反垄断法损害赔偿制度中韩两国比较

发布时间：2018-06-22 20:30

本文选题：反垄断法 + 私人实施　；参考：《华东政法大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 2008年8月1日《中华人民共和国反垄断法》正式实施,该法初步确立了反垄断法损害赔偿制度。然而遗憾的是,《反垄断法》对于其中的损害赔偿制度规定较为简单,这给法律的实施带来了很大的不便,亟待给予更为具体的规定。韩国《垄断规制法》于1981年便正式实施,竞争执法机构已积累了丰富的经验。因而,韩国反垄断法损害赔偿制度的实践和研究都相对深入。为了激发反垄断法损害赔偿诉讼等反垄断法私人执行措施,2004年韩国对《垄断规制法》进行了修改,废止了审决前置程序执行的制度,同时采用了认定损害赔偿金额制度等。韩国《垄断规制法》私人执行,特别是损害赔偿制度的实施与修改,对中国反垄断法损害赔偿制度的具体构建和实施具有重要的借鉴意义。因此,可以通过比较和分析中国《反垄断法》与韩国《垄断规制法》关于损害赔偿制度的异同,就中国如何完善反垄断法损害赔偿制度提出相关建议。第一部分,反垄断法损害赔偿制度的概述。该部分介绍了损害赔偿制度的概念、功能及类型,论述了反垄断法的损害赔偿制度与民法的损害赔偿制度之间的区别与联系。第二部分,中韩反垄断法损害赔偿制度对比。介绍了中韩两国的反垄断法损害赔偿制度现状,同时分析了两国的反垄断法损害赔偿制度上存在的缺陷。第三部分,韩国反垄断损害赔偿制度具体研究,详细分析了韩国的反垄断法损害赔偿请求制度,进一步介绍韩国反垄断法损害赔偿制度的特色,如韩国的损害赔偿金额认定制度和修改前的审决前置程序。第四部分,以韩为鉴,完善中国反垄断法损害赔偿制度。该部分首先分析了中国反垄断法损害赔偿制度构建的必要性,并论述了中韩两国在反垄断损害赔偿制度间的可借鉴性。然后从原告被告主体资格、双倍赔偿制度,管辖法院等方面提出完善中国反垄断法损害赔偿制度的建议。
[Abstract]:The Anti-monopoly Law of the people's Republic of China was put into effect on August 1, 2008. However, it is a pity that the anti-monopoly law has a relatively simple stipulation on the system of compensation for damages, which brings great inconvenience to the implementation of the law, and needs to be stipulated more concretely. Korea's monopoly regulation law was formally implemented in 1981, and the competition law enforcement agencies have accumulated rich experience. Therefore, the practice and research of the damage compensation system of Korean anti-monopoly law are relatively deep. In order to stimulate the private enforcement measures of anti-monopoly law, such as lawsuit for damages in anti-monopoly law, Korea amended the Monopoly Regulation Law in 2004, abolished the system of execution of pre-procedure of trial decision, and adopted the system of determining the amount of compensation for damages and so on. The private enforcement of Korea's Monopoly Regulation Law, especially the implementation and modification of the damage compensation system, is of great significance for the concrete construction and implementation of the damage compensation system in China's anti-monopoly law. Therefore, by comparing and analyzing the similarities and differences between China's Anti-monopoly Law and Korea's Monopoly Regulation Law, we can put forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of anti-monopoly law's damage compensation in China. The first part is an overview of the anti-monopoly law damage compensation system. This part introduces the concept, function and type of the damage compensation system, and discusses the difference and relation between the damage compensation system of the anti-monopoly law and the damage compensation system of the civil law. The second part, China and South Korea anti-monopoly law damage compensation system contrast. This paper introduces the present situation of the damage compensation system of the anti-monopoly law in China and South Korea, and analyzes the defects in the damage compensation system of the two countries. The third part, the specific research on the system of antitrust damages in Korea, analyzes in detail the system of claim for damages in South Korea's anti-monopoly law, and further introduces the characteristics of the system of compensation for damages in the anti-monopoly law of Korea. For example, Korea's system of ascertaining damages and pre-revision procedures. The fourth part, take Han as a mirror, consummates the Chinese anti-monopoly law damage compensation system. This part first analyzes the necessity of the construction of the damage compensation system in China's anti-monopoly law, and discusses the reference between China and South Korea in the anti-monopoly compensation system. Then from the plaintiff defendant subject qualification, double compensation system, jurisdiction of the court and other aspects of improving China's anti-monopoly law damage compensation system suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D922.294;D931.26

【相似文献】