美国惩罚性赔偿制度对完善我国市场监管法的借鉴

发布时间：2018-01-28 10:38

本文关键词： 惩罚性赔偿金惩罚性赔偿制度补偿性赔偿中华人民共和国市场监管消费者权益保护法食品安全法赔偿数额公益诉讼原告　出处：《法学》2013年10期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：正惩罚性赔偿是在补偿性赔偿的基础上,再追加一个额外的赔偿;补偿性赔偿意在弥补受害人遭受的损害。惩罚性赔偿的目的不在于补偿受害人,而在于威慑违法行为人,以使他以及其他违法者今后不再从事类似的行为。这对于惩治当前猖獗的市场违法行为,塑造良好的市场秩序,功效甚巨。我国早在1993年制定的《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》中就引入了惩罚性赔偿制度,惩罚性赔偿数额为"消费者购买商品的价款或者接受服务的费用的一倍"(该法第49条)。该惩罚性赔偿制度的实施对于遏制市场上的欺诈行为虽有一定的作用,但在具体司法实践中也遭遇到了不少的阻力和争执。此外,仅一倍的惩罚性赔偿倍数太低,不足以鼓励私人诉讼、遏制不法行为。因此,在该法实施了二十年后的今天,立法机关正酝酿对这一条款进行修改与完善。
[Abstract]:On the basis of compensatory damages, positive punitive damages is to add an additional compensation; The purpose of punitive damages is not to compensate the victims, but to deter the offenders. So that he and other violators will not engage in similar acts in the future. This is to punish the current rampant market violations, create a good market order. As early as 1993, China introduced the punitive damages system in the Law of the people's Republic of China on the Protection of Consumer Rights and interests. Punitive damages are "double the price of a consumer's purchase of a good or the cost of receiving a service" (art. 49 of the Act). The implementation of the punitive damages system has a certain role in curbing fraud in the market. But in the specific judicial practice also encountered a lot of resistance and dispute. In addition, only one time of punitive damages is too low, not enough to encourage private litigation, curb illegal conduct. Twenty years after the implementation of the Act, the legislature is preparing to amend and improve this provision.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“走向规则的经济法原理”(13FFX009)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D971.2;D923.8;D922.16
【正文快照】： 惩罚性赔偿是在补偿性赔偿的基础上,再追加一个额外的赔偿;补偿性赔偿意在弥补受害人遭受的损害。惩罚性赔偿的目的不在于补偿受害人,而在于威慑违法行为人,以使他以及其他违法者今后不再从事类似的行为。这对于惩治当前猖獗的市场违法行为,塑造良好的市场秩序,功效甚巨。我国

【参考文献】