学术的环流:叙事、地方知识与主体性——对一场学术讨论的学理反思

发布时间：2018-02-26 12:15

  本文关键词： 叙事性研究 环流 人文性 地方知识 主体性　出处：《新闻与传播研究》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：从一场关于"讲故事"论文的合法性讨论,可以窥视传播学学科内部两种诠释社群——诠释主义与实证主义的范式差异。叙事性研究强调叙事作为人类经验的核心,在某种程度上溢出了传统质性研究及民族志的框架,表现出更为激进的文化态度,因此需要学术社群进一步反思辨析建立基本共识。它指向的地方知识的生产既是诠释多重现实的意义之网的必经之路,也是知识生产者在学术及文化上寻求双重主体性的结果。叙事性研究方法在传播学学科的应用,人文性传统对主流实证主义范式的反拨,都是一种打破学术内眷性的学术"环流"。
[Abstract]:From a discussion on the legitimacy of "storytelling", we can see the paradigm difference between hermeneutics and positivism in two kinds of hermeneutics within the discipline of communication. Narrative studies emphasize narrative as the core of human experience. To some extent, it overflows the framework of traditional qualitative research and ethnography, showing a more radical cultural attitude. Therefore, it is necessary for the academic community to further reflect on discrimination and build a basic consensus. The production of local knowledge that it points to is the only way to interpret the network of meanings of multiple realities. It is also the result of the knowledge producers seeking the dual subjectivity in the academic and cultural aspects. The application of narrative research methods in the communication science, the reversal of the mainstream positivist paradigm by the humanism tradition, is also the result of the knowledge producers seeking for the dual subjectivity in the academic and cultural fields. It is a kind of academic circulation which breaks the internal academic attention.
【作者单位】： 南京大学新闻传播学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“基于社交网络的青年群体日常社会-文化实践研究”(项目编号:14BXW043)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：G206
，

本文编号：1537970