论新时期外国文学史范式的建构与转型
发布时间:2018-03-31 02:11
本文选题:外国文学史 切入点:范式 出处:《华东师范大学》2013年博士论文
【摘要】:自1918年首部外国文学史——周作人的《欧洲文学史》诞生以来,迄今为止外国文学史的总体数量已达七百余部。外国文学史编纂的相关问题成为近年来外国文学学界的一个研究热点。但以往研究多从史料出发,缺乏理论深度;而且多集中于一部或几部具体文学史著作,缺乏学术史的宏观视野。为此,本文主要是在学术史的视野之下,运用相关理论,以新时期以来的外国文学史为重点,进行了外国文学史编纂的整体考察与研究。 本文详尽统计了1918年至2012年外国文学史编纂与出版的情况,梳理了近百年来外国文学史编纂的整体概况,主要关注了同一时期外国文学史著作的共性与个性,不同时期外国文学史著作的联系与区别。在此基础上,依据库恩的范式理论,对若干部重要外国文学史著作做出解读与评析;阐释了外国文学史范式建构与转型的具体演变过程。 论文认为,新时期以前,周作人的《欧洲文学史》和郑振铎的《文学大纲》等文学史建构了外国文学史的早期范式,体现出以启蒙和教育为主的性质。新时期以来,早期传统史传点评式的解读、编译为主的模式逐渐式微,马克思主义理论在外国文学史的编写实践中得到广泛运用。这一时期的代表著作为杨周翰主编的《欧洲文学史》,这部文学史既宣告外国文学史编写范式的正式形成,也标志着新旧外国文学史范式的转型。此后,文学史编写遭遇危机,中外有关“重写文学史”的探讨和论争不断。认知哲学、后殖民主义、解构主义等西方文艺理论也对文学史编写产生了影响。外国文学史在文学史观、叙述体例、话语体系等各方面都有所转变。
[Abstract]:Since the birth of Zhou Zuoren's History of European Literature, the first history of foreign literature in 1918, Up to now, the total number of the history of foreign literature has reached more than 700. In recent years, the compilation of the history of foreign literature has become a research hotspot in the field of foreign literature. Moreover, most of them focus on one or more specific works of literary history, which lack the macroscopic view of academic history. Therefore, this paper focuses on the history of foreign literature since the new period, mainly from the perspective of academic history, using relevant theories and focusing on the history of foreign literature since the new period. The whole investigation and research on the compilation of the history of foreign literature have been carried out. This paper makes detailed statistics on the compilation and publication of the history of foreign literature from 1918 to 2012, combs the general situation of the compilation of the history of foreign literature in the last hundred years, and mainly pays attention to the commonness and individuality of the works on the history of foreign literature in the same period. On the basis of this, according to Kuhn's paradigm theory, the author interprets and evaluates the important works of foreign literature history of Ruo cadre. This paper explains the concrete evolution process of the paradigm construction and transformation of foreign literary history. The paper holds that before the new period, the literary history such as Zhou Zuoren's History of European Literature and Zheng Zhenduo's outline of Literature constructed the early paradigm of the history of foreign literature and embodied the nature of enlightenment and education. In the early period, the mode of interpretation and compilation as the basis for the review of historical biographies gradually declined. Marxist theory has been widely used in the writing practice of foreign literary history. The representative of this period is the History of European Literature, edited by Yang Zhouhan. This literary history declares the formal formation of the writing paradigm of foreign literary history. It also marks the transformation of the paradigm of the new and old foreign literary history. Since then, the writing of literary history has encountered a crisis, and the discussion and controversy about "rewriting the literary history" between China and foreign countries have been incessant. Deconstructionism and other western literary theories have also influenced the writing of literary history, and foreign literary history has changed in all aspects, such as literary history view, narrative style, discourse system and so on.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:I109
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 童庆炳;文学经典建构诸因素及其关系[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年05期
2 杨玉珍;外来影响与郑振铎的文学史观[J];北方论丛;2005年04期
3 杨昌龙,韦建国;外国文学史三种主要教材的比较[J];中国大学教学;2001年01期
4 王业伟;;《伊利亚特》主题问题刍议——兼与《外国文学简编(欧美卷)》商榷[J];兰州学刊;2007年07期
5 肖四新;;“外国文学史”编写中的主观性问题[J];南京师范大学文学院学报;2010年03期
6 陈建华;陈婧;;近30年中国对俄苏文学史的研究[J];哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版);2013年02期
7 陈婧;;20世纪50年代前外国文学通史的学术历程[J];理论月刊;2013年06期
8 耿传明;;周作人与古希腊、罗马文学[J];书屋;2006年07期
9 陈婧;陈建华;;外国文学史的范式转型及反思[J];山东社会科学;2013年04期
10 王守仁;我们时代的欧洲文学史[J];外国文学评论;2001年04期
,本文编号:1688686
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yingmeiwenxuelunwen/1688686.html