
【学位授予单位】：鲁东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：H315;H15
，
本文编号：2426659
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/yuyanyishu/2426659.html
