当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

论新闻舆论监督与刑事审判的关系

发布时间:2018-03-03 21:55

  本文选题:新闻舆论监督 切入点:刑事审判 出处:《华侨大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:从“依法制国”到“依法治国”方略的改变,人们的法治观念和意识也逐渐增强,对国家公共事务的参与和管理的权利要求也越来越强烈。司法审判权属于国家公共权利的一种,是社会监督的一个方面。随着大众传媒的迅速蔓延,媒体报道涉及到社会生活的各个方面,媒体报道对刑事案件,尤其是重大刑事案件,越来越关注。虽然,他们相信刑事审判是维护当事人合法权利和实现社会正义的一个重要渠道,但是,刑事审判的意外变异更会使公正销声匿迹、不复存在。广大民众非常希望表达自己的意见和建议对司法审判的运行状况直接实现影响和督促,实现在他们心目中所谓的公平正义的价值。 因很多的因素而呈现对立统一的关系:一方面,新闻舆论的监督直接拷问着刑事审判的良知,两者追求的价值目标是一致的,都是为了公平正义等价值的实现,新闻舆论在一定程度上对刑事审判产生了积极的影响,另一方面,由于新闻舆论监督有自身的特征、本质、运行方式和法律限制的缺失,导致了实践中新闻舆论监督对刑事审判产生消极的影响,影响了法院的中立和公正。因此,分析两者产生冲突的原因,构建完善、合理的制度实现两者的和谐至关重要。本文分为六个部分。 第一部分,,介绍新闻舆论监督的基本内容。熟知新闻舆论监督涵义、特征、功能、法理基础等内容,为下文重点剖析新闻舆论监督与刑事审判的关系的做铺垫和条件,是很有必要的。 第二部分,介绍了新闻舆论监督与相关的刑事审判的基本原则。例如,审审判公开、司法独立、无罪推定原则等基本原则。 第三部分,介绍新闻舆论监督与刑事审判的关系。新闻舆论监督对刑事审判作用是两方面的,即积极影响和消极影响同时存在。 第四部分,介绍了域外的立法与实践。熟知国际人权文件的相关规定,重点阐述了英美法系和大陆法系的通行做法和经验。他山之石,可以攻玉,借鉴外国成功经验的范例,可以为我国立法做重要参考。 第五部分,提出目前我国新闻舆论监督与刑事审判之间存在的立法、实践中的问题,对于解决问题提出了建议,通过完善立法、构建相关制度体系,缓解新闻舆论监督与刑事审判的紧张冲突,实现二者的协调发展。 第六部分,我国新闻舆论监督与刑事审判的关系的法理学思考。
[Abstract]:With the change of the strategy from "governing the country according to law" to "running the country according to law", people's concept and consciousness of rule of law have been gradually strengthened. The right to participate in and manage national public affairs is also increasingly strong. Judicial jurisdiction is one of the public rights of the state and an aspect of social supervision. With the rapid spread of mass media, Media coverage involves all aspects of social life. Media reports are increasingly concerned with criminal cases, especially major criminal cases. Although, They believe that criminal justice is an important channel for safeguarding the legitimate rights of the parties and for achieving social justice, but the accidental variation of criminal justice will make justice disappear, The general public is eager to express their opinions and suggestions to directly influence and urge the operation of the judicial trial and to realize the so-called value of fairness and justice in their eyes. On the one hand, the supervision of public opinion directly grilled the conscience of the criminal trial, and the value goals pursued by the two were the same, both for the realization of the value of fairness and justice. To a certain extent, the news public opinion has a positive influence on the criminal trial. On the other hand, because of the lack of its own characteristics, nature, operation mode and legal restrictions, the supervision of the news public opinion has its own characteristics. This has led to the negative influence of news and public opinion supervision on the criminal trial in practice, which has affected the neutrality and impartiality of the court. It is very important to realize the harmony between the two by a reasonable system. This paper is divided into six parts. The first part introduces the basic contents of news public opinion supervision. It is familiar with the meaning, characteristics, functions, legal basis and other contents of news public opinion supervision, so as to lay the groundwork and conditions for the following analysis of the relationship between news public opinion supervision and criminal trial. It is necessary. The second part introduces the basic principles of public opinion supervision and related criminal trial, such as trial openness, judicial independence, presumption of innocence and so on. The third part introduces the relationship between public opinion supervision and criminal trial. Part 4th, introduces the legislation and practice of foreign countries, familiar with the relevant provisions of international human rights documents, and focuses on the common practices and experiences of Anglo-American and continental law systems. Can make important reference for our country legislation. In the 5th part, the author puts forward the existing legislation and problems in practice between the supervision of news public opinion and the criminal trial in our country, and puts forward some suggestions to solve the problems, through perfecting the legislation, constructing the relevant system system, To ease the tense conflict between the supervision of public opinion and the criminal trial, and to realize the coordinated development of the two. Part 6th, the relationship between the supervision of public opinion and the criminal trial in China.
【学位授予单位】:华侨大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D925.2;D926.2;G206

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前7条

1 龙宗智,李常青;论司法独立与司法受制[J];法学;1998年12期

2 顾培东;论对司法的传媒监督[J];法学研究;1999年06期

3 徐迅;中国媒体与司法关系现状评析[J];法学研究;2001年06期

4 贺卫方;传媒与司法三题[J];法学研究;1998年06期

5 李修源;关于舆论监督与司法独立的两个话题[J];人民司法;2000年08期

6 张西明;度与量的平衡——西方司法审判与新闻报道关系略析[J];人民司法;1999年07期

7 刘敏;论裁判请求权——民事诉讼的宪法理念[J];中国法学;2002年06期



本文编号:1562832

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1562832.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户be59c***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com