“一标多本”教材观下的初中语文教科书助读系统比较研究
发布时间：2019-02-13 10:54
【摘要】：伴随新课改的深入和新课标的颁布,初中语文教科书出现了“一标多本”的局面,多版教科书的出现为语文教科书比较研究提供了条件。根据教育部要求,2016年秋新学期,七年级开始使用新版语文教科书,部编本人教新版和修订版苏教新版语文教科书在全国得到广泛使用,评价也很高。虽然同为新课标改版教科书,但两版各有一套编写理念和编写特色,在编写上存在显著差异,作为教科书四大系统之一的助读系统也是如此。因为助读系统最能体现教科书编者意图和课标要求,是教科书改革的一个重要方向,所以很有必要对它进行研究。本文以人教、苏教新旧四版初中语文教科书(七上)助读系统为例,采用理论和实践相结合的研究方法,比较其编写和使用情况。研究的主要内容包括三个部分,第一部分是比较四版教科书助读系统的编写情况,首先对各版编写体系进行梳理,总结各版编写特色,再对助读系统的四大要素——提示语、插图、注释、资料进行比较。通过对人教、苏教新旧版的纵向比较和人教、苏教新版的横向比较,总结出助读各要素的编写经验与不足,再提出对各要素编写的启示。第二部分是调查两新版助读系统在师生中的使用情况,问卷主要围绕他们对助读系统的认识、使用、评价及建议四方面展开,通过分析问卷的统计数据得出师生在使用助读系统中存在的四个方面的问题。第三部分在理论和实践研究的基础上提出自己的改进建议。在编写上,围绕编写理论、编写体制、教科书评价机制和教师培训四方面展开;在使用上,教师需不断增强教学技能,提高使用助读系统的水平;学生要在教师的引导下,发挥学习的自主性,在预习、课中和复习时合理利用助读系统,提高学习效率。本研究旨在把握两版助读系统的发展趋势和两新版在新课程理念倡导下的编写与使用情况,笔者总结得出,两新版助读系统在编写体系上虽各有特色,但各要素仍需完善,因此笔者从编写和使用两方面提出一些不成熟的建议,希望能为两版教科书编写者提供一些修订建议,同时也能帮助使用者认识助读系统在教学方面的价值,并提出一些使用建议,使师生更好地使用助读系统,让助读系统发挥其使用价值。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the new curriculum reform and the promulgation of the new curriculum standard, the situation of "one standard and more books" appears in the junior middle school Chinese textbooks, and the appearance of multi-edition textbooks provides the conditions for the comparative study of Chinese textbooks. According to the request of the Ministry of Education, in the new semester of autumn 2016, the seventh grade began to use the new edition of Chinese textbooks, and the new edition of the new edition and the revised version of the new edition of the Chinese language textbook of the Ministry of Education were widely used in the whole country, and the evaluation was also very high. Although the textbook is revised by the new curriculum standard, each edition has a set of writing idea and writing characteristics, and there are significant differences in the compilation, as well as the reading aid system, which is one of the four major textbook systems. Because the reading aid system can best reflect the intention of textbook editor and the requirement of curriculum standard, it is an important direction of textbook reform, so it is necessary to study it. This paper takes the reading aid system of the four editions of junior middle school Chinese textbooks (upper seven) as an example, and compares its compilation and application with the research method of combining theory with practice. The main content of the study includes three parts. The first part is to compare the compiling situation of the four edition textbook reading aid system. Firstly, it combs the writing system of each edition, summarizes the characteristics of each edition, and then gives the four main elements of the reading aid system-hint. Illustrations, notes, and materials are compared. Through the vertical comparison of the new edition and the horizontal comparison between the new edition and the new edition, the author sums up the experience and deficiency in the compilation of the elements of aiding reading, and then puts forward the enlightenment to the compilation of the elements. The second part is to investigate the use of the two new reading aid systems among teachers and students. The questionnaire mainly focuses on their understanding, use, evaluation and recommendations of the reading aid system. By analyzing the statistical data of the questionnaire, four problems in the use of the reading aid system for teachers and students are obtained. The third part puts forward some suggestions for improvement on the basis of theoretical and practical research. In the aspect of writing, it revolves around writing theory, writing system, textbook evaluation mechanism and teacher training, and teachers need to strengthen teaching skills and improve the level of using reading aid system. Under the guidance of teachers, students should give full play to their autonomy in learning, make use of the reading aid system in preparation, class and review, and improve their learning efficiency. The purpose of this study is to grasp the development trend of the two versions of the reading aid system and the compilation and use of the two new versions under the new curriculum concept. The author concludes that although the two new versions of the reading aid system have their own characteristics, each element still needs to be improved. Therefore, the author puts forward some immature suggestions from two aspects of writing and using, hoping to provide some revised suggestions for the authors of the two editions of textbooks, and at the same time to help the users to understand the value of the reading aid system in teaching. Some suggestions are put forward to make the teachers and students better use the reading aid system, and let the reading aid system play its use value.
