制度创新语境下的案例指导制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-03 13:30

本文选题：案例指导制度　切入点：指导性案例　出处：《海南大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：近年来我国的案例指导制度越来越受到重视,从最高法院到地方各级法院,从学者教授到法官律师,从理论到实践,法律工作者和部门机构都对此进行了深入的探讨研究和实践。2010年11月26日最高人民法院颁布了《关于案例指导工作的规定》,一定意义上标志着案例指导制度的初步确立。本文主要是通过对现阶段案例指导制度的一些争议话题中总结归纳了对指导性案例效力定位的各方观点,并对案例指导制度确立前对案例指导制度的定位的各种观点进行比较分析,然后得出我国的案例指导制度是制度的创新这一结论。而后对案例指导制度是制度的创新这一说法的合理性进行了论证,这是从三个层面上来进行分析说明的：第一个层面是通过案例指导制度产生的原因、运行机制和价值等本体论的角度来证明它是制度的创新；第二个层面是通过其与类似制度的比较研究得出其不同之处,从而论证案例指导制度是不同于我国古代法律传统、英美法系判例法制度、大陆法系判例制度的制度创新；第三个层面是从案例指导制度创新的目标来研究其创新之处,得出案例指导制度应该从制度的创新向创新的制度发展的结论。
[Abstract]:In recent years, more and more attention has been paid to the case guidance system in China, from the Supreme Court to the local courts, from scholars and professors to judges and lawyers, from theory to practice. In November 26th 2010, the Supreme people's Court promulgated the provisions on case guidance, which in a certain sense marked the initial establishment of the case guidance system. This paper summarizes and summarizes the views of all parties on the orientation of the effectiveness of instructive cases by summarizing some controversial topics in the current case guidance system. And to the case guidance system before the establishment of the positioning of the case guidance system, Then we draw the conclusion that the case guidance system of our country is the innovation of the system, and then demonstrate the rationality of the argument that the case guidance system is the innovation of the system. This is analyzed from three levels: the first level is to prove that the system is the innovation of the system from the perspective of ontology, such as the cause of the case guidance system, the operating mechanism and the value; The second level is through its comparative study with the similar system to draw its differences, so as to demonstrate that the case guidance system is different from our ancient legal tradition, Anglo-American legal system case law system, civil law system system system innovation; The third level is to study its innovation from the goal of case guidance system innovation, and draw the conclusion that case guidance system should develop from system innovation to innovation system.
【学位授予单位】：海南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】