我国法官错案责任追究制度研究

发布时间：2018-01-25 02:47

本文关键词： 司法正义错案错案责任追究制度比较分析　出处：《内蒙古大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：社会各类司法案件的审理,一直以来,法官都发挥着至着紧要的决策宣判作用,因此,作为司法机关的执法人员,法官能否客观、公平、公正地审理案件,维护社会的治安秩序以及诉讼人的合法权益,这将对我国法律的权威性与政策的公信力,有着同样重要的影响作用。我国目前的司法审判实践中,有一部分法官滥用职权,贪赃枉法,徇私舞弊,办理"关系案"、"人情案",违反法规法纪,枉法裁判的腐败司法现象时有发生,产生了大量的冤假错案。有鉴于此,为了维护司法公正,加强对我国法官队伍的监管,完善现有法律法规对法官责任的追究制度,我国近年制订并出台了诸多层面的法官错案责任追究制度。但就实际情况来看,当前针对错审、错判等社会案件,我国仍然没有较完善的法律追究机制,针对这些问题,现已引起了社会全民、司法界以及学术界的关注。所以,笔者试图从"错案"概念以及错案责任追究标准的内涵和外延入手,对这一制度进行全面分析,指出现行我国法官错案责任追究制度的缺点,以及当前社会条件下在我国追究法官错案责任的可行性。从惩戒制度要系统、错案概念确定、统一错案认定标准等不同的方向对法官错案责任追究制度的不足和完善进行探讨,为法官错案责任追究的制度能够顺利的实施提供参考,以便建立我国法官的错案责任追究制度体系,进而实现对我国法官的司法活动的监督,营造一个良好的司法环境,确保司法正义的尽早实现。
[Abstract]:The trial of all kinds of judicial cases in the society, judges have been playing a crucial role in decision-making and sentencing, therefore, as a judicial organ of law enforcement, judges can objective, fair, fair trial of cases. To maintain the public order and the legitimate rights and interests of litigants will have an equally important influence on the authority of our law and the credibility of our policy. Some judges abuse their power, pervert the law, practice favoritism, handle "relationship cases" and "human relations cases", violate laws and regulations, and pervert the law and adjudicate the law. In view of this, in order to maintain judicial justice, strengthen the supervision of our country's judges, improve the existing laws and regulations of the accountability of judges system. In recent years, our country has formulated and issued a number of levels of the system of investigating the responsibility of judges' miscarriage of justice. However, in the light of the actual situation, there is still no perfect mechanism of legal investigation in view of the current social cases, such as mistrial and misjudgment. In view of these problems, it has attracted the attention of the whole society, the judiciary and the academic circles. Therefore, the author tries to start with the concept of "wrong case" and the connotation and extension of the standard of investigating the responsibility of the wrong case. Through the comprehensive analysis of this system, this paper points out the shortcomings of the current system of investigating the responsibility of the judges in wrong cases, and the feasibility of investigating the responsibility of the wrong cases of judges in our country under the current social conditions. In order to provide reference for the smooth implementation of the system of investigating the responsibility of the wrong cases of judges, this paper discusses the deficiencies and perfection of the system of investigating the responsibility of the wrong cases of judges in different directions, such as defining the concept of wrong cases and unifying the standards of identification of the cases of wrong cases. In order to establish the system of investigating the responsibility of the judges in wrong cases in our country, and then to realize the supervision of the judicial activities of the judges in our country, to create a good judicial environment, and to ensure the early realization of the judicial justice.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】