辩护律师刑事豁免权研究
本文选题:辩护律师 + 刑事豁免 ; 参考:《广西师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:近年来,法学界及律师界对律师辩护豁免权问题进行了多方面多角度的讨论和研究,但在司法实践中仍然存在对律师辩护豁免权问题认识不统一,缺乏可操作标准,以及立法层面缺失等问题,从而导致律师诉讼权利始终无法得以有效保障,律师因执业行为被追诉被迫害的案例也层出不穷,严重影响律师辩护工作的正常开展。如广西北海多名律师被拘案、李庄伪证案等涉及律师履行辩护职责而被追责的案件频频发生,且争议、影响极大,律师界人人自危,所有律师无不谈伪证色变,严重挫伤律师参与刑事辩护的积极性,严重影响律师刑事辩护制度应有的作用。如何从立法层面,司法层面以及外部环境层面对律师豁免权进行构建和完善,真正保障刑事辩护律师在刑事诉讼活动中的合法权利就成了当务之急!故此,希望通过对现实问题的调查分析,结合国外先进国家和地区的制度设计理念,探明建立完善的律师辩护豁免制度的实质意义和方法,为我国立法者和司法者提供一点理论参考,以期实现中国律师刑事辩护制度的不断进步和完善。本文总共分为五个部分。首先从理论方面进行探讨,对律师刑事辩护豁免权进行一个整体概述,包括概念、特征、内容等分析。第二部分可以对律师刑事辩护豁免权的理论基础和价值取向进行分析说明,点明此制度在我国的发展意义和目的。这两个部分,对律师刑事辩护豁免权进行一个全面的阐述,使读者能够对律师刑事辩护豁免权产生认识的基础,对构建中国特色的律师刑事辩护豁免权有一个初始概念。论文的第三部分采用从外到内的逻辑顺序,首先概述英美法系国家,比如英国、美国等,律师刑事辩护豁免权的基本状况,而后再概述大陆法系国家,例如法国,卢森堡的律师刑事辩护豁免权的情况,进而对此进行评析做出小结,总结出律师刑事辩护豁免权之所以能在英美法系、大陆法系国家能够成功运用的原因或分析某些国家为何不采用律师刑事辩护豁免权或其在实行律师刑事辩护豁免权时所遇到的阻碍,为分析我国是否能实行或是否应实行律师刑事辩护豁免权奠定理论基础。论文第四、五部分是论文的重点内容,第四部分是对中国律师刑事辩护豁免权的现状及存在的缺失方面的分析,其中,现状分别从我国实行律师刑事辩护豁免权的法律规定和司法实践两方面阐述;结合案例分析,分析在实践中律师刑事辩护豁免权存在问题的原因。第五部分是我国刑事辩护豁免权的构建和完善。结合新颁布的《刑事诉讼法》中的辩护制度的有关内容,以及《律师法》的相关条例,从立法,司法及外部环境方面,通过主体、范围的确定,相关法条的完善,惩戒机制的建立,和律师自律性的提高等内容的设计,构建出一个适合我国体制以及政策的律师刑事辩护豁免权。
[Abstract]:In recent years, legal circles and lawyers have discussed and studied the defense immunity of lawyers from many angles, but in judicial practice, there is still a lack of unified understanding of the defense immunity of lawyers and lack of operational standards. As well as the lack of legislation, resulting in lawyers' litigation rights can not be effectively protected, lawyers are prosecuted for their practice and persecuted cases also emerge one after another, seriously affecting the normal development of lawyers' defense work. For example, many lawyers in Beihai in Guangxi have been detained, Li Zhuang perjury cases and other cases involving lawyers being pursued and held responsible for their defense duties have occurred frequently, and disputes have had a great impact on them. The lawyers' circles are in great danger, and all lawyers do not talk about perjury. Seriously dampening the enthusiasm of lawyers to participate in criminal defense, seriously affect the role of lawyers' criminal defense system. How to construct and perfect the lawyer's immunity from the aspects of legislation, judicature and external environment, so as to ensure the legal rights of criminal defense lawyer in criminal proceedings becomes a top priority. Therefore, it is hoped that through the investigation and analysis of practical problems and the concept of system design in advanced countries and regions abroad, the essential significance and method of establishing a perfect defense exemption system for lawyers will be proved. To provide some theoretical reference for the legislator and the judiciary in China, in order to realize the continuous progress and perfection of the criminal defense system of China's lawyers. This paper is divided into five parts. First of all, from the theoretical aspects of the discussion, a comprehensive overview of lawyers' immunity from criminal defense, including the concept, characteristics, content and so on. The second part can analyze the theoretical basis and value orientation of lawyers' immunity from criminal defense, and point out the significance and purpose of this system in our country. These two parts make a comprehensive exposition on the immunity of lawyer's criminal defense, so that the reader can have the basis of understanding the immunity of lawyer's criminal defense, and have an initial concept to construct the immunity of lawyer's criminal defense with Chinese characteristics. The third