当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

检察机关参与恢复性司法研究

发布时间:2018-07-27 19:07
【摘要】:恢复性司法作为一种减少对抗,化解社会矛盾,提倡让犯罪人重新回归社会,并修复破损的社会关系的司法模式,在外国的司法实践中显示出强大的生命力,因此也逐渐进入到我国各地检察机关的视野。恢复性司法的基本价值在于是一种新的利益争端解决机制。在现在的刑事案件中,检察机关代表着国家行使着批捕权、起诉权、监督权等一系列权利,以犯罪嫌疑人、被告人为针对对象,其处理态度具有一定的惩罚性。即使在检察机关在办理某些案件中不予逮捕、不予起诉,其也是考虑着犯罪事实大小、主观恶性轻重,并未深刻的分析人文效果及社会效果,这就意味着检察机关的行为不是在解决矛盾,而仅仅是为了保障法律的实施。要真正解决因出现犯罪行为而产生社会关系失衡,恢复性司法为检察机关的参与提供了一个重要的契机,明晰检察机关如何定位自己的角色,检察机关参与恢复性司法的价值,检察机关参与恢复性司法最终目标,是最终将检察机关参与到恢复性司法中的基础。 我国检察机关对于恢复性司法也在不断的进行着探索与尝试。但是在探索的过程中,仍旧很难摆脱现行司法理念和制度的束缚,,将参与恢复性司法的方式流于形式,失去了引进、创新与结合的思维。而恢复性司法是兼具原则性与灵活性的司法模式,检察机关参与恢复性司法时如果失去了这些特性的话,显然囿于这种模式的引进。 本文旨在对恢复性司法制度的研究,首先明确基本的参与基础,然后结合对国内检察机关参与恢复性司法的现状,着眼于我国检察机关参与恢复性司法出现的问题与障碍,并结合笔者的社会实践,对检察机关如何更好的参与恢复性司法,提出对策性建议并展开论述。本文共分为三部分进行探讨: 一、检察机关参与恢复性司法的法理基础。此章主要阐述恢复性司法的基本概念、特征及作用,将恢复性司法的基本内涵阐释出来;同时为更好的理解检察机关参与恢复性司法的可行性,还将检察机关的职能与任务做出必要的解释;并逐步引入检察机关参与恢复性司法的现状、定位及意义,指出为了构建和谐社会、适应情况形势政策需要,检察机关参与恢复性司法正是提供了一个重要的契机;明晰检察机关如何定位自己的角色、检察机关参与恢复性司法的价值、检察机关参与恢复性司法最终目标。综上,阐述了检察机关参与恢复性司法的理论基础,通过了解这些理论基础,为使检察机关参与恢复性司法做出重要的铺垫。 二、检察机关参与恢复性司法的障碍。该部分重点介绍了我国检察机关在尝试恢复性司法的过程中,由于传统思维与国家本位主义价值观导致了参与过程中的理念滞后这个难题,并重点分析了检察机关参与恢复性司法的法律保障不到位、制度不健全、与各部门配合不协调等问题,剖析了如果不能解决这些问题,恢复性司法将在检察机关参与恢复性司法的过程中举步维艰。了解检察机关参与恢复性司法中已经出现的以及将要出现的适用困境,通过提出具有适时性和前瞻性的问题,把握检察机关参与恢复性司法的脉络,为检察机关的参与行为做好指引。 三、检察机关参与恢复性司法的完善建议。此章提出了对检察机关参与恢复性司法的几点建议,其中首先是对理念的方向定位,要将传统的观念与当今司法理念结合,重点是要是和现在的社会形势结合;其次是确立检察机关参与的法律保障,要在统一的法律秩序下,确保检察机关参与的实现;最后通过横向和纵向、内部和外部几种模式相结合的方式,整合检察机关参与恢复性司法的部门、秩序、外部环境,全方位、多角度的对各个层次和环节提出具体完善建议,从而保证检察机关顺利参与到恢复性司法中去。通过一些合理化建议,旨在使检察机关参与恢复性司法程序更加具有全面性,尽可能减少参与过程中出现的瑕疵与问题,使检察机关的整个参与过程更具合理性。
[Abstract]:Restorative justice, as a way of reducing confrontation, resolving social contradictions, promoting the reintegration of criminals to society and restoring the damaged social relations, shows a strong vitality in foreign judicial practice, and has gradually entered the field of vision of the procuratorial organs of all parts of China. The basic value of restorative justice lies in the fact that it is one of the basic values of the judiciary. In the present criminal case, the procuratorial organ represents the state exercising a series of rights, such as the right of arrest, the right to prosecute, the right of supervision, and so on. The criminal suspect and the accused are targeted to the object, and the attitude of the prosecution is punitive. Even if the inspection agency does not arrest in certain cases, it will not be arrested. This means that the behavior of the procuratorial organs is not a solution to the contradiction, but only to guarantee the implementation of the law. It is necessary to truly solve the imbalance of social relations and the restorative justice as a procuratorial machine. The participation of Guan Guan provides an important opportunity to clarify how the procuratorial organs locate their roles, the procuratorial organ participates in the value of restorative justice, and the procuratorial organ participates in the ultimate goal of restorative justice, which is the basis for the final participation of the procuratorial organs in restorative justice.
The procuratorial organs of our country continue to explore and try the restorative justice. However, in the process of exploration, it is still difficult to get rid of the constraints of the existing judicial ideas and systems, and to take part in the form of restorative justice and lose the thought of the introduction, innovation and integration. If the procuratorial organ participates in restorative justice, if it loses these characteristics, it is obviously limited by the introduction of this mode.
The purpose of this paper is to make a study of the restorative justice system, first of all, to clarify the basic participation basis, and then to combine the status of the domestic procuratorial organs to participate in the restorative justice, and to focus on the problems and obstacles of the participation of the procuratorial organs in the restorative judicature in our country, and in combination with the author's social practice, how to better participate in the restorative justice of the procuratorial organs. This paper is divided into three parts:
