立法论证研究
发布时间：2019-03-01 16:53
【摘要】： 立法论证是确保法律合理性的重要途径。通过交互式的民主论辩和形式结构上的逻辑论证,有望使法律在实质与形式两个维度上保持自身的生命力。为此,本文在明确立法和论证的概念上,详尽论述了立法论证的形式和目的,并考察了国外立法论证的概况,指出我国立法论证在制度层面上的缺失。接下来,本文从实质与形式两个层面探究了法律的合理性,认为法律的实质合理性包括道德层面的正当性、科学意义上的合规律性以及民主视域中的平等性,形式合理性则关乎语言的明确性、条文的规范性、结构的合理性与体系的完整性四个方面。就实质合理性的立法论证而言,主要应立足于口头式的论辩,通过立法审议阶段议员或人民代表的论证与反驳来达成具有可接受性的立法结论,这种立法论辩在国外已经发展得较为完善,有着完备的论辩程序与规则,本文在借鉴的基础上,就我国如何构建立法论辩制度进行了探讨。就形式合理性的立法论证而言,主要是书面式的逻辑论证,一般在立法草案的形成过程中进行,其任务乃是消除法律文本中的逻辑错误,使文本条理清晰、结构严谨、体系连贯,在此基础上实现法律体系的逻辑自洽性。本文从逻辑要求的角度对我国的既有法律进行了审视,在指出其不合逻辑的同时,提出了改进的意见。
[Abstract]:Legislative argumentation is an important way to ensure the rationality of law. Through the interactive democratic argument and the logical argumentation in the form structure, it is expected that the law can keep its vitality in both the substance and the form dimensions. Therefore, this paper makes clear the concept of legislation and argumentation, discusses in detail the form and purpose of legislative argumentation, investigates the general situation of foreign legislative argumentation, and points out the lack of legislative argumentation in our country on the institutional level. Then, this paper probes into the rationality of law from the aspects of substance and form, and holds that the substantive rationality of law includes the legitimacy of moral level, the regularity in the scientific sense and the equality in the democratic field of view. The formal rationality is related to the clarity of the language, the standardization of the provisions, the rationality of the structure and the integrity of the system. As far as the substantive rationality of the legislative argument is concerned, we should mainly base on the oral argument and reach an acceptable legislative conclusion through the argumentation and rebuttal of members of parliament or people's representatives in the stage of legislative review. This kind of legislative argument has been developed more perfect in foreign countries, and has a complete argument procedure and rules. On the basis of reference, this paper discusses how to construct the legislative argument system in our country. As far as the legislative argumentation of formal rationality is concerned, it is mainly written logical argumentation, which is generally carried out during the formation of the draft legislation. Its task is to eliminate the logical errors in the legal text, to make the text clear and the structure rigorous. System coherence, on this basis to achieve the logical self-consistency of the legal system. This paper examines the existing laws in China from the point of view of logical requirements, points out its illogicality, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement at the same time.
【学位授予单位】：云南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D920.0
本文编号：2432620
[Abstract]:Legislative argumentation is an important way to ensure the rationality of law. Through the interactive democratic argument and the logical argumentation in the form structure, it is expected that the law can keep its vitality in both the substance and the form dimensions. Therefore, this paper makes clear the concept of legislation and argumentation, discusses in detail the form and purpose of legislative argumentation, investigates the general situation of foreign legislative argumentation, and points out the lack of legislative argumentation in our country on the institutional level. Then, this paper probes into the rationality of law from the aspects of substance and form, and holds that the substantive rationality of law includes the legitimacy of moral level, the regularity in the scientific sense and the equality in the democratic field of view. The formal rationality is related to the clarity of the language, the standardization of the provisions, the rationality of the structure and the integrity of the system. As far as the substantive rationality of the legislative argument is concerned, we should mainly base on the oral argument and reach an acceptable legislative conclusion through the argumentation and rebuttal of members of parliament or people's representatives in the stage of legislative review. This kind of legislative argument has been developed more perfect in foreign countries, and has a complete argument procedure and rules. On the basis of reference, this paper discusses how to construct the legislative argument system in our country. As far as the legislative argumentation of formal rationality is concerned, it is mainly written logical argumentation, which is generally carried out during the formation of the draft legislation. Its task is to eliminate the logical errors in the legal text, to make the text clear and the structure rigorous. System coherence, on this basis to achieve the logical self-consistency of the legal system. This paper examines the existing laws in China from the point of view of logical requirements, points out its illogicality, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement at the same time.
【学位授予单位】：云南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2009
【分类号】：D920.0
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李永成;;法律论证的逻辑——试论法律逻辑的定位[J];重庆工学院学报(社会科学版);2007年03期
2 冯袁冰;;立法技术制度化——基于法的结构及语言之视角[J];贵阳学院学报(社会科学版);2008年02期
3 孙波;;试论立法质量的科学性标准[J];内蒙古民族大学学报(社会科学版);2006年01期
4 侯学勇;;法律论证中的证明思维和论证思维[J];法制与社会发展;2006年06期
5 关保英;;科学立法科学性之解读[J];社会科学;2007年03期
6 陈芝兰;;最密切联系原则立法条文的设计与论证[J];社科纵横;2007年01期
7 汪全胜;试论立法论证[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2001年01期
8 汪全胜;立法论证探讨[J];政治与法律;2001年03期
9 朱京;非形式逻辑的兴起与发展[J];哲学动态;2003年10期
10 熊明辉;法律逻辑研究的非形式转向——第一届全国非形式逻辑与法律逻辑学术研讨会综述[J];哲学动态;2005年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 熊彬;立法质量问题研究[D];安徽大学;2003年
2 陈雪琴;我国地方立法质量问题及对策研究[D];重庆大学;2006年
，本文编号：2432620
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/fashilw/2432620.html