part of the thesis uses the logic order from the outside to the inside, first outlines the basic situation of the common law countries, such as the United Kingdom, the United States, and lawyers' immunity from criminal defense, and then summarizes the civil law countries, such as France. Luxembourg's immunity from criminal defense of lawyers, and then comment and make a summary of this, summed up that lawyers' immunity from criminal defense can be in the common law system, The reasons why States of the civil law system have been able to apply it successfully or to analyse why some States do not use the immunity of counsel for criminal defence or the obstacles they encounter in the exercise of the immunity of lawyers for criminal defence, It lays a theoretical foundation for analyzing whether the immunity of criminal defense of lawyers can be or should be implemented in our country. The fourth and fifth parts of the thesis are the key contents of the thesis, the fourth part is the analysis of the current situation and the deficiency of the immunity of Chinese lawyers' criminal defense, among which, The present situation is elaborated from the legal provisions and judicial practice of the immunity of criminal defense of lawyers in our country, and the reasons for the problems in the immunity of criminal defense of lawyers in practice are analyzed in combination with the analysis of cases. The fifth part is the construction and perfection of the immunity of criminal defense in our country. Combining the relevant contents of the defense system in the newly promulgated "Criminal procedure Law" and the relevant regulations of the "lawyers Law", from the aspects of legislation, judicature and external environment, through the determination of the subject, the scope, and the perfection of the relevant articles of the law, With the establishment of disciplinary mechanism and the improvement of lawyers' self-discipline, the author constructs a lawyer's immunity from criminal defense, which is suitable for the system and policy of our country.
【学位授予单位】:广西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘新民;;律师刑事辩护之我见[J];法制与社会;2007年11期
2 ;加强和改进律师刑事辩护工作[J];中国司法;2008年03期
3 吕途;中国律师刑事辩护的现状及对策[J];理论观察;2003年01期
4 苗绘,吕途;完善我国律师刑事辩护制度的若干思考[J];理论观察;2003年05期
5 张述元;完善我国律师刑事辩护权的思考[J];国家检察官学院学报;2003年02期
6 梁恒祥;律师刑事辩护制度完善之构想[J];钦州师范高等专科学校学报;2004年02期
7 吴家林;当前律师刑事辩护困境的原因及对策[J];宁德师专学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年01期
8 赵大程;;在构建社会主义和谐社会中做好律师刑事辩护工作[J];中国司法;2008年03期
9 郑明景;蒋志迪;;论我国律师刑事辩护权的立法不足及完善[J];科技信息(科学教研);2008年10期
10 张俊果;;律师刑事辩护困境分析[J];山西师大学报(社会科学版);2009年S1期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 刘碧田;杨铭;;董必武与我国的律师刑事辩护制度[A];董必武法学思想研究文集(第九辑)[C];2009年
2 郑国;;从董必武法律思想看我国律师刑事辩护制度的完善——关于同一律师事务所律师为同案不同被告人辩护问题的探讨[A];董必武法学思想研究文集(第十二辑)[C];2012年
相关重要报纸文章 前8条
1 通讯员 况汉平 杨富志;我市律师刑事辩护案件辩护词在省获奖[N];安康日报;2008年
2 西北大学法学院 于欣华 王涛;律师刑事辩护权浅议[N];法制日报;2012年
3 台建林;中国律师刑事辩护培训中心成立[N];法制日报;2007年
4 叶 欣;律师刑事辩护豁免制度[N];人民法院报;2004年
5 记者 赵阳;认真贯彻落实修改后的刑事诉讼法 依法规范诚信履行律师刑事辩护职责[N];法制日报;2012年
6 李凯;当前律师刑事辩护工作的主要障碍[N];中国社会科学院院报;2008年
7 本报记者 许梅;审委会制度改革不等于取消审委会 律师刑事辩护对防冤错案意义重大[N];浙江法制报;2014年
8 本报记者 周斌;减少和避免阻碍律师刑辩履职行为[N];法制日报;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘英;论我国律师刑事辩护豁免权[D];内蒙古大学;2015年
2 李龙;检察环节律师刑事辩护权保障研究[D];山东财经大学;2016年
3 骆阳红;辩护律师刑事豁免权研究[D];广西师范大学;2017年
4 柳萌;我国律师刑事辩护权利探讨[D];湘潭大学;2009年
5 李硕;论我国律师刑事辩护“三难”问题[D];吉林大学;2010年
6 刘杨;论我国律师刑事辩护权的完善[D];中国政法大学;2011年
7 石卫东;论律师刑事辩护豁免权[D];苏州大学;2005年
8 金荣;中国律师刑事辩护制度与联合国刑事司法准则[D];苏州大学;2003年
9 王礼贵;律师刑事辩护责任豁免权研究[D];安徽大学;2007年
10 申恒梅;关于我国律师刑事辩护豁免权制度的研究[D];中国政法大学;2011年
,本文编号:1927646
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1927646.html