【学位授予单位】：合肥师范学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G633.3
本文编号：2421479
[Abstract]:With the deepening of the new curriculum reform and the promulgation of the new curriculum standard, the situation of "one standard and more books" appears in the junior middle school Chinese textbooks, and the appearance of multi-edition textbooks provides the conditions for the comparative study of Chinese textbooks. According to the request of the Ministry of Education, in the new semester of autumn 2016, the seventh grade began to use the new edition of Chinese textbooks, and the new edition of the new edition and the revised version of the new edition of the Chinese language textbook of the Ministry of Education were widely used in the whole country, and the evaluation was also very high. Although the textbook is revised by the new curriculum standard, each edition has a set of writing idea and writing characteristics, and there are significant differences in the compilation, as well as the reading aid system, which is one of the four major textbook systems. Because the reading aid system can best reflect the intention of textbook editor and the requirement of curriculum standard, it is an important direction of textbook reform, so it is necessary to study it. This paper takes the reading aid system of the four editions of junior middle school Chinese textbooks (upper seven) as an example, and compares its compilation and application with the research method of combining theory with practice. The main content of the study includes three parts. The first part is to compare the compiling situation of the four edition textbook reading aid system. Firstly, it combs the writing system of each edition, summarizes the characteristics of each edition, and then gives the four main elements of the reading aid system-hint. Illustrations, notes, and materials are compared. Through the vertical comparison of the new edition and the horizontal comparison between the new edition and the new edition, the author sums up the experience and deficiency in the compilation of the elements of aiding reading, and then puts forward the enlightenment to the compilation of the elements. The second part is to investigate the use of the two new reading aid systems among teachers and students. The questionnaire mainly focuses on their understanding, use, evaluation and recommendations of the reading aid system. By analyzing the statistical data of the questionnaire, four problems in the use of the reading aid system for teachers and students are obtained. The third part puts forward some suggestions for improvement on the basis of theoretical and practical research. In the aspect of writing, it revolves around writing theory, writing system, textbook evaluation mechanism and teacher training, and teachers need to strengthen teaching skills and improve the level of using reading aid system. Under the guidance of teachers, students should give full play to their autonomy in learning, make use of the reading aid system in preparation, class and review, and improve their learning efficiency. The purpose of this study is to grasp the development trend of the two versions of the reading aid system and the compilation and use of the two new versions under the new curriculum concept. The author concludes that although the two new versions of the reading aid system have their own characteristics, each element still needs to be improved. Therefore, the author puts forward some immature suggestions from two aspects of writing and using, hoping to provide some revised suggestions for the authors of the two editions of textbooks, and at the same time to help the users to understand the value of the reading aid system in teaching. Some suggestions are put forward to make the teachers and students better use the reading aid system, and let the reading aid system play its use value.
【学位授予单位】：合肥师范学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：G633.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 贾红红;;“提示语”存在的问题及修改建议——以人教版初中语文教材为例[J];语文教学之友;2014年08期
2 李彩彦;;谈初中语文教科书中插图的现状、问题和对策[J];教育探索;2013年01期
3 杨道麟;;美学视野下的语文教材内蕴略论[J];安阳师范学院学报;2012年06期
4 王洋洋;;母语教材的提示语功能探微[J];基础教育研究;2011年02期
5 程丽阳;;思维发展理论:语文教材助读系统的构建依据[J];教育理论与实践;2010年33期
6 程丽阳;;“先行组织者”:语文教材助读系统的理论基石[J];教学与管理;2009年36期
7 程丽阳;;语文教材助读系统理论初探[J];太原师范学院学报(社会科学版);2009年06期
8 邱志飞;;刍议语文教材的助读系统[J];语文教学之友;2008年09期
9 刘淼 ,罗方 ,彭涛;语文教材插图效应及其在语文教学中的应用[J];语文建设;2005年11期
10 朱洪祥;反思与建构:预习提示研究[J];河北师范大学学报(教育科学版);2003年02期
，本文编号：2421479
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/zhongdengjiaoyulunwen/2421479.html
