中欧竞争法视野下的企业合并规制比较

发布时间：2018-01-21 12:12

本文关键词： 企业合并反垄断法欧盟企业合并控制条例　出处：《华东政法大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 企业合并,是企业发展到一定阶段后实施快速扩张的有效途径,其克服了渐进式发展的局限,为企业跳跃式发展提供了一定的可能,可以说西方工业发展史就是企业合并的历史;而我国的企业合并发展于20世纪80年代中期,由于时间短,不规范的情况时有发生,因此统一规范企业合并法规的出台十分重要。我国于2007年8月30日颁布了《反垄断法》,并于2008年8月1日正式实施,其与《关于外国投资者并购境内企业的规定》共同规制我国境内的企业合并。反垄断不是中国特有的法律文化,在一百多年的历史中,有80余个国家颁布实施了竞争法,其中欧盟的反垄断法具有典型意义,同时随着经济全球化与市场的扩大,反垄断法越来越有跨国的性质。鉴于此,中国反垄断法应该在考虑国情的前提下,借鉴欧盟的立法经验。中国在颁布《反垄断法》之前,企业合并的现象已经十分普遍。由于缺少统一规制的法规,对企业合并的规制一直处于较为混乱的状态。《反垄断法》的颁布是中国市场经济下的一件大事,我们在肯定其作用的同时,也要关注法规的不完善之处。我们应通过比较研究的方法,与欧盟相关的制度进行对比,进而不断完善我国企业合并领域的法规。本文限于篇幅,主要讨论了在反垄断法框架下的企业合并规制问题,从具体内容框架来看分为以下几个部分:一是简要介绍企业合并中的反垄断问题;二是中国经济发展背景下的企业合并,并对企业合并出现的可能性和必要性进行分析;三是具体对中欧企业合并的反垄断法规制进行比较,从申报门槛、递交材料,实质性审查和豁免条款的区别进行分析;最后对中欧企业合并的背景进行比较,并从不同的市场体系、政府的监管职能、法律体系等方面的不同进行阐述,并提出中国企业合并规制完善的建议。通过比较分析,得出我国的《反垄断法》应该在企业申报合并的标准、机构审查的资料数量、实质审查内容的确定性,豁免条款等方面需要进行完善的结论。只有不断地完善企业合并的法规并加强相关机构的职能作用,我国的企业合并规范才能更加透明、公平。
[Abstract]:Enterprise merger is an effective way to implement rapid expansion after a certain period of development. It overcomes the limitation of gradual development and provides a certain possibility for the leap development of enterprises. It can be said that the history of western industrial development is the history of enterprise merger; However, the merger of enterprises in our country developed in the middle of 1980s. Because of the short time and the irregular situation, it is very important to unify and standardize the laws and regulations of enterprise merger. China promulgated the Anti-monopoly Law on August 30th 2007 and implemented it on August 1st 2008. Together with the regulations on merger and acquisition of domestic Enterprises by Foreign investors, it regulates the merger of enterprises in China. Anti-monopoly is not a unique legal culture in China, and it has been in the history of more than 100 years. More than 80 countries have promulgated and implemented the competition law, among which the EU anti-monopoly law has typical significance. Meanwhile, with the economic globalization and the expansion of the market, the anti-monopoly law is more and more transnational. In view of this. China's anti-monopoly law should take into account the national conditions and learn from the EU's legislative experience. Before the promulgation of the "Anti-monopoly Law", the phenomenon of enterprise merger is already very common in China, because of the lack of uniform regulations. The regulation of enterprise merger has been in a more chaotic state. The promulgation of the Anti-monopoly Law is a major event in China's market economy, and we affirm its role at the same time. We should also pay attention to the imperfections of the laws and regulations. We should compare them with the relevant institutions of the European Union through the method of comparative study, and further improve the laws and regulations in the field of enterprise merger in our country. This paper is limited in space, mainly discusses the regulation of enterprise merger under the framework of anti-monopoly law, which is divided into the following parts from the specific content framework: first, a brief introduction of the anti-monopoly issues in enterprise merger; Secondly, under the background of China's economic development, the paper analyzes the possibility and necessity of enterprise merger. The third is to compare the regulation of anti-monopoly law of enterprise merger between China and Europe, and analyze the difference between the declaration threshold, the submission material, the substantive review and the exemption clause. Finally, the background of Sino-European merger is compared, and the different market system, government supervision function, legal system and so on are discussed, and the suggestions on how to perfect the regulation of Chinese enterprise merger are put forward. Through comparative analysis, we can draw the conclusion that the anti-monopoly law of our country should be based on the standard of enterprise declaration and merger, the quantity of the material of the organization review, and the certainty of the content of the substantive examination. Only by constantly perfecting the laws and regulations of enterprise merger and strengthening the function of relevant institutions, can the criterion of enterprise merger in our country be more transparent and fair.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.294;D95;F271

【引证文献】