中国与斯里兰卡仲裁制度若干问题比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-22 17:45

本文选题：非讼纠纷解决机制 + 自裁管辖　；参考：《浙江大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：仲裁作为一种非讼纠纷解决机制伴随着现代经济的快速发展,凭借其专业、保密、易执行、充分体现当事人意思自由等特性,在诸多纠纷解决机制中脱颖而出,成为现代经济纠纷解决的首选方式。仲裁制度历史悠久,最早可追溯到古罗马时期,后英国于1697年正式确立了仲裁制度。数个世纪以来,仲裁制度通过不断的发展与完善,从最初的民间性、简易性逐渐向国际化发展。中国仲裁制度在《仲裁法》颁布以来有了飞速的发展,短短十几年之内,建立了多达两百多家的国内仲裁机构。仲裁机构受理的案件数量也呈逐年上升趋势。但是,随着经济的深入发展,我国现有的一些仲裁制度已经不能符合现代纠纷解决的需要,亦不能与仲裁的国际发展趋势相统一。斯里兰卡作为南亚的一个发展中国家,曾为英国的殖民地,但同时其也继承了英美法系的法律特点。2009年斯里兰卡内战正式宣告结束,政府开始关注国内经济的发展,并为本国的招商引资创造条件,而作为现代国际商事纠纷解决的重要方式,仲裁自然成为关注的重点。斯里兰卡的仲裁法律制度深受英美法系的影响,同时又注重借鉴国际上相关的先进制度,形成了具备自身特色的仲裁体制。有鉴于此,本文将以斯里兰卡仲裁法律为比较蓝本,在介绍斯里兰卡仲裁制度的同时,关注国际仲裁制度发展趋势,与我国现有的仲裁制度进行比较。文章共分为四大部分,第一部分先介绍了仲裁在现代化纠纷解决机制中相比其他制度的优越性；第二部分则侧重于中国与斯里兰卡仲裁法律制度的发展特点；第三部分着重对两国的具体仲裁制度中的若干问题进行比较,如仲裁原则、仲裁程序及仲裁的司法监督,从比较中发现中国现有仲裁制度所存在的缺陷；最后一部分,则针对在比较过程中发现的中国仲裁制度存在的问题提出具体对策及意见,以促进我国仲裁制度的现代化发展。
[Abstract]:As a kind of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanism, with the rapid development of modern economy, arbitration stands out among many dispute resolution mechanisms by virtue of its specialty, confidentiality, ease of execution, full embodiment of the parties' freedom of meaning, etc. Become the first choice of modern economic dispute resolution. The arbitration system has a long history and can be traced back to the ancient Roman period. The arbitration system was formally established in England in 1697. Over the centuries, the arbitration system has gradually developed from the original folklore and simplicity to internationalization through continuous development and perfection. The arbitration system of China has developed rapidly since the promulgation of Arbitration Law. In just ten years, more than 200 domestic arbitration institutions have been established. The number of cases accepted by arbitration institutions is also on the rise year by year. However, with the further development of economy, some existing arbitration systems in China can not meet the needs of modern dispute resolution, nor can they be unified with the international development trend of arbitration. Sri Lanka, as a developing country in South Asia, was once a British colony, but at the same time it inherited the legal characteristics of the common law system. When the civil war in Sri Lanka officially ended in 2009, the government began to pay attention to the development of the domestic economy. As an important way to solve international commercial disputes, arbitration naturally becomes the focus of attention. The arbitration legal system of Sri Lanka is deeply influenced by Anglo-American law system, and at the same time, the arbitration system with its own characteristics is formed by drawing lessons from the international advanced system. In view of this, this article will take the Sri Lankan arbitration law as the comparative blueprint, in the introduction Sri Lanka arbitration system simultaneously, pays close attention to the international arbitration system development tendency, carries on the comparison with our country present arbitration system. The article is divided into four parts: the first part introduces the advantages of arbitration in modern dispute resolution mechanism compared with other systems, the second part focuses on the development characteristics of arbitration legal system between China and Sri Lanka. The third part focuses on the comparison of some problems in the specific arbitration system of the two countries, such as arbitration principles, arbitration procedures and judicial supervision of arbitration, from which the defects of the existing arbitration system in China are found. In order to promote the modernization of China's arbitration system, the author puts forward some specific countermeasures and suggestions on the problems in China's arbitration system found in the course of comparison.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.7;D935.8

【相似文献】