中国情势下能动司法之研究

发布时间：2018-04-03 16:00

本文选题：能动司法　切入点：司法能动主义　出处：《华侨大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：能动司法是人民法院服务经济社会发展大局的必然选择。近年来，能动司法也成为我国法律理论和实务界的热门话题。但是，何谓能动司法？当代中国的能动司法与西方国家的能动司法有何区别？今天我们提出能动司法的意义何在？如何构建我国能动司法的实践机制？对这些问题，，由于相关的理论研究尚未深入，司法实践尚不充分，因而亟待进一步深入研究和总结。正是在这一时代背景下，笔者选择中国情势下的能动司法作为研究对象，以期通过对能动司法问题进行更加深入的理论研究和实践探索，探寻出一条适合当代中国的司法改革之路。论文从能动司法的基本范畴入手，追本溯源，在中外比较的基础上，寻求当代中国能动司法的成因。本文在深刻把握当代中国能动司法的现实背景的前提下，进而探究能动司法在我国的真正意蕴，以求对其性质和特征、功能作出更清晰的理解和解释。在此基础上，笔者较为详尽地阐述了能动司法的历史演变、基本原则等问题，最后，对当代中国能动司法实践进行了概括和总结，将能动司法思想贯彻到实践之中。文章立足于回应型司法的思想，认为司法从以规则为中心变成以解决纠纷为中心。基于此，全文贯穿了一个基本指导思想——司法活动应当以满足现实社会民众的司法需求为最高价值，要求法院和法官对政治形势能够敏锐地观察，对社会矛盾能够准确地分析，对社会矛盾纠纷能够案结事了。综观全文，从理论方面来看，有人担心能动司法与司法克制、司法被动性等司法规律产生冲突，这种观点归根结底是出于对能动司法性质的误解。笔者对当代中国的能动司法与西方尤其是美国的司法能动主义的内涵，进行了深入细致的剖析比较，作出了理性而全面的回答。笔者认为，当代中国能动司法的本质不在于诉讼程序上主动或被动，而是在于发挥中国司法的服务功能，通过有效化解进入司法的各种社会矛盾，为经济社会的发展提供有力的司法保障。从实践方面来看，笔者从能动司法的边界、参与主体、工作方法、工作场所等方面进行了一定的归纳或探索，不仅充分印证了能动司法在我国的可行性和必要性，也为进一步加强当代中国能动司法的理论研究和实践创新奠定了一定基础。
[Abstract]:Active justice is the inevitable choice for the people's court to serve the overall situation of economic and social development.In recent years, active justice has also become a hot topic in the field of legal theory and practice.But what does it mean to be active in justice?What is the difference between active judicature in contemporary China and that in western countries?What is the significance of today's proposal to move the administration of justice?How to construct the practical mechanism of active judicature in our country?These problems need to be further studied and summarized because the relevant theoretical research is not deep and judicial practice is not enough.It is against this background that the author chooses the active justice in China as the object of study, in order to carry out more in-depth theoretical research and practical exploration on the issue of active justice.To explore a suitable for contemporary China's judicial reform road.This paper starts with the basic category of active judicature, tracing back to its source and seeking the causes of active judicature in contemporary China on the basis of comparison between China and foreign countries.On the premise of deeply grasping the realistic background of active judicature in contemporary China, this paper probes into the real meaning of active judicature in our country, in order to make a clearer understanding and explanation of its nature, characteristics and functions.On this basis, the author elaborates the historical evolution and basic principles of active judicature in detail. Finally, the author generalizes and summarizes the practice of active judicature in contemporary China, and puts the thought of active judicature into practice.Based on the thought of responsive judicature, the author thinks that justice has changed from rule-centered to dispute-solving.Based on this, the full text runs through a basic guiding idea-judicial activities should be to meet the judicial needs of real society as the highest value, requiring courts and judges to be able to observe the political situation acutely.Social contradictions can be accurately analyzed, social contradictions and disputes can be concluded.From the theoretical point of view, some people worry that there are conflicts between active judicature and judicial restraint, judicial passivity and other judicial laws. This view is based on the misunderstanding of the nature of active judicature in the final analysis.The author makes a thorough and detailed analysis and comparison of the connotation of the active judicature in contemporary China and the western countries, especially in the United States, and makes a rational and comprehensive answer.The author believes that the essence of active judicature in contemporary China lies not in the active or passive litigation procedure, but in giving full play to the service function of the Chinese judiciary and effectively resolving the various social contradictions that enter the justice system.To provide strong judicial protection for economic and social development.From the practical point of view, the author summarized or explored the boundary of active justice, the main body of participation, the working methods, the workplace and so on, which not only fully confirmed the feasibility and necessity of active justice in our country.It also lays a foundation for further strengthening the theoretical research and practical innovation of active justice in contemporary China.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】