高中语文人教版必修教材文言文选编研究
[Abstract]:In this paper, the author takes the classical Chinese as the research object in the current edition of "Experimental textbook on Curriculum Standards of General Senior High School" (2nd edition, 2007) and "Full-time ordinary High School textbook (compulsory course)" (1st edition, June 2003). The methods adopted in this paper are content analysis method and comparative method. This paper mainly discusses and analyzes the selection of these two textbooks in ancient classical Chinese. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the two textbooks from the aspects of the quantity of classical Chinese, the selected structure, the times, the content of the selected text and the difficult points of grammar and so on. Through comparison, we can find that the two editions have their own characteristics of selections. For example, the 03 edition has rich selections, attaches importance to the grasp of the foundation of classical Chinese, and basically arranges the textbook of classical Chinese .07 according to the order of the history of literature, while respecting the differences of the students. And according to the rules of cognitive arrangement. However, there are still many problems in the selection of textbooks, such as the cohesion of selected texts and the problems of the times, which are the factors that hinder the teaching of classical Chinese, so we need to actively improve these problems. The compilation and selection of teaching materials is a systematic project, including all aspects of problems, it is very difficult to analyze comprehensively. Therefore, the author puts forward some suggestions for compiling and selecting some problems encountered in these two editions of textbooks. We should pay attention to the problem of quantity in the selection standard, not too much or too little. We should start from the acceptance of students and strengthen the cultivation of interest. We should also strengthen the connection with junior high school textbooks and strengthen the chronology of selecting texts, and reduce the difficulty moderately. We should pay attention to the systematization, comprehensiveness and the order of arrangement from easy to difficult.
【学位授予单位】:海南师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2013
【分类号】:G634.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 刘曙峰;语文学科独立的历程与反思——从建国后中学语文教材发展史看语文学科建设[J];湘南学院学报;2004年06期
2 陈玉茜;高中语文新教材文言文改革探究[J];淮北煤炭师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年02期
3 陈羽羽;;语法是文言文教学的金钥匙[J];文学教育(下);2010年05期
4 曹亚;;高中文言文诵读教学策略采摭[J];文学教育(下);2012年06期
5 易建平;;从选文演变看当代高中文言文教材的发展[J];语文教学通讯;2007年25期
6 盛书山;我国中小学语文教学的病根到底是什么?——关于语文教育的世纪思考[J];中学语文教学;2000年12期
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 倪晶;三版高中语文教材的比较研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2010年
2 陆薇薇;高中语文文言文教材研究[D];华东师范大学;2001年
3 郭琦;我国中学语文教材的流变与前瞻[D];湖南师范大学;2004年
4 权俊良;新时期高中语文教材古代作品选文研究[D];苏州大学;2005年
5 易建平;当代中学语文教材文言文选文研究[D];华东师范大学;2006年
6 关国青;高中语文教材古诗文研究[D];华东师范大学;2006年
7 唐丽;人教1990版与2001版中学语文教材文言文部分的定量比较分析[D];首都师范大学;2006年
8 张丽苹;古典阐释学视域下的中学文言文教学[D];四川师范大学;2008年
9 丁友存;人教版《初中语文》文言文的编选及教学策略研究[D];南京师范大学;2008年
本文编号:2171106
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2171106.html