欧洲基本权利保护的理论与方法——以比例原则为例

发布时间：2018-10-17 11:32

【摘要】：对法律与国家的不同理解一如既往地存在于欧盟内部所有的"共同遗产"与"价值共同体"的修辞学中。德国法中法律是优先于政治的,而英国更注重保持开放的政治空间与限制司法权,近些年来特别是从GCHQ案到1998年《人权法案》颁布以来英国法展现给我们的是一幅惊人的变化图景,其已开始接纳比例原则。法国法对比例原则并不是公开地接受,而是以不同的本土标准逐步地适应欧洲标准。由于比例原则提供了灵活性与可诉性,特别是出于结构性与制度性的原因,比例原则在欧洲层面是必需的。作为法院的监督标准,比例原则会强化法律的优先性,并且导致民主与法治关系的结构性重组。欧洲法院对成员国议会行为的监督已不可避免,民主的思维应当在基本权利保护中展开。
[Abstract]:Differences in understanding of law and state persist in the rhetoric of all common legacies and communities of value within the EU. German law takes precedence over politics, while Britain pays more attention to maintaining an open political space and restricting judicial power. In recent years, especially from the GCHQ case to the enactment of the Human Rights Act in 1998, English law has shown us an amazing picture of change, which has begun to accept the principle of proportionality. The principle of proportionality in French law is not openly accepted, but gradually adapted to European standards with different local standards. Since the principle of proportionality provides flexibility and justiciability, especially for structural and institutional reasons, the principle of proportionality is necessary at the European level. As the supervision standard of the court, the principle of proportionality will strengthen the priority of law and lead to the structural reorganization of the relationship between democracy and rule of law. The European Court of Justice's oversight of the actions of member parliaments is inevitable, and democratic thinking should be carried out in the protection of fundamental rights.
【作者单位】：德国明斯特大学;北京大学法学院;
【基金】：中国国家留学基金的资助
【分类号】：D95

【相似文献】