作为问题的“问题意识”——从法学论文写作中的命题缺失现象切入

发布时间：2018-04-08 12:00

本文选题：问题意识　切入点：法学论文写作　出处：《探索与争鸣》2017年05期

【摘要】：那种按照教科书式体例撰写的法学论文,其最大的弊病在于"有论域而无论题",亦即只是选定了一个研究领域、对象或范围进行面面俱到的介绍和叙述,却没有从中提炼出一个中心论题贯穿全文始终并加以论证。教科书式的写作风格在今天仍然顽强乃至顽固地继续影响着法学论文的写作,这在很多题为"××制度研究"或"论××制度"的硕博士学位论文当中体现得尤其明显。之所以仍然存在这种现象,很大程度上是与对问题意识的重视不够和认识误区有关,特别是没有充分意识到问题(question)、论题(problem)和命题(issue)之间的区别。对于如何提炼问题意识这一问题的思考,可以围绕"书本知识VS.社会实践""历史视野VS.现实关怀"和"中国意识VS.国际视野"这三组概念展开。
[Abstract]:The biggest drawback of a legal paper written according to a textbook style is that it has a field of discussion without a topic, that is, it only selects a research field, object or scope for comprehensive introduction and narration.But did not extract a central topic throughout the full text and to demonstrate.The style of textbook writing is still stubbornly affecting the writing of legal papers today, which is especially evident in many doctoral theses entitled "study of 脳脳 system" or "on 脳脳 system".The reason why this phenomenon still exists, to a large extent, is related to the lack of attention to the problem consciousness and the misunderstanding of understanding, especially the lack of awareness of the difference between the question question (problem) and the proposition (issue).Thinking about how to refine problem consciousness can revolve around book knowledge VS.Social practice.Realistic concern and Chinese consciousness VS.International Vision, the three sets of concepts.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究青年项目“中国法制实践中的国家能力问题:历史与现实的双重视角”(15SFB3002)
【分类号】：D90-4

【相似文献】