清代诉讼概念框架中的“民事刑事”

发布时间：2018-06-05 02:02

  本文选题：清代诉讼 + 四民社会　； 参考：《学术交流》2017年04期

【摘要】：在清代诉讼研究领域,无论是既有的"民事刑事"概念,抑或是近年来逐步取代前者的概念,如"重情细事"等,都未能完全摆脱二元对立的观念、形成恰当的诉讼分类。要突破这一学术瓶颈,则应对相关的概念框架进行反思,从而厘清史实,整合零碎化的经验研究成果。立足于"四民社会"理解"民词",有益于展现概念所处的逻辑关系,并认识清代诉讼在不同时空下的内在张力。以"政务"观念诠释"自理案件"与"会审案件",能促进排除与史实不符的观念影响,并勾绘传统中国司法的完整版图。从"国进民退"视角看待清代州县诉讼,可展现具体社会实态下的法制运作,并形成着眼于社会整体的法史学研究范式。
[Abstract]:In the field of litigation research in Qing Dynasty, either the existing concept of "civil criminal" or the concept of replacing the former gradually in recent years, such as "attaching importance to feelings and details", can not completely get rid of the concept of dualistic opposition and form a proper classification of litigation. In order to break through this academic bottleneck, we should reflect on the relevant conceptual framework to clarify the historical facts and integrate the piecemeal empirical research results. Based on the understanding of "people's ci" in "four people's Society", it is beneficial to show the logical relationship of the concept and to understand the internal tension of litigation in different time and space in Qing Dynasty. The interpretation of "self-care cases" and "trial cases" by the concept of "government affairs" can promote the exclusion of the influence of ideas that do not conform to the historical facts, and draw a complete picture of the traditional Chinese judicature. Looking at the state and county litigation in the Qing Dynasty from the angle of "the country advances into the people and retreats", it can show the legal system operation under the concrete social reality and form the research paradigm of the history of law focusing on the society as a whole.
【作者单位】： 四川大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“民国时期荣县档案整理与研究”(13&ZD152)
【分类号】：D929
，

本文编号：1979920