风险放大的四级判定框架——基于SARF的理论拓展及典型案例的放大检视
发布时间：2019-07-05 11:41
【摘要】：新媒体语境下,风险放大成为社会风险事件发展的新趋势。国内研究借鉴风险的社会放大框架(SARF)之时并未明确风险放大的判定标准。采用正向理论探索、逆向放大检视两种研究思路,本文综合风险放大的理论框架的衍变及其在现实中的具体表现,从感知、言论、行动及影响四个层面提出了"感知相悖-扩大化争议-群体抗议-涟漪效应"这一风险放大的四级判定框架,并基于判定框架的具体判定标准明确了低层级、中层级、高层级三类风险放大的特征。
[Abstract]:In the context of new media, risk amplification becomes a new trend in the development of social risk events. The judgment standard for risk amplification is not clear when domestic research references the social amplification framework(SARF)of risk. In this paper, a four-level judgment framework of the risk amplification of``Perceptive Controversy Expansion of Disputed Groups'' is proposed from four aspects of perception, speech, action and influence, and the characteristics of low-level, middle and high-level risk amplification are defined based on the specific criteria of the judgment framework.
【作者单位】： 重庆大学新闻学院;
【基金】：重庆大学中央高校基本科研项目“全媒体时代科学传播的转向、路径与问题研究”(2016CDJSK)阶段性成果
【分类号】：G206
本文编号：2510494
[Abstract]:In the context of new media, risk amplification becomes a new trend in the development of social risk events. The judgment standard for risk amplification is not clear when domestic research references the social amplification framework(SARF)of risk. In this paper, a four-level judgment framework of the risk amplification of``Perceptive Controversy Expansion of Disputed Groups'' is proposed from four aspects of perception, speech, action and influence, and the characteristics of low-level, middle and high-level risk amplification are defined based on the specific criteria of the judgment framework.
【作者单位】： 重庆大学新闻学院;
【基金】：重庆大学中央高校基本科研项目“全媒体时代科学传播的转向、路径与问题研究”(2016CDJSK)阶段性成果
【分类号】：G206
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 赵旭东;;地方电视台的竞争策略[J];青年记者;2013年14期
，本文编号：2510494
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/xinwenchuanbolunwen/2510494.html
