新加坡扣船新发展——评新加坡上诉庭the“Bunge Melati 5”案

发布时间：2018-01-27 23:25

本文关键词： 扣船海事管辖权非必然败诉案件　出处：《中国海商法研究》2013年01期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：长久以来,对新加坡扣船的条件和相关证明标准没有形成统一认识,当事人在扣船案件中经常产生争议。在介绍新加坡扣船案例——the"Bunge Melati 5"案的基础上,回顾了新加坡扣船应适用的法律条文规定,结合相关法律条文规定和新加坡上诉庭2008年所作重要扣船判例the"Vasiliy Golovnin"案,厘清了新加坡上诉庭在本案判决中阐述的索赔人在新加坡申请扣船应采取的五个基本步骤及其相应的证明标准。最后,对新加坡扣船应履行的披露义务和错误扣船损害赔偿责任认定标准进行了简要讨论,并得出结论:出于维护全球扣船中心的地位和避免法院陷入大量无依据扣船案件的泥潭的目的,新加坡法院通过这些案例对扣船争议中当事人的权利和义务进行平衡。
[Abstract]:For a long time, there has been no unified understanding of the conditions of arrest and the relevant standards of certification in Singapore. The parties often have disputes in the arrest case. Based on the introduction of the Singapore arrest case, the "Bunge Melati 5" case. The provisions of the law applicable to arrest of ships in Singapore are recalled. In conjunction with the relevant legal provisions and the important arrest of ships case the "Vasiliy Golovnin" made by the Singapore Court of Appeal on 2008. The five basic steps to be taken by a claimant in Singapore to apply for arrest of a ship and the corresponding standard of proof were clarified in the judgement of the Singapore Court of Appeal in the present case. This paper briefly discusses the disclosure obligations to be performed by Singapore and the criteria for determining the liability for damages caused by false arrest of ships. It is concluded that in order to maintain the status of the global arrest centre and to avoid the court from falling into the quagmire of a large number of unwarranted arrest cases. In these cases, the Singapore courts balance the rights and obligations of the parties in the arrest dispute.
【作者单位】：武汉大学法学院;新加坡立杰律师事务所驻上海代表处;
【分类号】：D933.9
【正文快照】： 一、基本案情本案是有关燃油供应款的索赔纠纷。上诉人是新加坡一家燃油供应公司,被上诉人是马来西亚的船东。2010年2月5日,上诉人在新加坡法院提起“对物诉讼”(action in rem),扣押了被上诉人所属的“BungaMelati5”轮。上诉人诉称其通过经纪人与①参见The“Bunge Melati 5

【参考文献】