论美国当代自传文学叙事中“真实”的再现伦理

发布时间：2018-01-22 16:28

本文关键词： 真实虚构伦理美国当代自传文学叙事　出处：《江西社会科学》2015年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：自传文学这一叙事文类既要求"真实",但又不可避免地带有"虚构"成分,在"真实"与"虚构"间协调平衡是一个充满伦理选择的过程。对《安吉拉的灰烬》《吻》《说谎:一部隐喻式自传》三部颇具代表性的美国当代自传文学文本的分析表明:当"主观真实"比"历史真实"重要时,即使因各种原因"历史真实"出现偏差也不违伦理;当自传主真诚讲述时,即使讲述的"真实"人生故事不为主流社会规约所容,自传主的勇气依然值得赞赏;当自传主刻意在某一"历史事实"上语焉不详,甚至前后矛盾,但他/她以此建构出来的身份也许更加"真实"。与传统自传(文学)相比,美国当代自传文学屡屡突破真实/虚构、主观/客观之间的界限,以传达更加复杂的人生体验,这使当代自传文学的伦理问题更加微妙。
[Abstract]:Autobiographical literature, as a narrative genre, requires "truth", but inevitably has a "fictional" element. Balancing between "truth" and "fiction" is a process full of ethical choices. To < Angela's Ashes > < Kiss > < lie:. A metaphorical autobiography the analysis of three representative American contemporary autobiography texts shows that: when "subjective truth" is more important than "historical truth". Even for various reasons "historical reality" deviation is not contrary to ethics; When the autobiography is told in good faith, the courage of the autobiographical master is still commendable, even if the "true" life story is not tolerated by the mainstream society. When the autobiography is deliberately vague or even inconsistent on a "historical fact", the identity he / she constructs may be more "real" than the traditional autobiography (literature). American contemporary autobiographical literature often breaks through the boundary between truth / fiction, subjective and objective, in order to convey more complicated life experience, which makes the ethical issues of contemporary autobiographical literature more delicate.
【作者单位】：广东外语外贸大学;
【分类号】：I712.075
【正文快照】： 一、“自传文学”的伦理本质及伦理层面顾名思义,“自传文学”是自传与文学的结合体。传统意义上的自传要求绝对真实,属于历史范畴,而文学的本质则是虚构。因此,“自传文学”既要求“真实”,但又不可避免地带有“虚构”成分,是在个人真实历史基础上的再创造。基于此,我们可以

【相似文献】