新西兰体育仲裁制度探析

发布时间：2018-01-31 04:49

本文关键词： 体育纠纷新西兰体育仲裁庭仲裁程序仲裁规则　出处：《湘潭大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 在诸多的体育纠纷解决方式中,仲裁的优势是显而易见的。其程序简便,具有较强的时效性,而且收费低,专业性与保密性较强,这些都迎合了体育纠纷解决所必须的要求。我国体育法第三十三条规定:“在竞技体育活动中发生的纠纷,由体育仲裁机构负责调解、仲裁。”该规定在法律中明确了体育仲裁可以作为体育纠纷的有效解决方式,但对于如何具体运用仲裁这一法律手段来解决体育领域的纠纷,我国至今尚未建立统一的体育仲裁法律规范体系。笔者认为在构建我国体育仲裁制度时,不仅应该全面考虑我国体育界现有的基本情况,而且也应该多注意学习和借鉴外国在此方面的一些优良成果。希望本文通过对新西兰体育仲裁庭的研究,能从中学习和借鉴其体育仲裁制度中的一些优点。新西兰体育仲裁庭有一套较为完善的仲裁制度,笔者首先分析了新西兰体育与体育立法概况、体育纠纷的基本理论,然后重点介绍了该仲裁庭的设置、运作情况、仲裁规则。该仲裁庭对处理体育纠纷规定了三种不同的仲裁程序,笔者对这三种程序做了详细具体的介绍。自2003年新西兰体育仲裁庭成立以来,其受理了近百起案件,绝大多数是与兴奋剂有关的案件及运动员对协会内部裁决不服提起上诉的案件,该仲裁庭在处理这些纠纷时充分体现了仲裁的优势。本文试通过对仲裁庭审理的其中一些具体案件的分析来阐述其对体育法原则的维护和发展。我国体育领域的纠纷解决机制存在着许多不足之处,仲裁机构严重行政化,解决体育纠纷时应当遵循的“公开、公平、公正”原则在进行仲裁时未能得到很好地贯彻和维护。希望通过借鉴新西兰体育仲裁庭的成功经验,能对建立中国体育仲裁机制有所帮助,以促进我国体育事业的发展。
[Abstract]:In many sports dispute resolution, the advantage of arbitration is obvious. Its procedure is simple, has strong timeliness, and charges low, professional and confidentiality is strong. All these meet the requirements of sports dispute resolution. Article 33th of China's Sports Law stipulates: "disputes in competitive sports activities shall be mediated by the sports arbitration institution." Arbitration... "this provision clearly in the law sports arbitration can be used as an effective way to resolve sports disputes, but how to specifically use the legal means of arbitration to solve sports disputes. China has not yet established a unified sports arbitration legal normative system. The author believes that in the construction of China's sports arbitration system, we should not only consider the existing basic situation of sports in our country. Moreover, we should pay more attention to learn from and draw lessons from some good achievements of foreign countries in this respect. I hope this paper can learn from the New Zealand Sports Arbitration Tribunal and learn from some advantages of its sports arbitration system. The New Zealand Sports Arbitration Tribunal has a set of relatively perfect arbitration system. Firstly, the author analyzes the general situation of New Zealand sports and sports legislation, the basic theory of sports disputes, and then focuses on the establishment of the arbitration tribunal. The arbitration tribunal has stipulated three different arbitration procedures to deal with sports disputes, and the author has made a detailed introduction to these three procedures. Since the establishment of the New Zealand Sports Arbitration Tribunal in 2003, it has accepted nearly 100 cases, the vast majority of which are cases relating to stimulants and cases in which athletes have appealed against the Association's internal rulings. In dealing with these disputes, the arbitration tribunal fully embodies the advantages of arbitration. This paper tries to explain the maintenance and development of the principles of sports law through the analysis of some of the specific cases heard by the arbitral tribunal. There are many deficiencies in the dispute resolution mechanism in the field of sports in our country. The arbitration institution is seriously administrated, and the "openness and fairness" should be followed when resolving sports disputes. The principle of justice has not been well carried out and maintained in arbitration. It is hoped that the successful experience of New Zealand sports arbitration tribunal will be helpful to the establishment of Chinese sports arbitration mechanism. In order to promote the development of sports in China.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D961.2;DD915.7

【相似文献】