《少年派的奇幻漂流》的文学伦理学解读
[Abstract]:Jan Martel is a Canadian writer who rose to fame at the beginning of the 21st century. The Fantasy Drift of Juvenile Pie was published in 2001. It is the second novel by Jan Martel and won many international awards such as the British Mambuk Prize for Literature in 2002. The novel, which has been translated into more than 40 languages and sold well all over the world, was adapted into a film of the same name by famous Chinese director Ang Lee in 2012, prompting a heated discussion of the work. Ever since the publication of the Adolescent Fantasy Drift, it has attracted a wide range of interest from readers and critics. There are several aspects in the study of this work, such as psychoanalysis, ecological criticism, post-colonialism, narrative techniques, animal metaphor and so on. Only two papers focus on the ethical theme of the novel, but so far, there are no articles or papers on the literary ethics criticism of the work of "Fantasy drifting of Juvenile School" is systematically studied. The critical theory of literary ethics is the main theoretical basis of this paper, combined with Freud psychoanalysis theory and John Hick's religious pluralism theory. This paper focuses on the analysis of the process from the emergence of rationality to the emergence of wildness and then to the return of rationality in the process of the protagonist's growth. This paper discusses the different ethical conflicts resulting from the different combinations and changes of the Sphinx factor in the different growth periods of the protagonist. Focusing on the different combinations and changes of the Sphinx factor in different growing periods of the protagonist, the paper first analyzes the background of the growth of the juvenile school, under the influence of nature, parents, teachers and religion. The juvenile school gradually distinguished itself from the animals. After the stage of ethical enlightenment, the ethical consciousness and the stage of ethical choice have emerged. Secondly, it analyzes the psychological process of juvenile school from rational to wild after the shipwreck. From the point of view of literary ethics criticism, this paper interprets the deep-seated reasons for the emergence of tigers and the use of animal versions of stories instead of human stories and discusses the ethical choices of the schools in the process. Finally, the rational consciousness of the school recovers and finally returns to the process of human society. The deep reasons why the analytic school finally realizes the spiritual salvation and the tiger returns to the jungle are analyzed and interpreted. This paper uses the Sphinx factor in the literary ethics criticism to analyze the ethical choices made by the protagonists in the process of rational acquisition, rationality to the wild, and then to the rational return. Jan Martel's exploration of the combination changes of the Sphinx factor in the process of the protagonist's rational growth aims to show that in the process of human rational growth, even in some extreme circumstances, the human nature factor can tame the animal factor. And in this process the role of faith is indispensable.
【学位授予单位】:广西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:I711.074
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 龙云;;文学与伦理学:文学伦理学批评发展的“自由空间”[J];外国文学研究;2009年01期
2 ;“第三届文学伦理学批评国际学术研讨会”会讯[J];当代外国文学;2013年02期
3 聂珍钊;关于文学伦理学批评[J];外国文学研究;2005年01期
4 乔国强;“文学伦理学批评”之管见[J];外国文学研究;2005年01期
5 邹建军;文学伦理学批评的三维指向[J];外国文学研究;2005年01期
6 陈晨;;从文学伦理学批评角度看《紫颜色》中的两性关系[J];科技信息(科学教研);2007年11期
7 张杰;刘增美;;文学伦理学批评的多元主义阐释[J];外国文学研究;2007年05期
8 蔡云艳;;文学伦理学批评:内涵、目的以及范围[J];呼伦贝尔学院学报;2007年05期
9 谢素霞;;《押沙龙,押沙龙!》的文学伦理学解读[J];邵阳学院学报(社会科学版);2008年06期
10 蔡云艳;;文学伦理学批评:内涵、目的以及范围[J];内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
相关会议论文 前7条
1 陆耀东;;关于文学伦理学批评的几个问题[A];“文学伦理学批评:文学研究方法新探讨”学术研讨会论文集[C];2005年
2 邹建军;;文学伦理学批评的实用性与有效性问题[A];“文学伦理学批评:文学研究方法新探讨”学术研讨会论文集[C];2005年
3 聂珍钊;;文学伦理学批评与道德批评[A];“文学伦理学批评:文学研究方法新探讨”学术研讨会论文集[C];2005年
4 聂珍钊;;序言:文学伦理学批评[A];“文学伦理学批评:文学研究方法新探讨”学术研讨会论文集[C];2005年
5 肖建荣;;文学伦理学批评与其他批评方法融合理论与实践初探[A];“文学伦理学批评:文学研究方法新探讨”学术研讨会论文集[C];2005年
6 李成坚;;文学伦理学批评视域下的当代北爱尔兰文化融合与反思[A];“文学伦理学批评:文学研究方法新探讨”学术研讨会论文集[C];2005年
7 尹根德;阮小娟;覃玖英;;文学伦理学视野下的詹姆斯·赖特诗歌解读[A];语言与文化研究(第十二辑)[C];2013年
相关重要报纸文章 前5条
1 王松林;作为方法论的文学伦理学批评[N];文艺报;2006年
2 本报记者 郝日虹;文学伦理学批评打破固有思维定式[N];中国社会科学报;2013年
3 聂珍钊;文学伦理学批评[N];文艺报;2008年
4 车凤成;文学伦理学批评的特征[N];中华读书报;2010年
5 朱宝荣 丁曦妍;面对动物的伦理困惑[N];文艺报;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘清;文学伦理学视阈下《更庄严的大厦》中西蒙的伦理悲剧[D];郑州大学;2015年
2 刘园园;《月照不幸人》的文学伦理学解读[D];郑州大学;2015年
3 王东晓;从文学伦理学批评视角看《沉没之鱼》[D];曲阜师范大学;2015年
4 黄苑;伦理缺位与人性迷失—《换位》的文学伦理学解读[D];中国矿业大学;2015年
5 任彦辉;《少年派的奇幻漂流》的文学伦理学解读[D];广西大学;2015年
6 殷小翠;《只争朝夕》的文学伦理学研究[D];河南大学;2009年
7 朱晓亚;福克纳《熊》的文本变迁与文学伦理学解读[D];华东师范大学;2013年
8 杨舒雅;从文学伦理学角度解读哈金的《等待》[D];武汉理工大学;2013年
9 刘洋;《灶神之妻》的文学伦理学解读[D];哈尔滨师范大学;2013年
10 程宝毛;《押沙龙,,押沙龙!》的文学伦理学解读[D];青岛大学;2013年
本文编号:2388543
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/yingmeiwenxuelunwen/2388543.html