当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

网络直播庭审问题研究

发布时间:2018-03-02 05:36

  本文关键词: 法庭 公开审判 媒体 网络 舆论 公共关系 出处:《复旦大学》2011年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:审判经历了长期历史演变逐渐形成了被民主社会公认的公开透明、群众可以参与监督的现代模式。而网络直播庭审模式的出现打破了传统法庭审判空间和时间的限制,将庭审现场信息的传播范围放大到近乎没有边界。本文将通过以下四个部分分析阐述网络直播庭审的利弊得失和今后的规范及发展。 第一部分内容是由当前网络直播庭审实践引出话题,通过相关数据并结合国外经验和公开审判的发展的历程,引出网络直播庭审话题即它给公开审判带来了正反两方面影响(第一章、第二章); 第二部分是从理论上分析网络自身的特征和网络直播对庭审带来的正面价值,肯定网络直播对扩大庭审监督、提高审判水准和普及法制教育的重要意义(第三章); 第三部分是结合案例探讨针对网络直播庭审的争议包括程序合法性问题、适用范围问题、舆论影响问题、对当事人名誉造成的影响等,并总结这些争议触动到的相关利益本质(第四章); 第四部分是研究如何通过立法与机构设置等手段来规范运用网络直播庭审,缓解相关正义、降低负面影响,使其价值得到最大限度的发挥(第五章)。 网络作为新兴的信息媒介,其本身的最大特性在于传播的广泛性、即时性、互动性和不易监控性。本文旨在通过对上述四部分内容的阐述找到驾驭网络直播庭审这个新事物的方法,最终期待徇私枉法情况的减少,国民法制意识趋于健全从而平息社会戾气。
[Abstract]:The trial has experienced a long historical evolution and gradually formed the modern mode of openness and transparency, which is recognized by democratic society, and the mass can participate in the supervision, while the appearance of the webcast trial mode breaks the limitation of the traditional court trial space and time. This paper will expound the advantages and disadvantages of the webcast hearing through the following four parts and explain the future standard and development. The first part of the content is from the current webcast trial practice leads to the topic, through the relevant data and combined with foreign experience and the development of public trial process, It leads to the topic of webcast trial, that is, it brings both positive and negative effects to the public trial (Chapter one, Chapter two); The second part is the theoretical analysis of the characteristics of the network itself and the positive value of the network broadcast to the trial, affirming the significance of the network broadcast in expanding the supervision of the trial, improving the trial level and popularizing the legal education (Chapter 3); The third part is to discuss the disputes about the webcast trial including the legality of the procedure, the scope of application, the influence of public opinion, the impact on the reputation of the parties and so on. And summed up the nature of the relevant interests touched by these disputes (Chapter 4th); The 4th part is to study how to standardize the use of webcast trial through legislation and institutional setting, to alleviate the relevant justice, reduce the negative impact, so that its value can be maximized (Chapter 5th). As a new information medium, the most important characteristic of the network itself lies in the universality and immediacy of communication. Interactive and not easy to monitor. This paper aims to find a way to harness the new thing of webcast trial through the elaboration of the above four parts, and finally look forward to the reduction of the situation of bending the law for favoritism. The consciousness of national legal system tends to perfect, thus quell social hostility.
【学位授予单位】:复旦大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D916.2;G206

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前3条

1 何海波;;何以合法? 对“二奶继承案”的追问[J];中外法学;2009年03期

2 张新宝,康长庆;名誉权案件审理的情况、问题及对策[J];现代法学;1997年03期

3 程味秋,周士敏;论审判公开[J];中国法学;1998年03期



本文编号:1555265

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1555265.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户cc69f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com