当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 高中教育论文 >

人教版与苏教版高中语文教师教学用书比较研究

发布时间:2018-05-27 09:44

  本文选题:人教版 + 苏教版 ; 参考:《河北师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:教师教学用书是教材编者与教师之间沟通的桥梁,它不仅为教师教学活动提供具体的指导建议,其中蕴含的丰富教育教学理念也具有重要的研究价值。目前,在高中语文教师教学用书中,人教版和苏教版影响较大、反响较好,但其中也存在着一些问题。通过人教版与苏教版高中语文教师教学用书的比较,发现其优缺点,可以更好地为高中语文教学服务,提高教学质量。本文以人民教育出版社2007年4月出版的《普通高中课程标准实验教科书》教师教学用书(简称“人教版”)以及江苏教育出版社2014年7月出版的《普通高中课程标准实验教科书》教学参考书(简称“苏教版”)作为研究对象。应用比较分析法、问卷调查法着重对两个版本教师教学用书的编写指导思想、编写体系、使用情况进行比较分析。继而在比较各自优缺点的基础上,取长补短,提出具体的使用及修改建议。本文分为三个部分,各部分观点如下。第一部分主要讨论了人教版和苏教版高中语文教师教学用书编写思想和体系的异同。从编写思想来看,两版语文教师教学用书配套使用的教学用书课程标准一致,编写目的相同,都能较好地指导教师进行教学,但这两个版本在内容安排及对学生能力关注角度等方面也存在着一些不同之处。概而言之,苏教版以人为本引导学习,更具创新性;从编写体系来看,人教版编写体系显得更加简洁,而苏教版的内容较为丰富。同时,二者所强调的重点不同,编写角度也不一样:人教版更加注重知识目标和能力目标;而苏教版则重在构思新颖,注重教学建议,给教师留出了更多的自由发挥空间。第二部分是对使用不同版本(人教版或苏教版)语文教学用书的教师进行情况调查,以发放问卷形式来了解使用情况。通过调查发现,使用人教版语文教学用书的教师中有91.4%认为有必要增加学生学习模块,而使用苏教版的教师中也有83.17%认为有必要增加这一模块,可见提高学生学习模块比重是目前语文教师的普遍呼声。同时,从教师最希望教学用书提供哪些帮助的调查情况来看,使用人教版的教师希望深入挖掘课文的内容,而使用苏教版的教师则认为在教学方法方面需要丰富一些,这样可以更好地为学生服务。第三部分是人教版与苏教版高中语文教师教学用书使用及修订建议。通过对人教版与苏教版用书情况调查比较后发现,两套教师教学用书各有优势,但也存在一定的问题。优势体现在编写风格“一脉相承,推新出新”,“指导性和灵活性的统一”,“用书内容较为新颖,同中求新”。不足的地方有教学内容和设计不够丰富,教学目标单一,缺乏一定科学性与可操作性。针对不足,本文提出了具体的建议:从教师教学用书的编写来说,编者需要更具创新思维,不断丰富教学设计内容,多提供一些学科前沿知识;从教师教学用书的使用来说,教师需要树立一种正确使用观,合理取舍其中的内容,避免对教学用书产生过度的依赖。通过对人教版与苏教版语文教师教学用书的比较,我们发现其编写风格不同,但都体现出一定的创新性,特别是苏教版的创新更为明显,尤其是在教学建议模块中具有许多亮点。而作为高中语文教师,需要在教师教学用书的基础上进行自主创新,形成自己的特色,不断提高教学质量。
[Abstract]:The teacher's teaching book is the bridge between the teaching material editor and the teacher. It not only provides specific guidance for teachers' teaching activities, but also has important research value. At present, in the high school Chinese teachers' teaching books, the human teaching edition and the Soviet edition are greatly influenced and repercussions are better, but they also exist. In comparison with the teaching books of the high school Chinese teachers of the human education edition and the Soviet education edition, we find their advantages and disadvantages to better serve the high school Chinese teaching and improve the quality of the teaching. This article is based on the "experimental textbook of the standard high school curriculum standard" published by the people's education press in April 2007 ("the human teaching edition"). And the teaching reference book of the standard experiment textbook for the standard high school curriculum standard published by the Jiangsu Education Press in July 2014 is the research object. The application comparative analysis method, the questionnaire survey method, focuses on the writing guiding ideology of the two editions of teachers' teaching books, the system of editing and writing, the comparison and analysis of the use situation. On the basis of their respective advantages and disadvantages, the author puts forward the specific use and modification suggestions. This article is divided into three parts. The views of each part are as follows. The first part mainly discusses the similarities and differences between the thought and the system of the writing of the teaching books of the high school Chinese teachers in the teaching edition and the Soviet teaching edition. There are some differences between the two versions in the content arrangement and the perspective of the students' ability. In a word, the Soviet version of the Chinese version is more innovative, and it is more innovative. From the writing system, the human education edition is written. The system appears more concise, but the content of the Soviet version is more abundant. At the same time, the emphasis is different and the writing angle is different from the two. The human education edition pays more attention to the knowledge goal and the ability goal; while the Soviet version emphasizes the new conception, pays more attention to the teaching advice and gives the teachers more free space. The second part is not used to the use. A survey of the teachers in the same version of the Chinese language teaching books is carried out in order to find out the use of the questionnaire. Through the survey, 91.4% of the teachers who use the Chinese language teaching book think it is necessary to increase the students' learning module, and 83.17% of the teachers using the su teaching version think it is necessary to increase this At the same time, it is a common voice for Chinese teachers to increase the proportion of students' learning modules. At the same time, from the survey of what help the teachers hope to provide, the teachers who use the teacher's teaching version hope to dig out the contents of the text, while the teachers in the Soviet education version think that the teaching methods need to be more abundant, The third part is the use and revision of the teaching books of the high school Chinese teachers in the teaching edition and the Soviet education edition. By comparing the situation of the human teaching and the Soviet edition, it is found that the two sets of teaching books have their own advantages, but there are some problems. The new "new", "the unity of guidance and flexibility", "the book content is more novel, the same in the new". Inadequate teaching content and design are not rich, teaching objectives are single, lack of certain scientificity and operability. This article puts forward specific proposals: from the writing of teachers' teaching books, the editor needs more With innovative thinking, we constantly enrich the content of teaching design and provide more advanced knowledge of the subject. From the use of teachers' teaching books, teachers need to set up a correct concept of use, reasonably choose the content and avoid excessive dependence on the teaching books. It is found that the writing style is different, but it all embodies a certain innovation, especially the innovation of the Soviet education version is more obvious, especially in the teaching suggestion module, which has many bright spots. As a high school language teacher, it is necessary to carry out independent innovation on the basis of teachers' teaching books, form its own characteristics and improve the quality of teaching.
【学位授予单位】:河北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G633.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 ;《教师教学用书》节选[J];历史教学;2004年09期

