伪证:见证叙事的伦理问题

发布时间：2018-02-01 22:50

本文关键词： 见证叙事伪证证据学文学伦理学　出处：《外国文学研究》2016年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：从叙事视角来看,见证叙事有两种形式。在单一视角的见证叙事中,见证人提供的大都是孤证,局外人和旁观者很难考证其真实性。在多重视角的见证叙事中,见证人提供的证词可能相互印证,也可能陷入罗生门式的证据陷阱。这就使见证叙事陷入了"见证的危机"。威尔科米尔斯基造假事件,以一种极端的方式,反证了见证人的伦理身份不容僭越。见证叙事的"罗生门",这个证据学中最为纠结的"戈尔迪之结",恰恰归结为一个伦理结。这表明,"见证的危机",其实是伦理的危机。为什么不能作伪证?如何走出见证的危机?文学伦理学批评理论与术语的建构,为回答这些问题提供了钥匙。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of narrative, witness narration has two forms. In the witness narrative of a single perspective, most of the witnesses provide solitary evidence, and it is difficult for outsiders and bystanders to verify its authenticity. The testimonies of the witnesses may be corroborated by each other, or they may fall into the Roxomen evidence trap. This leads the witness narrative into a "witness crisis." Wilkomirski's falsification, in an extreme way. In contrast, it proves that the ethical identity of the witness cannot be overtaken. "Luo Shengmen", the most entangled "Goldie's knot" in evidential science, is precisely an ethical knot, which shows that "the crisis of witness". It's actually an ethical crisis. Why not perjury? How to get out of the crisis witnessed? The construction of literary ethics criticism theory and terminology provides the key to answer these questions.
【作者单位】：三峡大学文学与传媒学院;
【基金】：作者主持的国家社科基金项目“文学记忆史:理论与实践”【项目批号:11CZW002】的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I106
【正文快照】： 正如纳粹大屠杀的幸存者、1986年诺贝尔和平奖获得者艾利·威塞尔所说:“如果说希腊人创造了悲剧,罗马人创造了书信体,文艺复兴时期创造了十四行诗,我们的时代则创造了一种新的文体——见证文学”(Wiesel,“The Holocaust as Literary Inspiration”9)。见证文学的兴起,有力地

【相似文献】