网络舆论与法院审判
发布时间：2018-10-09 17:21
【摘要】：随着互联网这一新型媒体的发展，现代社会已经步入了“人人都有麦克风”的时代。互联网延伸了传统媒体的边界，丰富了传统媒体的表达形式，大大拉近了媒体与受众之间的距离。网络传媒不只是一种抽象的与公权相对应的社会力量，它还是民意的代言人，是社会舆论的载体，，是公民行使宪法赋予的监督权的重要渠道，是公民表达言论自由的重要平台。伴随着网络舆论对法院审判的高度关注，由于网络传媒以道德、习惯作为评判是非的标准，其所内含的非理性很可能影响甚至干涉法院的独立、公正审判。基于这样的背景，身处网络时代，如何实现网络舆论背后的言论自由与法院审判背后的公正审判两种价值的平衡，找寻二者之间的最佳契合点，显得尤为重要。 本文通过全面分析网络舆论对法院审判的影响，理性解读二者之间的复杂关系，并借鉴国外相关经验，最后，对于实现网络舆论与法院审判之间的良性互动笔者试着提出一些意见和建议。
[Abstract]:With the development of Internet, the modern society has entered the era of "everyone has microphone". Internet extends the boundary of traditional media, enriches the expression of traditional media, and draws the distance between media and audience. Network media is not only an abstract social force corresponding to public power, but also a spokesman for public opinion, a carrier of public opinion, an important channel for citizens to exercise their constitutional right of supervision, and an important platform for citizens to express their freedom of speech. Along with the network public opinion to the court trial high attention, because the network media regards the morals, the custom as the judgment right and wrong standard, it contains the irrational possibly to influence even interferes the court independence, the fair trial. Based on this background, how to realize the balance between the freedom of speech behind the network public opinion and the fair trial behind the court trial, and to find the best joint point between them, is particularly important in the network age. This paper analyzes the influence of network public opinion on the trial of the court, rationally interprets the complex relationship between the two, and draws lessons from the relevant experience of foreign countries. Finally, The author tries to put forward some opinions and suggestions to realize the benign interaction between network public opinion and court trial.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G206;D926.2
本文编号：2260147
[Abstract]:With the development of Internet, the modern society has entered the era of "everyone has microphone". Internet extends the boundary of traditional media, enriches the expression of traditional media, and draws the distance between media and audience. Network media is not only an abstract social force corresponding to public power, but also a spokesman for public opinion, a carrier of public opinion, an important channel for citizens to exercise their constitutional right of supervision, and an important platform for citizens to express their freedom of speech. Along with the network public opinion to the court trial high attention, because the network media regards the morals, the custom as the judgment right and wrong standard, it contains the irrational possibly to influence even interferes the court independence, the fair trial. Based on this background, how to realize the balance between the freedom of speech behind the network public opinion and the fair trial behind the court trial, and to find the best joint point between them, is particularly important in the network age. This paper analyzes the influence of network public opinion on the trial of the court, rationally interprets the complex relationship between the two, and draws lessons from the relevant experience of foreign countries. Finally, The author tries to put forward some opinions and suggestions to realize the benign interaction between network public opinion and court trial.
【学位授予单位】：苏州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：G206;D926.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 朱颖,陈小彪;新闻自由与审判独立[J];当代传播;2005年04期
2 公丕祥,刘敏;论司法公正的价值蕴含及制度保障[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1999年05期
3 马金芳;;人民法院立法建议在法律体系完善中的功能[J];法学;2011年08期
4 陈硕;;网络时代的媒介审判[J];江淮论坛;2010年05期
5 刘晖;;中国政治传播体制与政府的多层合法性结构[J];理论界;2009年03期
6 刘瑞华;司法权的基本特征[J];现代法学;2003年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 顾学松;寻求舆论监督与司法公正的平衡[D];吉林大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 杨岚;网上公共领域影响公共决策的路径研究[D];北京邮电大学;2010年
本文编号：2260147
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2260147.html
