唐律伦理立法对我国现行刑法的几点启示
发布时间:2018-06-23 07:44
本文选题:唐律 + 伦理立法 ; 参考:《苏州大学》2009年硕士论文
【摘要】: 唐律是我国封建社会法律制度的集大成者,其立法思想和技术在我国法律史上堪称顶峰,当然唐律也不可避免倾向于保护封建统治阶级,这与唐律的本身属性是分不开的,但即使如此,唐律中有很多立法思想和技术也值得我们学习,来完善现行的法律制度。本文共分四个部分: 第一部分,为引言部分,概要分析了唐律的历史地位和其伦理立法思想和立法制度,也简要叙述了本文的中心目的,即为何要以唐律的伦理思想为蓝本进行对现代刑法的反思。 第二部分,选择了唐律中的分自首、同居相隐、累犯、赎刑、刑事责任能力和职务犯罪等六项法律制度进行了分析,着重梳理了这些制度中所蕴含的伦理道德因素。 第三部分,将现代刑法中的有关制度与唐律中所蕴含的伦理道德因素进行对比分析,进而明确了现代刑法对唐律的具体借鉴方向。 第四部分,为结语部分,强调了唐律的法律地位和其伦理思想,同时也对现代刑法对唐律的伦理立法的借鉴吸收进行了展望。
[Abstract]:Law of Tang Dynasty is the most important part of the legal system of feudal society of our country. Its legislative thought and technology can be called the pinnacle in the legal history of our country. Of course, the law of Tang Dynasty also inevitably tends to protect the feudal ruling class, which is inseparable from the nature of the law of the Tang Dynasty. But even so, there are many legislative ideas and techniques worth learning to improve the current legal system. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is the introduction part, which briefly analyzes the historical position of Tang Dynasty Law, its ethical legislative thought and legislative system, and also briefly describes the central purpose of this article. That is, why should we reflect on the modern criminal law based on the ethical thought of Tang Law. In the second part, the author chooses six legal systems in Tang Dynasty such as surrender, cohabitation, recidivism, foreclosure, criminal responsibility and duty crime, and analyzes the ethical and moral factors contained in these systems. In the third part, the author compares the relevant systems in modern criminal law with the ethical and moral factors contained in Tang Law, and then clarifies the specific reference direction of modern criminal law to Tang Law. The fourth part, as the conclusion part, emphasizes the legal status of Tang Law and its ethics thought, at the same time, it looks forward to the reference and absorption of modern criminal law to the ethical legislation of Tang Law.
【学位授予单位】:苏州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:D929;D924
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 陈长征;马轶伦;;唐代职务犯罪研究[J];山东工商学院学报;2006年05期
2 陈兴良;刑罚目的新论[J];华东政法学院学报;2001年03期
3 任映艳;;从《唐律疏议》看中国古代的孝亲思想[J];兰州交通大学学报;2007年02期
4 范忠信;;中华法系的亲伦精神——以西方法系的市民精神为参照系来认识[J];南京大学法律评论;1999年01期
5 孙奕;;从观念到制度——《唐律》中的容隐制度及其相关问题[J];武汉大学学报(人文科学版);2008年02期
6 王春花;刘再聪;;试论《唐律疏议》中对“疾残”人的政策[J];江南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年04期
7 朱作鑫;论《唐律疏议》中的累犯制度[J];西安文理学院学报(社会科学版);2005年01期
8 苏亦工;;唐律“一准乎礼”辨正[J];政法论坛;2006年03期
9 马建兴;;略论《唐律》中的礼教思想[J];中南大学学报(社会科学版);2003年03期
,本文编号:2056388
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2056388.html