一审判决效力与二审中的诉讼外和解协议——最高人民法院公布的2号指导案例评析

发布时间：2018-10-08 17:27

【摘要】：对指导案例2号归纳的程序规则,理论上可用"执行力替代说"来加以说明。引入诚实信用原则并明确其在法律解释中的作用亦为本案的靓点之一。指导性案例应当随时间的推移而呈现出系列性,使规则的流变和连续这两种司法实务的需要有机地结合起来。在此意义上,本案能够成为程序规则发展的一个起点或中间项。通过对案情基本事实多种演化形态的示例性延伸,本案程序规则的内容及其参照运用能够体现出微妙地调整变化却又保持前后一贯稳定性的独特机制和作用。本案所提炼出来的裁判规则既可能循着诚实信用原则的实质化、要件化这一路径发展,也可能根据司法实务中对"撤回上诉还是撤回原审起诉"的现实问题作出的回答而演变。对指导案例2号的分析表明,可以把"类似"或"参照"等对指导性案例制度具有重要意义的关键概念逐渐地加以具体化和类型化。
[Abstract]:The procedure rules of induction of guiding case No. 2 can be explained theoretically by "executive power substitution theory". The introduction of the principle of good faith and its role in legal interpretation is one of the highlights of the case. The guiding cases should show a series with the passage of time, so that the changes of rules and the needs of continuous judicial practice can be combined organically. In this sense, this case can become a starting point or intermediate item in the development of procedural rules. Through an example extension of the basic facts of the case, the contents of the procedural rules in this case and their referential application can reflect the unique mechanism and function of adjusting the changes subtly but maintaining the consistency and stability. The rule of decision abstracted in this case may not only follow the essence of the principle of good faith, but also evolve according to the practical answer to the question of "withdrawing appeal or withdrawing the prosecution of original trial" in judicial practice. The analysis of guiding case No. 2 shows that the key concepts such as "similarity" or "reference", which are important to the guiding case system, can be gradually concretized and typed.
【作者单位】：清华大学法学院;
【基金】：北京市支持中央在京高校共建项目“民事诉讼法修改与多元化争议解决机制的完善”的部分成果
【分类号】：D926.2

【共引文献】