2 刘亚娟;我想对教材与教师教学用书说[J];教书育人;2004年01期

3 张爱明 ,蔡迎春;对《教师教学用书》中一个图式设计的商榷[J];教学与管理;2004年01期

4 吴岐廷;谈化学教师教学用书的特点与使用[J];教学与管理;1997年0Z期

5 张珍华;;高语第三册《教师教学用书》指瑕[J];语文教学之友;2005年01期

6 李清双;;对教师教学用书中一道试题的疑问[J];中小学数学(初中版);2008年Z2期

7 宛平生;;不应这样分类——对教师教学用书上一道应用题及其解答的思考[J];中小学数学(初中版);2009年03期

8 税光华;;在阅读中“修正”答案和注释——例谈教师教学用书中“答案”和“注释”使用的基本方法[J];历史教学(中学版);2011年04期

9 宋君;;《教师教学用书》中的一处错误[J];小学教学研究;1998年02期

10 易爱国;张大勋;;也谈“《教师教学用书》中的一处错误”[J];小学教学研究;1998年07期

相关会议论文 前1条

1 焦国芬;孙毅;;关于氯气的两个实验的微型设计[A];第七届全国微型实验研讨会暨第五届中学微型实验研讨会论文集[C];2007年

相关重要报纸文章 前5条

1 吴炳艳 利州区嘉陵一中;新课程理念下应怎样备课[N];广元日报;2011年

2 江西省婺源县赋春中心小学 江有庆;细读文本才是最好的备课[N];中国教育报;2008年

3 四川省武胜县街子初中 符礼科;钻研教材应找准切入点[N];江苏教育报;2009年

4 市九中 张丽莉;思品教学设计“三用”[N];宜昌日报;2005年

5 ;新课本走近来[N];中国教育报;2001年

相关硕士学位论文 前9条

1 陈肖宇;高中化学教师教学用书教学属性的研究[D];华中师范大学;2015年

2 胡蓉;高中历史教师教学用书比较研究[D];湖南师范大学;2016年

3 宋丽媛;蒙校高中《汉语教师教学用书》中写作指导的编写研究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2016年

4 王靖茹;鲁教版初中语文《教师教学用书》写作部分编制研究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2016年

5 蔡红云;人教版与苏教版高中语文教师教学用书比较研究[D];河北师范大学;2017年

6 刘宏峰;高中语文《教师教学用书》文言文释义辨析[D];内蒙古师范大学;2014年

7 雷志;初中数学教材配套教师教学用书的比较[D];湖南师范大学;2012年

8 鞠婷;沪教版与鲁教版高中地理教师教学用书比较研究[D];上海师范大学;2014年

9 华娜;初中数学教师教学用书的使用与编写[D];湖南师范大学;2013年



本文编号:1941537

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/1941537.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e14af***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com