反补贴法律制度下美国“不利推定”原则研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 14:49

本文选题：“不利推定” + 反补贴　；参考：《华东政法大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 本文主要是对反补贴下美国适用“可获得事实”的“不利推定”原则的研究。本文考察了“不利推定”原则适用的背景,在美国法律制度下的立法状况以及其国际法渊源,并且在援引了大量美国国内以及世贸组织案例的基础上分析了该原则的具体内容、适用标准以及对中国的影响。以此提出我国应对美国适用“不利推定”原则的法律策略,以及对今后我国运用“不利推定”原则进行反补贴调查的借鉴。本文分五章。导言主要阐述了论文选题的动机、意义及美国适用“不利推定”的背景。第一章,“不利推定”原则的法律渊源。本章先通过一系列数据介绍了“不利推定”原则被频繁地使用的情况,随后通过剖析“不利推定”的美国国内法渊源和国际法渊源阐明了其产生及发展的过程。第二章,“不利推定”原则的法律研究。本章详细阐述了“不利推定”的含义,并指出其分为“部分不利推定”及“全部不利推定”。“不利推定”的制度价值在于防止利害关系方不予配合进而损害调查机关的调查;同时,调查的整个过程需要利害关系方的合作以及调查机关的配合义务,“不利推定”在调查机关与利害关系方中起到了不可或缺的平衡作用。最后,本章指出“不利推定”在多哈发展议程中得到了修订与完善。第三章,反补贴下美国适用“不利推定”原则的法律分析。本章阐明了美国对中国适用“不利推定”原则的法律问题,并且分析了美国对中国频繁适用“不利推定”原则的内在原因。第四章,中国应对美国适用“不利推定”原则的法律策略。从应诉角度来讲,我国政府及企业应尽最大努力搜集详实的对中方有利的信息作证,全面认真回答调查问卷并接受岁答卷的核查,另外企业及政府部门应积极配合;本章还通过案例鼓励企业利用美国贸易审查机制来挑战美国商务部的争议性做法;通过申诉至世贸组织表明美国法有关“不利推定”原则对世贸组织规则的违反来维护自身的权益。第五章中国政府在反补贴调查运用“不利推定”原则的借鉴意义。针对美国在反补贴调查中频繁适用“不利推定”原则的情形,我国首先应完善现行的《反补贴条例》,进而采取相关的贸易保护救济来维护我国政府和企业的合法权益。
[Abstract]:This paper is mainly about the application of the "unfavorable presumption" principle of "available facts" in the United States under countervailing. This paper examines the background of the application of the "adverse presumption" principle, the legislative status under the United States legal system and its sources of international law, and analyzes the specific contents of the principle on the basis of a large number of domestic and WTO cases. Applicable standards and impact on China. This paper puts forward the legal strategy that our country should apply the principle of "unfavorable presumption" to the United States, as well as the reference of countervailing investigation on the application of the principle of "unfavorable presumption" in our country in the future. This paper is divided into five chapters. The introduction mainly expounds the motivation and significance of the thesis and the background of the application of unfavorable presumption in the United States. The first chapter is the legal origin of the principle of adverse presumption. This chapter first introduces the frequent use of the principle of "adverse presumption" through a series of data, and then explains the process of its emergence and development by analyzing the sources of American domestic law and international law of the "adverse presumption". The second chapter is the legal study of the principle of adverse presumption. This chapter elaborates the meaning of "unfavorable presumption", and points out that it is divided into "partial adverse presumption" and "all adverse presumption". The institutional value of the "adverse presumption" lies in preventing stakeholders from failing to cooperate and thereby undermining the investigation of the investigative authority; at the same time, the whole process of the investigation requires the cooperation of the stakeholders and the obligation of the investigative authority to cooperate, The presumption of disadvantage plays an indispensable balancing role between the investigative authorities and stakeholders. Finally, this chapter points out that the adverse presumption has been revised and improved in the Doha Development agenda. The third chapter is the legal analysis of the application of the "adverse presumption" principle in the United States under countervailing. This chapter clarifies the legal problems of the application of the "adverse presumption" principle to China by the United States, and analyzes the internal reasons for the frequent application of the "adverse presumption" principle to China by the United States. The fourth chapter, China should apply the "adverse presumption" principle of the United States legal strategy. From the point of view of responding to the complaint, our government and enterprises should do their best to collect detailed and beneficial information for China to testify, answer the questionnaire and accept the verification of the year old questionnaire, in addition, enterprises and government departments should cooperate actively; This chapter also encourages enterprises to use the US Trade Review Mechanism to challenge the controversial practices of the US Department of Commerce. To protect one's rights and interests by appealing to the WTO to show the violation of the "presumption of unfavorable" principle in American law. The fifth chapter is the significance of using the principle of "unfavorable presumption" in countervailing investigation. In view of the frequent application of the "adverse presumption" principle in the countervailing investigation in the United States, our country should first perfect the existing "countervailing regulations", and then take relevant trade protection remedies to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of our government and enterprises.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：DD912.29;D971.2;D996.1

【参考文献】