2015年地理高考试卷与内容标准的一致性研究

发布时间：2018-02-24 12:41

本文关键词： 地理高考试卷课程标准内容标准一致性　出处：《陕西师范大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：学业评价是推动教育教学进步的强大动力。高考作为高中阶段最重要的学业评价手段,肩负着选拔人才、指引学生未来发展道路、体现社会公平的重要使命,在全国范围内都有着举足轻重的影响力。为了使高考更加公平合理,高考试卷的命题方式一直在不断探索。2015年全国使用的地理高考试卷一共有14套之多,这些高考试卷是否都能够体现高考的客观性与公平性?是否都能落实新课程标准关于知识广度与认知层次的要求?因此,需要一种更加科学有效的评价标准对高考试卷进行分析。在此背景下,本文将重点研究地理高考试卷与课程标准中内容标准的一致性关系。本研究选择2015年14份地理高考试卷和课程标准中的内容标准部分作为研究对象,通过对相关文献的整理阅读,了解了目前三种主流的一致性分析模式：韦伯一致性分析模式、“SEC”一致性分析模式和成功分析模式。从本研究的需要出发,结合一致性分析模式的特点,选取了“SEC”一致性分析模式来研究高考试卷中必做题部分与高中地理课程标准中内容标准的必修部分的一致性。本研究为地理学业评价的评估提供了科学、有效的新方法。也为命题人和任课教师提供范围参考,以确保学生学习与学业评价的一致性。同时,为即将使用全国卷的自主命题省份提供备考参考。本文的研究过程由三步组成：首先,在参考国外一致性分析案例的基础上,根据我国基础教育实情构建高考地理试卷与课程标准中内容标准的一致性框架,进行“内容主题×认知水平”的矩阵编码。其次,比较2015年高考地理试卷与内容标准之间的一致性水平,并将试卷按地区、类型进行比较,分析差异存在的原因。最后,对2015年高考地理与内容标准的一致性作出总体上的评价,分析影响一致性的因素,并提出合理的建议。本文的研究结论如下：(1)14份地理高考试卷与内容标准之间不存在统计学意义上的显著一致性。(2)在内容主题方面,相对于内容标准,试卷对内容主题的考察平衡度不足。(3)在认知维度方面,试卷整体上相对于内容标准有着更高的要求,并且试卷的认知要求分布更加不平衡。(4)高考试卷与内容标准一致性的高低与地区经济状况存在一定的联系,人均GDP越高,高考试卷与内容标准的一致性程度越高。(5)相对于文科综合试卷,地理单科卷与内容标准有着更高的一致性。
[Abstract]:Academic evaluation is a powerful driving force to promote the progress of education and teaching. As the most important means of academic evaluation in senior high school, the college entrance examination shoulders the important mission of selecting talents, guiding students to develop in the future, and embodying social equity. In order to make the college entrance examination more fair and reasonable, the way of proposition of the college entrance examination papers has been continuously explored. In 2015, there were 14 sets of geographical examination papers used in the whole country. Can these papers reflect the objectivity and fairness of the college entrance examination? Is it possible to implement the requirements of the new curriculum standards on knowledge breadth and cognitive level? Therefore, a more scientific and effective evaluation standard is needed to analyze the college entrance examination papers. This study focuses on the consistency between the geographical college entrance examination papers and the content standard of the curriculum standard. In this study, 14 geographical college entrance examination papers and the content standard of the curriculum standard in 2015 are selected as the research objects. Through the reading of related documents, we understand the three main consistency analysis models: Weber consistency analysis model, "SEC" consistency analysis model and successful analysis model. Combining the characteristics of the consistency analysis model, This paper selects the "SEC" consistency analysis model to study the consistency between the required part of the college entrance examination paper and the required part of the content standard in the high school geography curriculum standard. Effective new methods. Also provide a range of reference for propositions and teachers to ensure the consistency of student learning and academic evaluation. At the same time, The research process of this paper consists of three steps: first, on the basis of reference to foreign consistency analysis cases, According to the facts of basic education in our country, this paper constructs the consistency frame between the geography examination paper and the content standard of the college entrance examination, and carries out the matrix coding of "content subject 脳 cognitive level". Secondly, This paper compares the consistency level between the geography examination paper and the content standard of the college entrance examination in 2015, and compares the papers by region and type, and analyzes the reasons for the differences. Finally, the paper makes a general evaluation on the consistency of geography and content standard of the college entrance examination in 2015. This paper analyzes the factors influencing consistency, and puts forward some reasonable suggestions. The conclusions of this paper are as follows: there is no statistically significant consistency between the 14 geographical college entrance examination papers and the content standard) in terms of content subject, the content standard is relative to the content standard. In cognitive dimension, the test paper as a whole has higher requirements than the content standard. Moreover, the cognitive requirement distribution of the test paper is more unbalanced. 4) the consistency between the test paper and the content standard has a certain relationship with the regional economic situation, and the per capita GDP is higher. The higher the consistency between the college entrance examination paper and the content standard is, the higher the consistency between the geography examination paper and the content standard is compared with the liberal arts comprehensive examination paper.
【学位授予单位】：陕西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G633.55

【相似文献】