苏州与台北两市中小学体育教师在职培训路径比较研究

发布时间：2019-07-03 20:20

【摘要】：教师在职培训是提高中小学体育教师专业素质最有效的途径之一。本文采用比较分析法、问卷调查法、访谈法等研究方法,以苏州与台北两市中小学体育教师在职培训为研究对象,通过分析两市中小学体育教师在职培训的各自特点以及在职培训的组织机构、培训内容、培训方式、授课教师、考核与评价等方面的异同与优劣,从而为提升苏州市中小学体育教师在职培训的质量和效果提供有益的借鉴。研究结论如下:(1)两市被调查的中小学体育教师都参加过在职培训,说明两市中小学体育教师在职培训的普及率较高。(2)两市都制订了相应的法令法规来确保体育教师在职培训的规范性;苏州市的法令法规对培训的学时学分要求较为详细,而台北市的法令法规在培训的考核奖励方面要求较为详细,两市都需要在不同方面进一步完善培训的法令法规。(3)两市主要的培训组织机构都是以学校、教师培训中心(教师研习中心)与教育局为主,但台北市有更多的民间组织机构承担教师在职培训,这一做法值得苏州市相关部门的借鉴。(4)两市在职培训的经费大部分是由学校或培训主管部门承担,少数的培训经费是由个人独自承担;台北市个人承担的比例高于苏州市,这对提高培训的效果是有利的。(5)两市大多数中小学体育教师能认识到在职培训的意义,且期望在培训中能获得创新的体育教学知识与方法;台北市中小学体育教师参加在职培训的内部动机要高于苏州市。(6)苏州市在职培训时间主要安排在教师业余时间,台北市在职培训时间主要安排在上班时间;两市在职培训都以短时间的集中培训为主,大约为1—3小时居多;苏州市体育教师每学期参加的在职培训的次数多于台北市。(7)两市在职培训的内容主要是教学方法和体育科专业知识,这与两市体育教师期待的培训内容相一致;在培训内容上,台北市增加了民俗传统体育与当下热点(性平、环保)等内容,这显得培训内容更为丰富。(8)两市在职培训的主要方式都为专家讲座、观摩名师课堂教学、教师同侪经验分享,并且两市中小学体育教师对目前的培训方式较为满意。(9)两市中小学体育教师整体上对授课教师比较满意,教学现场经验丰富的专家教师与幽默风趣、感染力强、善于调动听众的授课教师最受欢迎。(10)两市中小学体育教师参加的在职培训有考核评价的只占了一半,考核方式以完成相关作业、撰写培训心得和小论文为主。(11)苏州市教育局与学校对体育教师在职培训的重视程度高于台北市,另外,两市对中小学体育教师在职培训的整体评价一般,但苏州市对在职培训的满意度高于台北市。
[Abstract]:Teacher in-service training is one of the most effective ways to improve the professional quality of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools. This paper adopts the methods of comparative analysis, questionnaire survey, interview and so on, and takes the on-the-job training of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in Suzhou and Taipei as the research object. Through analyzing the respective characteristics of the in-service training of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in the two cities, as well as the similarities and differences and advantages and disadvantages of the on-the-job training organization, training content, training methods, teaching teachers, assessment and evaluation, etc. So as to improve the quality and effect of on-the-job training of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in Suzhou. The conclusions are as follows: (1) the physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools surveyed in the two cities have participated in on-the-job training, indicating that the popularization rate of in-service training of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in the two cities is high. (2) both cities have formulated corresponding laws and regulations to ensure the standardization of in-service training of physical education teachers; The laws and regulations of Suzhou City require more detailed hours and credits for training, while the laws and regulations of Taipei City require more detailed requirements in terms of the assessment and reward of training. Both cities need to further improve the laws and regulations of training in different aspects. (3) the main training organizations in both cities are schools, teacher training centers (teacher training centers) and the Bureau of Education. However, there are more non-governmental organizations in Taipei to undertake the on-the-job training of teachers, which is worthy of reference by the relevant departments in Suzhou. (4) most of the funds for on-the-job training in the two cities are borne by schools or training authorities, and a small number of training funds are borne by individuals alone; The proportion of individual undertaking in Taipei is higher than that in Suzhou, which is beneficial to improve the effect of training. (5) most physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in the two cities can realize the significance of on-the-job training and expect to obtain innovative physical education teaching knowledge and methods in the training; The internal motivation of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in Taipei is higher than that in Suzhou. (6) the on-the-job training time in Suzhou is mainly arranged in the spare time of teachers, and the on-the-job training time in Taipei is mainly arranged in working hours. The number of on-the-job training for physical education teachers in Suzhou is more than that in Taipei. (7) the contents of on-the-job training in the two cities are mainly teaching methods and professional knowledge of physical education, which is consistent with the expected training content of physical education teachers in the two cities; In terms of training content, Taipei City has added folk traditional sports and current hot spots (sexual equality, environmental protection) and so on, which shows that the training content is even richer. (8) the main ways of on-the-job training in both cities are expert lectures, observing famous teachers' classroom teaching, and sharing the experience of teachers' peers. And the primary and secondary school physical education teachers in the two cities are more satisfied with the current training methods. (9) the primary and secondary school physical education teachers in the two cities are more satisfied with the teaching teachers as a whole, the experienced expert teachers and humorous teachers in the teaching site are funny and infectious, and the teachers who are good at mobilizing the audience are the most popular. (10) only half of the on-the-job training attended by the primary and secondary school physical education teachers in the two cities is assessed and evaluated, and the assessment mode is to complete the relevant homework. Writing training experience and small papers. (11) Suzhou Bureau of Education and schools pay more attention to on-the-job training of physical education teachers than Taipei City. In addition, the overall evaluation of on-the-job training of physical education teachers in primary and secondary schools in the two cities is general, but Suzhou's satisfaction with on-the-job training is higher than that in Taipei.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G633.96

【相似文献】