莫言《蛙》与村上春树《没有色彩的多崎作和他的巡礼之年》的比较研究

发布时间：2018-01-07 17:01

本文关键词：莫言《蛙》与村上春树《没有色彩的多崎作和他的巡礼之年》的比较研究　出处：《延边大学》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2012年莫言获得诺贝尔文学奖,这个荣誉是来之不易的。那年被提名的还有日本的村上春树,很多人都认为村上春树会获奖。因为他的作品被大众所周知,并翻译成很多语言被世人流传。但2012年瑞典皇室把这份荣誉授给了莫言。自从莫言获奖之后,很多人更关注村上春树,虽然之后村上春树仍然没能获奖,但他的更多作品仍然被大家所接受并喜爱。生命是至高无上的,每个个体都是一个生命,每一个生命都有它的存在的价值。过去是因为政治压迫与人类的无知,而现在是人们过于追求自己的利益,就导致人类忽视生命的尊严及价值。生命的意义在于追寻自然规律的情况下,传承人类的生命：生命的价值在于尊重、了解与包容。但因为科学和医学的不断快速发展,使人类钝化了对生命的珍惜,让人类把生命当做交易的手段来使用。本论文通过莫言的《蛙》和村上春树的《没有色彩的多崎作和他的巡礼之年》的比较,了解两位作家的异同点,用心理学知识来了解当代人们的生命意识及心灵挫伤。两位作家都很重视生命意识,在作品中用不同的方式体现了他们对生命的强烈欲望。莫言的《蛙》表达了在八十年代,中国实施计划生育时面临的有关生命价值的问题。莫言在作品中以人的生命为基点,重视人的感性,通过个体生命的关注,表现作者对生命价值的理解,强调生命的重要性。村上春树的《没有色彩的多崎作和他的巡礼之年》也写到了人对生命的关注及理解。通过寻找自我的旅行中,了解自己的过去,理解他人的感受,并得到自我心灵挫伤的治疗。本论文的第一章阐述了研究范围及研究方法。第二章通过具体的比较,用心理学的角度来了解女性形象,人们的负罪意识和赎罪意识。从中发现两位作家对生命意识的异同点。第三章进一步研究两位作家的生命意识。其一是有关诞生意识的比较,其二就是有关死亡意识的比较。第四章以结论做出总结,诠释现代人需要强烈的生命力,要关注生命,重视生命价值。本论文通过比较两位作家的作品,来证实人们对生命意识的态度与感知。用心理学视角来了解与发现引起这些现象的原因。两位作家都是用自己独特的表达方法来呼吁人们关注生命及其价值。
[Abstract]:In 2012 Mo Yan won the Nobel Prize for Literature, an honor that was not easy to win. That year he was also nominated by Murakami, a Japanese man, who many people thought would win because his work was well known. In 2012, the Swedish royal family awarded the honor to Mo Yan. Since Mo Yan won the prize, many people have paid more attention to Murakami, although he has not won the prize since. But more of his works are still accepted and loved. Life is supreme, every individual is a life, every life has its own value. The past is due to political oppression and human ignorance. But now it is people who pursue their own interests too much, which leads people to ignore the dignity and value of life. The meaning of life lies in the pursuit of natural laws, the inheritance of human life: the value of life lies in respect. Understanding and tolerance. But because of the rapid development of science and medicine, people passivate the treasure of life. Let human beings use life as a means of trading. This paper compares Mo Yan's Frog with Murakami's'No Color 'and' the year of his Tour'to understand the similarities and differences between the two writers. Using psychological knowledge to understand contemporary people's life consciousness and spiritual contusion. Two writers attach great importance to life consciousness. Their strong desire for life is reflected in different ways in his works. "Frog" by Mo Yan is expressed in 80s. In his works, Mo Yan regards human life as the basic point, attaches importance to human sensibility, and expresses the author's understanding of the value of life through the concern of individual life. Emphasize the importance of life. Haruki Murakami's "the year of the Dozaki without colors" also writes about people's concern and understanding of life. Through the journey to find themselves, understand their own past. Understand the feelings of others, and get the treatment of self-spiritual contusion. The first chapter of this paper describes the scope of research and research methods. The second chapter through the specific comparison, using the psychological perspective to understand the image of women. People's consciousness of guilt and atonement. We find the similarities and differences between the two writers' consciousness of life. The third chapter further studies the consciousness of life of the two writers. One is the comparison of the consciousness of birth. The second is the comparison of the consciousness of death. Chapter 4th concludes with conclusions and interprets that modern people need strong vitality, pay attention to life and value of life. This paper compares the works of two writers. In order to verify people's attitude and perception towards life consciousness and to understand and discover the causes of these phenomena from the perspective of psychology, the two writers appeal to people to pay attention to life and its value with their own unique expression methods.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：I106.4-03

【参考文献】