司法裁判中的法理与民意

发布时间：2018-06-04 07:18

本文选题：司法裁判 + 法理　；参考：《法商研究》2012年05期

【摘要】：当前,我国有的法院为使其司法裁判回应民意,在司法过程中出现了直接以政治化手段解决本应由司法手段解决的纠纷、不依据法理寻找和适用裁判规范、不依据法理阐明裁判理由等不讲法律和法理的问题。法理是确保司法裁判在法治框架内回应民意所不可或缺的手段。这一方面与依行政意志和常理回应民意具有局限性有关,另一方面也与价值判断和词语技术方法密不可分。法官依据法理通过疏导、说服和鉴别、吸纳民意,以及通过寻找、解释或创制方法形成体现民意的裁判规范等方式,能使刚性的法律得以柔化,使司法真正发挥社会调节器的作用。然而,法理自身又具有专业性、主观性和争议性等有限性,对此我们应当通过修辞方法予以弥补。
[Abstract]:At present, in order to make the judicial judgment respond to the public opinion, some courts in our country have solved the disputes which should be resolved by the judicial means directly by the politicized means in the judicial process, and do not seek and apply the adjudication norm according to the legal principle. Not according to the principles of law to clarify the reasons of the referee and other issues without regard to the law and legal theory. Jurisprudence is an indispensable means of ensuring that the administration of justice responds to public opinion within the framework of the rule of law. On the one hand, it is related to the limitation of responding to public opinion according to administrative will and common sense, on the other hand, it is closely related to value judgment and technical methods of words and expressions. Judges can soften rigid laws by persuading, persuading and discriminating, absorbing public opinion, and by seeking, explaining or creating methods to form adjudicative norms that reflect public opinion. To make the judiciary really play the role of social regulator. However, the legal theory itself is professional, subjective and controversial, so we should make up for it by rhetorical methods.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;浙江工业大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】