对最高法院对尼泊尔仲裁裁决的干预的批判性分析

发布时间：2021-10-17 13:03

　　尼泊尔仲裁程序面临的主要阻碍就是司法干预。尼泊尔最高法院通过曲解法律规定,获得对仲裁裁决的多重管辖权。根据尼泊尔《仲裁法》的规定,当事人获得仲裁裁决后,不满仲裁裁决的一方可以到高等法院提出异议,高等法院可以在两种情形下宣布仲裁裁决无效。第一个是,如果仲裁员解决的争议无法通过尼泊尔法律的仲裁解决。第二种情形是,如果仲裁员做出的裁决有损于公共利益或者公共政策。除了这些理由之外,尼泊尔法律没有预见法院对仲裁裁决行使管辖权的其他任何条件。然而,尽管缺乏明确的法律规定,最高法院也受理了不同的管辖权,即上诉和令状。这样就导致这些裁决需要通过司法程序解决,有时候甚至需要将近20年的时间。商事仲裁的优势在于其快速、非正式、有专业裁判团和能够保护商业秘密。但是,过度的司法干预会破坏仲裁精神。 

【文章来源】：华东政法大学上海市

【文章页数】：69 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Abstract
中文摘要
Abbreviations
Chapter One:General Introduction
    1.1 Background of the Research
        1.1.1 Arbitration Regimes in Nepal
        1.1.2 Judicial Review of the Arbitral Award
        1.1.3 Judicial Intervention over the Arbitral Award
    1.2 Research Questions
    1.3 Significance of Research
    1.4 Methodology of Research
    1.5 Literature Review
    1.6 Limitation of Research
    1.7 Structure of the Research
Chapter Two:Legal Framework for the Jurisdiction of the Court on Arbitral Awards
    2.1 Domestic Laws
        2.1.1 Constitution of Nepal
        2.1.2 Administration of Justice Act
        2.1.3 Arbitration Act of Nepal
    2.2 International Laws
        2.2.1 New York Convention1958,Article V
        2.2.2 UNCITRAL Model Law
Chapter Three:Supreme Court’s intervention Over Arbitral Awards:Case Analysis
    3.1 Appeal to the Supreme Court:Jurisdiction without Laws
        3.1.1 Case:Vijaya Construction Company v.Central Bank of Nepal
        3.1.2 Analysis
    3.2 Writ Petition:Out of Frying Pan into the Fire
        3.2.1 Case:Agriculture Inputs Corporation(AIC)v.Sumit Prakash Asia Pvt.Ltd. (SPA)
        3.2.2 Analysis
        3.2.3 Case:Nepal Airlines Cooperation v.Haarati Travels and Tours
        3.2.4 Analysis
    3.3 Supreme Court’s Review of its own Previous Judgments:Example of Extreme Intervention
        3.3.1 Case:Ministry of Finance Nepal v.Damodar Ropeways and Construction Company
        3.3.2 Analysis
    3.4 Two Round Review by the Supreme Court and the High Court:Travel on the Vicious Cycle
        3.4.1 Case Analysis:Bridge Line Corporation v.Agricultural Inputs Corporation
    3.5 Consequences of Supreme Court’s Intervention over Arbitral Awards
        3.5.1 Degrade the Principle of Finality
        3.5.2 Risky for Defeating the Whole Arbitration Process
Chapter Four:Recommendations for Improvement
    4.1 Supreme Court Can Overrule Existing Precedent by Higher Bench
    4.2 Legislative Can amend laws that can limit the Supreme Court’s Intervention
Chapter Five:Conclusion
Bibliography
Acknowledgement



本文编号：3441809