高中生向量理解水平的调查研究
[Abstract]:Since the 20th century, mathematics understanding of (Mathematical understanding) has become another hot topic in mathematics education. With the development of curriculum reform, many countries have taken vector as the teaching content of high school mathematics. In 1996, the Mathematics syllabus of Full-time General High School in our country made "plane vector" a compulsory subject, and space vector as a method to deal with the problem of space geometry. Since then vector formally entered our senior high school mathematics curriculum; In the "ordinary Senior Middle School Mathematics Curriculum Standard (experiment)" issued by the Ministry of Education in 2003, plane vector and space vector were set in compulsory module 4 and elective series 2-1, respectively. Now vector has become an important part of senior high school mathematics. What is the current situation of high school students' understanding of vector in practical teaching? How to design and implement the teaching according to the situation of students at different levels of understanding and how to choose teaching strategies have become the problem that high school teachers pay attention to. Based on the theory of APOS and the concept of vector, this paper makes an investigation on the level of vector understanding among 289 senior high school students and 3 mathematics teachers in Yangzhou by means of test investigation and interview. The specific research questions include: (1) the current situation of high school students' understanding after studying vector unit; (2) explore and analyze the reasons for students to reach a certain level of understanding, (3) based on the level of understanding of students, what are the effective strategies of mathematics teaching and learning. The author makes a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the data obtained from the investigation, and draws the following conclusions: (1) the understanding of the stage of vector operation, according to the survey statistics, shows that 67.53% of the first year students are excellent. All the students surveyed were qualified and above; 38.21% of the students in Grade 3 were excellent, and 45.75% of the students were in good level. Students in two grades have basically reached the normal level of vector operation. Students can basically judge whether a quantity is a vector and understand the essential difference between a physical vector and a scalar. (2) there are differences in students' understanding of the characteristics of various types of vectors. In the course of investigation, students tend to ignore the consideration of zero vectors and lack the habit of thinking about classification and discussion. (3) the students' understanding of the transformation between vector representations is unidirectional. From image form to symbol form and coordinate form, the transformation between symbol and coordinate is easy, but it is difficult to solve the problem from symbol form to image form. (4) Senior three students have higher flexibility in using vector to solve problems. But from the point of view of knowledge network connection, the network content of the two grades is not rich enough, and does not show the linear growth with grade, the object of connection is mainly the concept of the following position, and lacks the connection to the concept of parallelism. Combined with the results of this study, the author puts forward several teaching requirements: (1) enriching perceptual experience, understanding concepts intuitively; (2) understanding concepts from various representations; (3) paying attention to strengthening the relationship between knowledge points. Two suggestions are put forward for the cultivation of normal school students: (1) with the accumulation of professional knowledge, attention should be paid to the understanding of the related concepts in elementary mathematics; (2) the research study should be carried out according to the teachers' nature, and the level of understanding of elementary mathematics knowledge should be improved consciously.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G633.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谢芳;张春生;;《普通高中数学新课程标准(实验)》解读[J];山西广播电视大学学报;2009年03期
2 潘小明;概念理解 重在建立恰当的心理表征[J];数学通报;2000年09期
3 ;今日数学及其应用[J];数学通报;1994年07期
4 陈国正;对一道课本习题答案的意见[J];数学通报;1995年03期
5 刘锡园;数学直观我见[J];数学教育学报;1998年01期
6 马复;试论数学理解的两种类型──从R.斯根普的工作谈起[J];数学教育学报;2001年03期
7 李淑文,张同君;“超回归”数学理解模型及其启示[J];数学教育学报;2002年01期
8 黄燕玲,喻平;对数学理解的再认识[J];数学教育学报;2002年03期
9 于新华,杨之;数学理解的层次性及其教学意义[J];数学教育学报;2005年02期
10 濮安山;史宁中;;从APOS理论看高中生对函数概念的理解[J];数学教育学报;2007年02期
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 郭兆明;数学高级认知图式获得方式的比较研究[D];西南大学;2006年
2 陈雪梅;中学向量课程与教学的研究[D];华东师范大学;2007年
3 徐彦辉;数学理解的理论探讨与实证研究[D];华东师范大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 郑秀云;APOS理论指导下的高中数学概念教学[D];福建师范大学;2003年
2 曹金明;高中数学课程中向量教学研究[D];西北师范大学;2004年
3 兰冲;APOS理论下的函数概念认知及教学启示[D];华中师范大学;2006年
4 彭勇;关于向量及其教学研究[D];华中师范大学;2006年
5 苏文娟;中学生数学理解教学现状研究[D];南京师范大学;2006年
6 张凤莲;高中数学中的向量研究[D];华中师范大学;2007年
7 莫韬;基于APOS理论的圆锥曲线概念教学实证研究[D];广西师范大学;2007年
8 赵宇;空间向量对立体几何教与学影响的研究[D];东北师范大学;2008年
9 陈东强;中学数学向量内容的教学研究[D];河北师范大学;2009年
,本文编号:2404166
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2404166.html

