当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 法史论文 >

法哲学核心范畴的反思与重构

发布时间:2018-06-27 14:54

  本文选题:法哲学 + 权利和义务 ; 参考:《山西大学》2009年硕士论文


【摘要】: 法哲学核心范畴是法哲学和法学研究的基础性命题,但我国法学从理论法学到应用法学,其范畴的研究始终是薄弱环节,虽然上世纪末在我国法学界对法哲学核心范畴曾经有过激烈的争论,但总体而言,学界对这一重大理论问题的关注不多,此课题有进一步研究的必要。 本文分为五个部分。 引言部分简要阐述了国内外关于法哲学核心范畴的研究现状,认为学界对于法哲学核心范畴的研究有待加强。指出法哲学核心范畴的研究不仅具有理论意义,是法哲学和法学研究的基础课题,而且具有实践应用价值,可以指导法学实践,使法学理论研究更好地服务于社会主义法治实践。 正文分为三个部分。第一部分阐述了法哲学核心范畴在法哲学范畴体系中的地位和作用。首先厘清了法哲学范畴和范畴体系的含义,然后阐明了法哲学核心范畴的内涵及其特征,最后指出了法哲学核心范畴对法学研究的意义。 第二部分笔者就学界关于法哲学核心范畴的几种具有代表性的观点进行了分析和反思。法的历史类型、权利和义务、社会权利、法律规则和法律关系这五种观点是学界关于法哲学核心范畴的代表性观点,通过对这几种观点的深入分析,结合现今法学实践,笔者指出,应当以法律关系为法哲学的核心范畴。 第三部分就法律关系作为法哲学的核心范畴进行了多方面的构想和论证,是本文的落脚点和重点。这一部分层次分明地论证了法律关系作为法哲学核心范畴的可行性。在理论构想部分主要有三方面内容。首先,赋予法律关系以新的内涵,认为法律关系分为广义和狭义两个方面;然后从三个方面对法律关系作为法哲学核心范畴进行了法哲学体系解构的理论构想,认为可以以法律关系为核心确定法哲学的研究对象。通过论述法律关系与法、法律规范、法律行为等九个法哲学基本范畴的关系,证明法律关系对其具有逻辑的统摄能力,可以以法律关系为核心范畴解构法哲学基本范畴体系。论述了法律关系与公法、私法、社会法的关系,认为以法律关系为核心范畴解构法律部门及其体系也是可行的。 论证部分从六个方面进行了阐述,认为法律关系范畴及其本质是法哲学的根本问题,法律关系范畴是揭示法的内在矛盾与本质的必要前提,法律关系与法哲学基本范畴具有普遍联系并对其具有逻辑统摄功能,法的运行是法律关系的存在和运行过程,法律关系范畴为部门法学的发展指明正确方向,以法律关系为法哲学的核心范畴为研究法律问题提供了正确思路。 结语部分再次重申法哲学核心范畴研究的重要性和法律关系作为法哲学核心范畴的理论和实践价值,指出以法律关系为法哲学的核心范畴可以为研究法学现象,处理司法实践问题提供一个新的视角和思路,是法哲学范畴体系构建中的有益尝试。
[Abstract]:The core category of philosophy of law is the basic proposition of philosophy of law and the study of law, but the study of the category of law in our country has always been a weak link from theoretical jurisprudence to applied jurisprudence. Although there was a heated debate on the core category of philosophy of law at the end of last century, the academic circle paid little attention to this important theoretical issue, so it is necessary to further study this subject. This paper is divided into five parts. The introduction briefly expounds the current research situation of the core category of philosophy of law at home and abroad, and thinks that the research on the core category of philosophy of law needs to be strengthened. It is pointed out that the study of the core category of philosophy of law is not only of theoretical significance, but also a basic subject of the study of philosophy of law and law, and has practical application value, which can guide the practice of law. To make the study of the theory of law better serve the practice of socialist rule of law. The text is divided into three parts. The first part expounds the position and function of the core category of philosophy of law in the category system of philosophy of law. This paper first clarifies the meaning of the category and category system of philosophy of law, then clarifies the connotation and characteristics of the core category of philosophy of law, and finally points out the significance of the core category of philosophy of law to the study of law. In the second part, the author analyses and reflects on several representative viewpoints on the core category of philosophy of law. The historical types of law, rights and obligations, social rights, legal rules and legal relations are the representative views of the academic circle on the core category of legal philosophy. The author points out that legal relationship should be regarded as the core category of legal philosophy. In the third part, legal relation as the core category of philosophy of law is conceived and demonstrated in many aspects, which is the foothold and focus of this paper. This part demonstrates the feasibility of legal relation as the core category of philosophy of law. There are three main contents in the theoretical conception part. First of all, it gives new connotation to legal relationship, which is divided into two aspects: broad sense and narrow sense, and then deconstructs the legal relationship as the core category of legal philosophy from three aspects. The author thinks that the research object of the philosophy of law can be determined by the relation of law. By discussing the relationship between legal relationship and nine basic categories of legal philosophy, such as law, legal norm and legal behavior, it is proved that legal relationship has the logical ability to dominate it, and the legal relationship can be taken as the core category to deconstruct the basic category system of legal philosophy. This paper discusses the relationship between legal relation and public law, private law and social law, and holds that it is feasible to deconstruct the legal department and its system under the core category of legal relationship. The argumentation part expounds from six aspects, thinks that the category and essence of legal relation is the fundamental problem of philosophy of law, and the category of legal relation is the necessary premise to reveal the inherent contradiction and essence of law. The relationship between law and the basic category of philosophy of law is universal and has the function of logical control. The operation of law is the existence and operation process of the legal relationship, and the category of legal relation points out the correct direction for the development of the department of jurisprudence. Taking legal relationship as the core category of legal philosophy provides a correct way to study legal problems. The conclusion restates the importance of the study of the core category of philosophy of law and the theoretical and practical value of the legal relationship as the core category of philosophy of law, and points out that the core category of the philosophy of law can be regarded as the study of the phenomenon of law. To deal with the problem of judicial practice provides a new perspective and train of thought, which is a beneficial attempt in the construction of legal philosophy category system.
【学位授予单位】:山西大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:D90

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 范进学;法学核心范畴关系论——一种比较法的分析[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2001年01期

2 郭道晖;;论法的本质内容与本质形式[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2006年03期

3 童之伟;20世纪上半叶法本位研究之得失[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2000年06期

4 陈金钊;论法学的核心范畴[J];法学评论;2000年02期

5 谢晖;论法律规则[J];广东社会科学;2005年02期

6 陈军;法的概念比较分析[J];湖北广播电视大学学报;2003年03期

7 姚建宗;法哲学批判与批判的法哲学──对法哲学科学本性的一种理解[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;1998年01期

8 陈金钊;认真地对待规则——关于我国法理学研究方向的探索[J];法学研究;2000年06期

9 童之伟;再论法理学的更新[J];法学研究;1999年02期

10 埃尼尔·希曼,徐爽;当代美国自然法理论走势[J];现代法学;2002年01期



本文编号:2074282

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2074282.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户98ad0***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com