霍姆斯的实用主义法律思想述评

发布时间：2018-01-22 03:20

本文关键词： 霍姆斯实用主义法律预测说　出处：《复旦大学》2009年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 本文旨在介绍、分析和评论奥利弗·霍姆斯的实用主义法律思想。全文共分为三章。第一章探讨了霍姆斯的实用主义法律思想的背景。其中,第一节介绍霍姆斯的生平和他的主要论著。第二节主要分析霍姆斯所处的时代的实用主义哲学思想,通过对同时代的实用主义哲学家的述评,展现霍姆斯的实用主义法律思想的哲学渊源和思想源泉。第三节分析霍姆斯的实用主义法律思想的时代背景,并从19世纪70年代至第一次世界大战以前美国社会面临的文化变迁和社会转型角度展现了这一背景的复杂和深刻性。第二章从三个方面剖析霍姆斯实用主义法律思想的基本内容,即他的怀疑主义的法律认识论、将法律视为对司法判决之预测的法律本体论、重视经验的法律方法论。霍姆斯的认识论主要表现出怀疑主义的特点,该特点影响到他对法律本体的看法。霍姆斯认为,法律的本质是对于法官如何行事的预测,而这种预测应该是剥离了道德色彩以后的进行的。这种观点被概括为法律的预测说和“坏人”之视角理论。本章最后还涉及霍姆斯有关经验和逻辑关系的思想,分析了霍姆斯有关司法判断过程和法律方法论方面的观点,说明了霍姆斯的实用主义法律方法论是一种重视经验作用的方法论。第三章分析了霍姆斯实用主义法律思想的影响并对该思想进行了简要的评论。霍姆斯的实用主义法律思想影响深远,在法学理论方面的直接表现是法律现实主义和法经济学对这一思想的继承和发展。同时,在美国司法理论方面,霍姆斯也留下了深刻的影响,该影响尤其体现在言论自由的几个讼案上。最后,论文对霍姆斯的实用主义法律思想进行了简要的评价。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to introduce, analyze and comment on Oliver Holmes' pragmatic legal thought. The first chapter discusses the background of Holmes' pragmatism legal thought. The first section introduces Holmes' life and his main works. The second section mainly analyzes the philosophy of pragmatism in which Holmes lives. Through the commentary of contemporary pragmatism philosophers, it shows the philosophical origin and ideological source of Holmes' pragmatic legal thought. The third section analyzes the background of Holmes' pragmatism legal thought. The cultural changes and social transformation in American society from 1870s to World War I reveal the complexity and depth of this background. The second chapter analyzes the basic content of Holmes' pragmatism legal thought from three aspects, namely his skepticism legal epistemology, regards the law as the legal ontology which predicts the judicial judgment. Empirical legal methodology. Holmes' epistemology is characterized by skepticism, which affects his view of legal ontology. The essence of law is the prediction of how judges act. This kind of prediction is supposed to be carried out after the moral color has been removed. This view is summarized as the theory of legal prediction and the theory of "bad man". At the end of this chapter, it also deals with Holmes' thoughts on experience and logical relationship. This paper analyzes Holmes' views on the process of judicial judgment and legal methodology, and explains that Holmes' pragmatic legal methodology is a methodology that attaches importance to the role of experience. The third chapter analyzes the influence of Holmes' pragmatic legal thought and makes a brief comment on it. The direct expression in the legal theory is the inheritance and development of the thought from the legal realism and the law economics. At the same time, Holmes has also left a profound influence on the judicial theory of the United States. This influence is especially reflected in several cases of freedom of speech. Finally, the thesis makes a brief evaluation of Holmes' pragmatic legal thought.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D909

【参考文献】