论芥川龙之介《河童》的思想性

发布时间：2018-05-04 17:50

本文选题：《河童》 + 芥川龙之介　；参考：《河南大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：芥川龙之介是日本大正年代的短篇小说巨匠，被日本文坛誉为“鬼才”。《河童》是他众多短篇小说中最长的一篇，也是最具有代表性的一篇，几近于作者的自传，同时还透露出他对当时社会的各种丑态的鄙视和嘲讽。作品借一个精神病患者之口去叙述在河童国的见闻，将河童国的生育情况、家族制度、恋爱、等生活方面的荒诞性用幽默的语言为我们一一呈现出来，在我们面前展现了一幅生动形象的河童国日常生活图；作者还用犀利的语言、环环相扣地从政治、经济、艺术、法律、资本家的剥削、战争等方面加以详细分析，让我们看到在河童国家里当权者对艺术、对人民的镇压和剥削，揭露了河童国家的利己主义；通过对河童国宗教信仰的描写，说明了河童们生活混乱、毫无信仰的精神状态。该作品将河童国家的荒诞性展现的淋漓尽致，借以讽刺当时社会的黑暗和资本家对人民的压迫，并且处处伴随着作者自身的经历，将作者的思想、艺术观念、对人生的态度和看法全部融入到这部作品当中，，可以说是全面了解芥川龙之介的最完整的一部作品。本文运用陌生化理论、文本分析、对比的方法对《河童》这部作品和《猫城记》这部作品加以比较分析，进而总结出《河童》这部作品的思想艺术特色。本文共分为四章，引言部分主要介绍作者生平、国内外对《河童》这部作品的研究现状；第一章讲述河童这种生物在日本国家的由来、意义和演变过程，以及作者为何选择河童这种虚幻的生物的原因；第二章细读文本，将作品中隐藏着的芥川龙之介挖掘出来；第三章由河童国家的黑暗现实联想到日本当时的黑暗社会;第四章是这篇论文的创新之处，运用陌生化理论去对比分析《河童》与《猫城记》这两部作品。从主题、修辞方法等方面分析了陌生化在两部作品中的表现，然后结合文本，分析两部作品的批判、讽刺力度的不同，最后总结出《河童》的思想艺术特色。
[Abstract]:Akutagawa Ryunosuke is a great master of short stories in Japan's great Zheng age. He is praised as "ghosts" in the Japanese literary world. "River boy" is the longest and most representative part of his many short stories. It is close to the Autobiography of the author. At the same time, he also reveals his disdain and mockery of all kinds of ugliness in the society. In the mouth of the people, we describe the news in the country of river children, present the absurdity of the river child country, the family system, the love, and the absurdity of life, and show us a vivid image of the daily life of the river child country; the author also uses sharp language, from politics, economy, and art to each other. The law, the exploitation of the capitalists, the war and so on, let us see the repression and exploitation of the people in the river children's state, exposing the egoism of the river child state, and through the description of the religious beliefs of the river children, that the river children are in a chaotic and unbelief state. The absurdity of the country is incisively and vividly displayed, to satirize the darkness of the society and the oppression of the people, and to accompany the author's own experience, and integrate the author's thoughts, artistic ideas, and the attitude and view of life into this work, which can be said to have a complete understanding of Akutagawa Ryunosuke's most complete one. By using the theory of defamiliarization, text analysis and comparison, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the works of "river children >" and "the city of cats >", and then summarizes the ideological and artistic features of the works of the "river children >".
This article is divided into four chapters. The introduction mainly introduces the author's life and the research status of the works of "river children" at home and abroad. The first chapter is about the origin, significance and evolution process of the river child in Japan, and the reasons why the author chose the illusory creature of the river child; the second chapter carefully read the text to hide the works. Akutagawa Ryunosuke is excavated; the third chapter is associated with the dark society of the river child state to the dark society of Japan at that time; the fourth chapter is the innovation of this paper, using the theory of defamiliarization to compare and analyze the two works of the "river boy >" and "the cat city". From the theme and the rhetorical method, the performance of the Defamiliarization in the two works is analyzed. Then, combined with the text, it analyzes the criticisms and the intensity of satire of the two works, and finally sums up the ideological and artistic characteristics of the "river child".

【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：I313.074

【参考文献】