詹姆逊的“社会形式诗学”及其评价
发布时间：2019-01-01 15:45
【摘要】：詹姆逊文化批评要"永远历史化":首先要发掘"缺场的原因",然后再纳入社会的视域,最后进入最广泛意义的历史领域,也就是文本变成社会文本的过程。社会形式诗学的理论有多个理论来源,"社会形式诗学论"是詹姆逊作为新马克思主义者的重要理论创新。但社会形式诗学具有明显的理论缺陷:许多概念范畴混杂,意义不够清晰;历史与文本的关系具有黑格尔的影子;批评过于政治化,以至于损害了文学批评应该有的审美性等等。
[Abstract]:Jameson's cultural criticism should be "forever historical": first of all, we should explore the "reasons of lack of field", then bring it into the social field of view, and finally enter the most extensive historical field, that is, the process of the text becoming a social text. The theory of social form poetics has many theoretical sources. "the theory of social form poetics" is Jameson's important theoretical innovation as a new Marxist. But social formal poetics has obvious theoretical defects: many concept categories are mixed, meaning is not clear enough, the relationship between history and text has the shadow of Hegel. Criticism is so politicized that it damages the aesthetic nature of literary criticism.
【作者单位】： 北京大学马克思主义学院;天津商业大学外国语学院;
【基金】：天津哲学社会科学规划项目“霍尔的文化政治研究”(TJWW161024)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I712.06
，
本文编号：2397764
[Abstract]:Jameson's cultural criticism should be "forever historical": first of all, we should explore the "reasons of lack of field", then bring it into the social field of view, and finally enter the most extensive historical field, that is, the process of the text becoming a social text. The theory of social form poetics has many theoretical sources. "the theory of social form poetics" is Jameson's important theoretical innovation as a new Marxist. But social formal poetics has obvious theoretical defects: many concept categories are mixed, meaning is not clear enough, the relationship between history and text has the shadow of Hegel. Criticism is so politicized that it damages the aesthetic nature of literary criticism.
【作者单位】： 北京大学马克思主义学院;天津商业大学外国语学院;
【基金】：天津哲学社会科学规划项目“霍尔的文化政治研究”(TJWW161024)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：I712.06
，
本文编号：2397764
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xiandaiwenxuelunwen/2397764.html
