《大业律》研究

发布时间：2018-05-14 15:40

本文选题：《大业律》 + 隋炀帝　；参考：《湘潭大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：一直以来,受传统认识的影响,学界对隋炀帝时的《大业律》评价不高,认为其较之开皇三年颁布的《开皇律》是一种倒退。当我们摆脱以往关于《大业律》的思维定势,通过对所掌握的史料进行客观仔细地分析,就会发现《大业律》本身是一部应当得到肯定的良律。过去人们误读《大业律》的主要原因是采用的评价方法有误,即将立法本身与司法实践相混同,将隋炀帝个人的人品与立法的目的相混淆,隋炀帝个人人品的缺陷和执法上的偏差不恰当地成了评价《大业律》的主导标准。为了走出以往的误区,使人们客观地认知《大业律》和与之相关的问题,笔者拟从五个部分展开详细论述。第一部分为引言,主要说明选题的意义、综述已有的对《大业律》的研究成果、提出自己对这一问题的研究思路和创新之处。第二部分主要论述《大业律》制定的背景、缘起、指导思想和编纂过程及编纂人员。第三部分采取辑录为主、倒推为辅,将历史文献中有关《大业律》的篇目、罪名、刑罚和诉讼程序进行归纳分类,形成严谨的体系,使我们能从整体上大致把握《大业律》的内容。第四部分考察《大业律》的适用情况,具体分为前期的适用情况和后期的适用情况,并着力分析《大业律》废弛的原因。第五部分论述《大业律》对中国封建后世以及东亚其他国家立法的影响,指明它对中华法系的形成也起到过促进作用。最后对《大业律》的历史地位做出客观的总结性评判。
[Abstract]:Under the influence of the traditional knowledge, the academic circles did not highly evaluate the "law of great cause" of Emperor Yang of Sui Dynasty, and considered that it was a retrogression compared with the "Law of opening the Emperor" issued by the Emperor in three years. When we get rid of the past thinking about the law of great cause and analyze the historical data we can find that the law of great cause itself is a good law that should be affirmed. In the past, the main reason why people misread the Great cause Law was that there was a mistake in the evaluation method, that is, the legislation itself was mixed with judicial practice, and the personal character of Sui Yangdi was confused with the purpose of legislation. The imperfection of Sui Yangdi's personal character and the deviation of law enforcement have become the dominant standard in evaluating Daye Law. In order to get rid of the mistakes in the past and make people know the law of great cause objectively and the related problems, the author intends to discuss it in detail from five parts. The first part is the introduction, mainly explains the significance of the topic, summarizes the existing research results on the law of great cause, and puts forward their own research ideas and innovations on this issue. The second part mainly discusses the background, origin, guiding ideology, compilation process and compilers. In the third part, the contents, charges, penalties and proceedings of the historical documents concerning the law of great cause are summarized and classified to form a rigorous system. So that we can generally grasp the contents of the law of great cause. The fourth part investigates the application of Daye Law, which is divided into the early application and the late application, and analyzes the reasons for the abandonment of Daye Law. The fifth part discusses the influence of the Great cause Law on the legislation of Chinese feudal later generations and other countries in East Asia, and points out that it has also played a role in promoting the formation of Chinese legal system. Finally, the historical status of the law of great cause is objectively evaluated.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D929

【参考文献】