哈特与德沃金：自由裁量观比较分析
发布时间：2018-07-24 17:54
【摘要】：新分析实证主义法学创始人哈特在坚持法律与道德概念分离的基础上,从描述性视角出发、以社会学方法辅之以语义学方法,构建出法律体系的开放结构理论、“承认规则”理论和自由裁量理论等构成的自洽体系。而与其理论建构和修正几乎同步发展的是美国当代著名法理学家罗纳德?德沃金教授的整体性道德理论。源于对法律与道德本体论属性定位的差异,德沃金对法律体系的完整性、范围界定和自由裁量理论等诸多方面进行了与哈特截然相反的阐释。本文以哈特与德沃金就法与道德关系的争论为起点,梳理相关的理论内容,分析相关争点,重点比较研究二者的自由裁量观,并就各自的积极意义进行总结,以期对司法实践进行更为有益的指导。
[Abstract]:On the basis of the separation of legal and moral concepts, Hart, the founder of New Analytical positivist Law, sets up the open structure theory of the legal system from the perspective of description, supplemented by the sociological method and the semantic method. The theory of rules of recognition and the theory of discretion constitute a self-consistent system. And it is Ronald, a famous contemporary American jurist, who develops almost simultaneously with his theoretical construction and revision. Professor Dworkin's holistic moral theory. Derived from the differences in the orientation of the attributes of legal and moral ontology, Dworkin interprets the integrity of legal system, the definition of scope and the theory of discretion in a completely opposite way to Hart's. This paper begins with the controversy between Hart and Dworkin on the relationship between law and morality, combs the relevant theoretical contents, analyzes the relevant points of contention, compares and studies their discretion views, and summarizes their respective positive meanings. In order to conduct more beneficial guidance to the judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D909.1
本文编号：2142183
[Abstract]:On the basis of the separation of legal and moral concepts, Hart, the founder of New Analytical positivist Law, sets up the open structure theory of the legal system from the perspective of description, supplemented by the sociological method and the semantic method. The theory of rules of recognition and the theory of discretion constitute a self-consistent system. And it is Ronald, a famous contemporary American jurist, who develops almost simultaneously with his theoretical construction and revision. Professor Dworkin's holistic moral theory. Derived from the differences in the orientation of the attributes of legal and moral ontology, Dworkin interprets the integrity of legal system, the definition of scope and the theory of discretion in a completely opposite way to Hart's. This paper begins with the controversy between Hart and Dworkin on the relationship between law and morality, combs the relevant theoretical contents, analyzes the relevant points of contention, compares and studies their discretion views, and summarizes their respective positive meanings. In order to conduct more beneficial guidance to the judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D909.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 贾敬华;;司法自由裁量权的现实分析[J];河北法学;2006年04期
2 马得华;;哈特、德沃金尚自由裁量权[J];行政与法(吉林省行政学院学报);2006年S1期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 唐文;[N];人民法院报;2002年
，本文编号：2142183
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/falilunwen/2142183.html
