裁判理论的普遍谬误:为法教义学辩护

发布时间：2018-01-29 13:29

本文关键词： 裁判理论教义学法律论证　出处：《清华法学》2012年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：当前的裁判理论都依赖一个形式主义的普遍预设,认为在法律不确定的条件下,疑难案件的裁判不再是法律裁决,而是非法律的自由裁量。不同的裁判理论是对这一普遍预设的不同回应。教义学理论拒绝接受这一普遍预设,坚持疑难案件裁判的法律属性,进而捍卫法律的自治性。教义学理论能为疑难案件的裁决提供理论上可行、规范上可欲、实证上充分的说明。教义学理论以法律论证场域为基础,而法律论证场域又有其特殊的教义学结构,这一结构能够确保疑难案件裁判的法律属性。法律论证场域创造了裁决人与具体当事人的经济、政治或道德利益的距离,而这一距离又保障了公平裁判。法律论证场域是社会分化的结果,是社会时代变迁而孕育的文化成就。
[Abstract]:The current common presupposition referee theory are dependent on a formalism, that in the uncertain legal conditions, difficult cases the referee is no longer legal rulings, but non discretionary law. Different judicial theory is the prevailing presupposition of different response. Doctrine theory rejects the common presupposition adhere to the judicial, legal attribute, and defend the autonomy of law. Doctrine theory can for the difficult case to provide theoretically feasible, norms to explain fully. The empirical doctrine and theory to legal argumentation field as a basis, and legal argumentation field has its special doctrine the structure, this structure can ensure the legal attributes of judicial legal argumentation. The field created the adjudicator and specific parties of economic, political or moral interests of the distance, and this distance and ensure fair discretion The field of legal argumentation is the result of social differentiation, and it is a cultural achievement bred in the change of social times.

【作者单位】：德国弗莱堡大学法学院;清华大学法学院;
【分类号】：D90
【正文快照】： 一、裁判理论及其普遍预设(一)作为法律核心的裁判法律,事关裁判。作为社会系统的法律核心是裁判,〔1〕而法律实践、法律咨询、审判、诉讼程序和法学亦无一不涉及裁判。反过来,裁判又均与疑难案件有关。尽管从数量上来看,疑难案件属于偶发现象,但疑难案件既是裁判的核心,也是

【相似文献】