First, the procuratorial organ participates in the legal basis of restorative justice. This chapter mainly expounds the basic concepts, characteristics and functions of restorative justice, interprets the basic connotation of restorative justice; at the same time, to better understand the feasibility of the procuratorial organs to participate in the restorative justice, and make the necessary explanation for the functions and tasks of the inspection organs; Gradually introducing the status, position and significance of procuratorial organs participating in restorative justice, points out that in order to build a harmonious society and adapt to the needs of the situation and situation policy, the procuratorial organs have provided an important opportunity to participate in the restorative justice, and the procuratorial organs are clear how to locate their own horns, and the procuratorial organs participate in the value of restorative justice. The inspection organ participates in the ultimate goal of restorative justice. In summary, the theoretical basis of the procuratorial organ's participation in restorative justice is expounded. Through understanding these theoretical foundations, it is important to make an important paving for procuratorial organs to participate in restorative justice.
Two, the procuratorial organ participates in the obstacle of the restorative justice. This part mainly introduces the problem that the traditional thinking and national standard values lead to the lag of concept in the process of participation in the process of trying to restore sexual justice, and emphatically analyzes the legal guarantee of the inspection authorities participating in the restorative justice. If the system is not perfect and the coordination of the various departments is not coordinated, it is analyzed that if the problems can not be solved, the restorative justice will be difficult in the process of the procuratorial organs participating in the restorative justice. Looking ahead, we should grasp the thread of procuratorial organs' participation in restorative justice and guide the procuratorial organs' participation.
Three, the procuratorial organs are involved in the improvement of restorative justice. This chapter puts forward some suggestions for the procuratorial organs to participate in restorative justice. First, the orientation of the concept is the orientation of the concept. It is necessary to combine the traditional concept with the current judicial idea, with the emphasis on the combination of the present social situation, and the second is to establish the law of the procuratorial organs. Under the unified legal order, we should ensure the realization of the participation of the procuratorial organs; finally, through the combination of horizontal and vertical, internal and external modes, we should integrate the procuratorial organs to participate in the restorative justice departments, order, the external environment, and provide concrete and comprehensive suggestions on various levels and links. The procuratorial organ is successfully involved in the restorative justice. Through some rationalization proposals, it aims to make the procuratorial organs participate in the restorative judicial procedure more comprehensive, reduce the defects and problems in the process of participation as much as possible, and make the whole process of participation of the procuratorial organs more reasonable.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926.3;D925.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 单勇;周彬彬;;被害人权利保护与恢复性司法[J];当代法学;2008年05期

2 樊崇义;王文生;;关于刑事和解的若干问题探讨[J];中国司法;2009年01期

3 刘晓虎;;恢复性司法在我国的借鉴及推广论证[J];东方法学;2008年05期

4 唐芳;;恢复性司法的困境及其超越[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2006年04期

5 刘仁文;;恢复性司法与和谐社会[J];福建公安高等专科学校学报;2007年01期

6 陈孜;关于犯罪标签理论的评析[J];法学杂志;2004年05期

7 屈耀伦;;预防与报应:刑罚目的的二元构建[J];法学评论;2006年01期

8 吴宗宪;恢复性司法述评[J];江苏公安专科学校学报;2002年03期

9 张平;;“恢复性”的背后——恢复性司法的法理学批判[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2008年02期

10 宁松,王志华;现代司法理念与司法公正的本土化整合[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2005年02期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 黄文艺 吉林大学理论法学研究中心;[N];中国社会科学报;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 杨登;恢复性司法视角下我国监狱刑罚执行的改革[D];湘潭大学;2006年



本文编号:2148859

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2148859.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户03b67***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com