社会舆论的司法意蕴分析

发布时间：2018-05-10 23:29

本文选题：社会舆论 + 司法独立　；参考：《吉林大学》2012年博士论文

【摘要】：在当代中国司法案件中，社会舆论呈现出多元化的舆论格局，形成了以传统媒体、网络公众和学者为主要极点构成的三极模式，社会舆论与当代中国司法关系的模型呈现出一个金字塔的样态。社会舆论在司法过程中具有良性作用。在司法腐败严重、独立司法还未实现的情况下，两者间是正和博弈关系；社会舆论促进了公民公共精神的觉醒；为私权力对抗公权力提供了空间；具有社会安全阀作用，其与司法所具有的安全阀功能形成互补。社会舆论对于司法也存在潜在危险。社会舆论的非理性因素同司法的理性要求间存在背离。社会舆论可能损害独立司法和程序正义，并出现网络民粹主义倾向。社会舆论之于司法的潜在危险的理论反思，对正确审视、利用和引导社会舆论和认识社会舆论与司法之间的关系尤为重要。只要理性引导，社会舆论不但不会危及司法权威的树立，反而能够对其产生一定促进作用。具体而言，，通过社会舆论建立司法权威，主要有以下几种路径。第一，通过社会舆论促进司法改革。第二，通过社会舆论树立法律权威。第三，通过社会舆论培养法律信仰。第四，通过社会舆论实现司法公正。
[Abstract]:In contemporary Chinese judicial cases, public opinion presents a pluralistic pattern of public opinion, forming a three-pole pattern composed of traditional media, network public and scholars. The model of the relationship between public opinion and contemporary Chinese judicature presents a pyramid. Public opinion plays a positive role in the judicial process. Under the condition that judicial corruption is serious and independent judicature has not been realized, there is a positive and game relationship between the two; public opinion promotes the awakening of citizen's public spirit; it provides space for private power to confront public power; it has the function of social safety valve. It is complementary to the function of safety valve. The public opinion also has the potential danger to the judicature. The irrational factors of public opinion deviate from the rational demands of judicature. Public opinion may undermine independent justice and procedural justice, and there is a tendency to cyberpopulism. The theoretical reflection of public opinion on the potential danger of judicature is particularly important to correctly examine, utilize and guide public opinion and to understand the relationship between public opinion and judicature. As long as rational guidance, public opinion will not endanger the establishment of judicial authority, but can promote it. Specifically, the establishment of judicial authority through public opinion, there are mainly the following ways. First, promote judicial reform through public opinion. Second, establish legal authority through public opinion. Third, cultivate legal belief through public opinion. Fourth, the realization of judicial justice through public opinion.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】