论反贪侦查中的犯罪嫌疑人人权保障
[Abstract]:The realization of human rights is affected by various factors, among which the greatest threat comes from the exercise of the public power of the state, and the effective prevention of the abuse of the public power of the state becomes an important link in the protection of human rights. From the angle of investigating crimes of corruption and bribery, the crimes committed by state functionaries by taking advantage of their duties are typical forms of abuse of state power. The exercise of investigation power by procuratorial organs reflects the legal supervision of state power. In order to ensure the normal exercise of state power, however, due to the fact that our country has been under heavy attack for a long time and neglected the influence of the legal concept and criminal policy of protection, we have not paid enough attention to the protection of the rights and interests of criminal suspects. The legal provisions on the protection of the rights and interests of criminal suspects lag behind the level of the development of the rule of law in the world today. The fact that the procuratorial organs infringe on the rights and interests of criminal suspects is not prohibited. It happens from time to time, extorting confessions by torture, and detaining them for extended periods of time. The imperfection of the right of legal aid and the abuse of coercive measures have brought great challenges to the protection of the rights and interests of criminal suspects in our country. The protection of criminal suspects' human rights is an important standard to measure the civilization and progress of a country's criminal procedure legal system. The value of criminal proceedings is the punishment of crime and the protection of human rights. How to coordinate the relationship between punishing job-related crimes and safeguarding the human rights of criminal suspects, so as to ensure the smooth implementation of procuratorial investigation rights and protect the legitimate rights and interests of criminal suspects is democracy. The construction of the rule of law and the cause of human rights protection are facing common practical problems. The revised Criminal procedure Law establishes the principle of "the state respects and protects human rights." People-oriented, respecting and protecting human rights has become the main theme of the times and society, has become the value of the law, and has become the whole legislation. The operation foundation of judicature, law enforcement and law-abiding. The author thinks that respecting and protecting human rights is the duty of the legal person and the sacred mission of the prosecutor. In contemporary China, we should base ourselves on the legal idea and spirit of law supremacy, right standard, fairness and justice, balance of interests, people-oriented, rule of law as the foundation, human rights guarantee as the core, control and restriction. To supervise the exercise of procuratorial organs and their powers, to prevent the abuse, misuse and arbitrariness of anti-corruption investigation power, and to protect the human rights of criminal suspects to the maximum extent. In reality, in order to exercise the right of anti-corruption investigation, we should establish the concept of rule of law, strengthen the concept of due process, change the concept of litigation, strengthen the consciousness of rights and human rights protection, and take these scientific and humanized ideas as the guidance. The protection of the human rights of criminal suspects is truly realized. From the perspective of anti-corruption investigation, this paper systematically discusses the inherent relationship between human rights protection of criminal suspects and