东亚成年监护制度的比较

发布时间：2018-03-03 06:06

本文选题：东亚　切入点：成年监护　出处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2013年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：日本、韩国、中国台湾地区对法定监护都采取了区分类型保护的模式。中国学者梁慧星教授的民法草案第二次建议稿也采取了同样的模式。日本在监护、保佐之外新设了辅助这一成年监护类型。辅助没有限制由于精神障碍而欠缺事理辨析能力的被辅助人的行为能力,被辅助人仍有可能授予辅助人代理权。韩国的特定监护是在被监护人满足成年监护和限定监护的实质要件的情形下,在被监护人对暂时性事务或是特定事务有必须予以辅助的情形时仍然可以请求特定监护。需要注意的是,韩国的特定监护制度不是根据判断能力的衰退程度而决定的阶段性保护类型的一种。任意监护,是允许被监护人为了应对将来的判断能力减退而想在现在早作准备的法律制度。为了保证本人缔结合同时的意思能力,任意监护合同必须要通过公证证书的方式进行。任意监护从选任任意监护监督人时开始生效。通过任意监护监督人的监督来防止任意监护人滥用权限,家庭法院实施间接监督。
[Abstract]:Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan have all adopted the model of distinguishing between types of guardianship. The second draft of the civil law proposed by Chinese scholar Liang Huixing has also adopted the same model. Japan is in guardianship. A new type of adult guardianship has been set up in addition to Paul. Assistive assistance does not limit the ability of the assisted person to act as a result of mental disorder. It is still possible for the assisted person to grant the assistive agent power of attorney. The specific guardianship in Korea is provided that the guardian satisfies the substantive requirements of adult guardianship and limited guardianship, You can still request specific guardianship when the guardian is required to assist with a temporary transaction or a particular transaction. It is important to note that, Korea's specific guardianship system is not one of the types of periodic protection that is determined by the degree of decline in judgment. It is a legal system that allows the guardian to prepare himself early now in order to cope with the decline in his ability to judge in the future. In order to ensure his ability to mean when he enters into a contract, Arbitrary guardianship contract must be carried out by means of notarization certificate. Arbitrary guardianship comes into effect from the time of appointment of arbitrary guardianship supervisor. Through the supervision of arbitrary guardianship supervisor to prevent abuse of authority by arbitrary guardian, the family court carries out indirect supervision.
【作者单位】：日本学习院大学法学部;吉林大学法学院;
【分类号】：D913

【相似文献】