过度想象与意义的困顿

发布时间：2018-03-14 08:36

  本文选题：过度阐释　切入点：《达·芬奇密码》　出处：《社会科学战线》2017年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：艾柯"丹诺讲座"反对"过度阐释",呼吁回归久被忽略的作者意图和写作语境。然布朗《达·芬奇密码》中抹大拉的马利亚这类线索,见证了小说家阐释历史,想象力诡谲离奇可以远超过批评家阐释小说。乔纳森·卡勒重申意义出自语境,但是语境推陈出新,没有边际。这实际上已经超越了德里达《签名事件语境》一文中的意义解读语境。由此来读霍桑小说《红字》这部近年被"情感理论"关注有加的经典文本,劳伦·贝兰特不遗余力地解剖国家意识形态机器如何粗暴介入小说人物的情感世界,同样演绎了经典阐释语境不断更新的精彩案例。或如从伪狄奥尼修、库萨的尼古拉、埃克哈特大师,到海德格尔和德里达的"否定神学"理路,梳理意义的脉络,说它是什么,常常反不如说它不是什么来得更要清楚。
[Abstract]:Eco's Dano Lecture opposes "overinterpretation," calling for a return to the long-neglected author's intentions and writing context. But clues like Mary Magdalene in Brown's Da Vinci Code bear witness to the novelist's interpretation of history. The imagination is so strange that it can be interpreted far more than a critic can. Jonason Keller reiterates that meaning comes from context, but context brings forth new things. There is no margin. This has actually gone beyond the meaning of the context in Derrida's "context of signature events", and thus read Hawthorne's novel, the Scarlet letter, a classic text that has recently been the subject of "emotional theory". Lauren Belland spared no effort in dissecting how the nation's ideological machine brutally intervened in the emotional world of the characters, as well as a fascinating case of the renewal of the classic explanatory context. Or from pseudo-Dionysus, Nicholas of Kusa. Master Eckhardt, to Heidegger and Derrida's "negation theology" rationales, combs the context of meaning, saying what it is, often rather than what it does not come more clearly.
【作者单位】： 复旦大学中文系;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目(14AZD099)
【分类号】：I712.074
，

本文编号：1610433