中国人教版与美国McGraw版初中生物教材中知识内容的比较研究
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the rapid development of science and technology, the acceleration of knowledge economy and the increasingly fierce competition of national strength, the quality of education determines a country's comprehensive national strength, and countries all over the world attach great importance to national education. Important resources, a good textbook for improving students'scientific literacy is of great significance. The knowledge content selected in the textbook is conducive to students' future development. What knowledge is conducive to students'future development? Genetics) Comparing the importance of biology curriculum at the national level between China and the United States, and the extent to which students are expected to attain knowledge level after learning biology curriculum; Comparing the breadth and depth of knowledge, the arrangement of knowledge content and the understanding of the same concept at different levels through text comparative analysis The difference of ecological and genetic knowledge content in junior high school biology textbooks edited by Chinese Educational Press and McGraw-Hill Education of the United States was investigated by questionnaires among 20 excellent junior high school biology teachers in Guiyang, in order to understand the current professional knowledge of junior high school biology teachers in Guiyang. Ping. Through this study, we found that there are three problems in the content of ecology and genetics knowledge in junior high school biology textbooks published by the Chinese Educational Press: (1) the breadth and depth of knowledge are shallow; (2) the distribution of knowledge points is scattered, and the logical relationship between knowledge is not strong; (3) the update speed of knowledge is slow. A good textbook should ensure the subject of knowledge content. Based on this, the author puts forward the following suggestions for the compilation of junior high school biology textbooks: (1) Selecting the content of knowledge, increasing the depth and breadth of knowledge; (2) Following the students'cognitive rules, enlarging the logical relationship between knowledge; (3) Updating the content of knowledge in time, adding the current frontier knowledge of science. The compilation of the textbooks leaves some space for teachers to handle the textbooks freely and has certain flexibility. However, the survey of 20 excellent biology teachers in Guiyang shows that the professional level of biology teachers in Guiyang is insufficient at present, so the professional knowledge of biology teachers in junior middle schools should be strengthened in the future. Level improvement.
【学位授予单位】:贵州师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:G633.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 张常;王新文;王亮;高山;;“垃圾”DNA的奥秘[J];科学通报;2016年Z2期
2 吴国盛;;究竟什么是科学(上)[J];中国经济报告;2014年10期
3 杨龙立;潘丽珠;;课程标准(教学计划或教学大纲)组成要素的探讨[J];教育学报;2010年01期
4 张必良;王玮;;RNA在核糖体催化蛋白质合成中的作用[J];中国科学(C辑:生命科学);2009年01期
5 施德明;;高中生物模型方法教学及策略[J];科学大众;2008年01期
6 汪忠;《生物课程标准》和《生物教学大纲》的比较[J];生物学通报;2002年02期
7 倪健;区域尺度的中国植物功能型与生物群区[J];植物学报;2001年04期
8 ;中共中央国务院关于深化教育改革全面推进素质教育的决定[J];中国职业技术教育;1999年07期
9 ;中共中央国务院关于加速科学技术进步的决定[J];中国科技论坛;1995年04期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 倪健;张新时;;生物多样性保育和全球变化研究中的陆地生物群区类型[A];生物多样性与人类未来——第二届全国生物多样性保护与持续利用研讨会论文集[C];1996年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 宋海霞;初中生物教材中环境教育内容的比较研究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2016年
2 赵健;三个版本初中生物新教材中实验部分的比较研究[D];内蒙古师范大学;2016年
3 林晓霖;中美初中生物课程标准和教材的比较研究[D];福建师范大学;2015年
4 尹凤;中日两国初级中学生物学实验内容的比较研究[D];贵州师范大学;2014年
5 王幼俊;中美初中科学教材知识体系比较研究[D];华中师范大学;2013年
6 王金刚;义务教育初中生物教材科学探究的比较研究[D];华中师范大学;2013年
7 高靖;基于学习难度模型的中外初中生物教科书比较研究[D];华东师范大学;2010年
,本文编号:2236040
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2236040.html