procuratorial investigation right. The first chapter summarizes the concept and characteristics of anti-corruption investigation as well as the legal basis and the scope of human rights protection of suspects. The second chapter gives an example of the current situation of human rights protection of criminal suspects and the existing problems in combination with the analysis of the current judicial practice in our country. Combining with the revised Criminal procedure Law, this paper makes a rational thinking on the perfection of the human rights protection of criminal suspects in anti-corruption investigation under the existing criminal procedure mode. In the third chapter, combining with my own work experience, the author puts forward some ideas on the perfection of investigation concept, extended detention, internal supervision of procuratorial organs, the whole process synchronous audio and video recording system and the people's supervisor system in the current anti-corruption investigation.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D925.2;D926.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 轩翠;;对反贪侦查阶段翻供现象的法律思考[J];法制与经济(中旬刊);2011年03期
2 徐国良,陆锡平,徐绍瑞;浅议反贪侦查活动中的“以快制胜”[J];检察实践;2004年05期
3 张捷;方菁;;取保候审在反贪侦查中的适用现状与完善建议[J];福建法学;2009年02期
4 吴福民,吴大威;反贪侦查工作新问题及对策[J];上海市政法管理干部学院学报;1999年04期
5 徐卫东;;反贪侦查创新模式研究[J];法制与社会;2007年05期
6 苏玉华,杨善良;反贪侦查分工组合的新思路——依专业分工组合[J];检察实践;2000年01期
7 李强;;犯罪心理测试技术在侦查中的科学运用[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2009年01期
8 宋启文;;解放思想,应对新《律师法》给反贪侦查带来的挑战[J];法制与社会;2010年16期
9 叶俊青;;论检察机关的规范办案与保障嫌疑人权利[J];今日南国(中旬刊);2010年10期
10 张安平;运筹帷幄 规划未来——全国检察机关反贪污贿赂工作会议侧记[J];人民检察;1999年11期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 曾志刚;;无罪推定原则在侦查阶段的适用[A];第三届中国律师论坛论文集(实务卷)[C];2003年
2 杨先恒;;人性尊严与犯罪嫌疑人之刑事处遇[A];律师事业与和谐社会——第五届中国律师论坛优秀论文集[C];2005年
3 晏虹;;关于六盘水市中心城区“双抢”案件的调查与分析[A];贵州省科学社会主义暨政治学学会2006年年会论文集[C];2006年
4 戴富强;;浅议毒品案件中的证据问题[A];中国犯罪学研究会第十二届学术研讨会论文集[C];2003年
5 许象成;;投毒杀人案件的法医学鉴定[A];加入WTO和中国科技与可持续发展——挑战与机遇、责任和对策(下册)[C];2002年
6 潘峰;;论我国律师介入侦查阶段的困境与出路[A];使命与发展——第四届西部律师发展论坛论文集[C];2011年
7 李晓霞;王杰;;由一则案例引发的建立沉默权制度的思考[A];律师事业与和谐社会——第五届中国律师论坛优秀论文集[C];2005年
8 王兆峰;高洁;;刑事律师应注意的几个民事问题[A];规划·规范·规则——第六届中国律师论坛优秀论文集[C];2006年
9 阮海根;王仁新;张意平;彭超;;应用CHN法推断三种刑事责任年龄(附532例报告)[A];中国法医学会全国第九次法医临床学学术研讨会论文集[C];2006年
10 郭长铭;;应用Phastsystem(快速电泳系统)对命案现场微量血痕进行PGM_1酶型检验一例报告[A];第二次全国法医物证学学术交流会论文集[C];1998年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 最高人民检察院反贪总局 詹复亮;反贪侦查工作与律师权利的落实和保障[N];检察日报;2008年
2 李明耀 徐蔚敏;请人上门监督反贪侦查[N];检察日报;2007年
3 甘肃省检察院反贪局 高连城;从五个方面提高反贪侦查能力[N];今日信息报;2008年
4 赵秉志 肖中华;“如实供述自己罪行”的认定[N];检察日报;2001年
5 叶琦;“打黑除恶”专项斗争战果初显[N];蚌埠日报;2006年
6 韩进 本报记者 胡新平;站在百姓身边的人民警察[N];抚州日报;2007年
7 邢邦明 本报记者 张志宇;张静波:执法为兵演绎铁面人生[N];法制日报;2006年
8 林晖;认定“另有重要罪行”的标准应为逮捕标准[N];检察日报;2006年
9 梁洪邋邓彭生;广西罗城:人性化执法促嫌疑人悔罪[N];检察日报;2007年
10 刘义辉邋辜新成;委托亲友规劝他人自首可否认定为立功[N];检察日报;2007年
相关博士学位论文 前10条
1 于平;羁押审查程序要素论[D];吉林大学;2010年
2 张剑峰;逮捕制度新论[D];吉林大学;2013年
3 王天林;侦查行为侵权司法救济研究[D];山东大学;2011年
4 彭伶;不得强迫自证其罪原则研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
5 周凯东;检察环节刑事和解研究[D];吉林大学;2013年
6 叶宁;警察讯问话语[D];浙江大学;2010年
7 郭烁;刑事强制措施的体系及其适用研究[D];中国政法大学;2011年
8 黄新民;刑事诉讼法律伦理原理初论[D];中国政法大学;2011年
9 林雪标;腐败资产跨境追回问题研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
10 苏云;贿赂犯罪侦查研究[D];西南财经大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 林远明;犯罪嫌疑人知悉权研究[D];广东商学院;2010年
2 赵芳;公安机关刑事侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人人权保障研究[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2011年
3 范立娜;我国犯罪嫌疑人辩护权之探析[D];中国政法大学;2011年
4 张玲;论刑事侦查阶段犯罪嫌疑人权利保障[D];山东大学;2010年
5 李亚可;心理学视角下的侦查讯问谋略研究[D];西南政法大学;2010年
6 阮露玫;论审查起诉阶段犯罪嫌疑人知情权[D];华东政法大学;2010年
7 申玉军;论我国犯罪嫌疑人的辩护权[D];苏州大学;2006年
8 张霁霖;犯罪嫌疑人诉讼权利研究[D];湖南大学;2009年
9 王飞;论反贪侦查中的犯罪嫌疑人人权保障[D];华中师范大学;2012年
10 范慧慧;论逮捕必要性[D];西南政法大学;2010年
,本文编号:2153736
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2153736.html