我国量刑建议制度研究
发布时间:2018-11-16 18:41
【摘要】:从世界范围看,量刑建议适用的案件范围和数量呈现日益扩大的趋势,己经成为研究刑事诉讼不可回避的问题之一。而在我国,量刑建议改革是检察机关在深化公诉改革过程中提出的一个崭新课题,它的试行引起了社会各界的广泛关注。 司法改革,理论先行。因此,本文采用比较、分析、归纳等研究方法对量刑建议制度进行较为全面的探讨,为我国当前量刑建议实践中遇到的问题提供一些有效解决的思路和方法,以期对我国量刑建议制度的进一步完善进行更深层次的探讨和提出一些有益的建议 本文约三万四千字,分为四大部分。第一部分是对量刑建议制度的基础理论问题进行分析,包括量刑建议权的概念、属性、支撑理论及其价值。第二部分是对两大法系主要国家的量刑建议的立法和实践进行考察,分析他们的共同做法和不同法,同时通过对两大法系的比较,得出我国需要借鉴的一些有益经验。第三部分是对我国量刑建议制度立法与实践进行评析。第四部分则是对量刑建议制度的完善做出一定的构想,包括与量刑建议制度相配套的其他制度,以保证量刑建议制度有效运行和不断完善。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the world, the scope and the number of cases applied to the sentencing recommendations show an increasing trend, which has become one of the unavoidable problems in the study of criminal proceedings. In our country, the reform of sentencing suggestion is a new subject put forward by procuratorial organs in the process of deepening the reform of public prosecution, and its trial has aroused widespread concern from all walks of life. Judicial reform, theory first. Therefore, this paper uses comparative, analytical, inductive and other research methods to discuss the sentencing suggestion system in a more comprehensive way, and provides some effective solutions to the problems encountered in the practice of sentencing advice in our country. In order to further improve the sentencing recommendation system of our country to further explore and put forward some useful suggestions this paper is about 34000 words, divided into four parts. The first part is the analysis of the basic theory of sentencing suggestion system, including the concept, attributes, supporting theory and its value of sentencing suggestion right. The second part is to investigate the legislation and practice of sentencing recommendations of the two major legal system countries, analyze their common practices and different laws, at the same time, through the comparison of the two legal systems, we can draw some useful experiences that our country needs to learn from. The third part is to analyze the legislation and practice of sentencing suggestion system in China. The fourth part is to perfect the sentencing recommendation system to make a certain idea, including the sentencing advice system matching other systems, to ensure the effective operation and continuous improvement of sentencing recommendation system.
【学位授予单位】:海南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D925.2;D926
本文编号:2336319
[Abstract]:From the point of view of the world, the scope and the number of cases applied to the sentencing recommendations show an increasing trend, which has become one of the unavoidable problems in the study of criminal proceedings. In our country, the reform of sentencing suggestion is a new subject put forward by procuratorial organs in the process of deepening the reform of public prosecution, and its trial has aroused widespread concern from all walks of life. Judicial reform, theory first. Therefore, this paper uses comparative, analytical, inductive and other research methods to discuss the sentencing suggestion system in a more comprehensive way, and provides some effective solutions to the problems encountered in the practice of sentencing advice in our country. In order to further improve the sentencing recommendation system of our country to further explore and put forward some useful suggestions this paper is about 34000 words, divided into four parts. The first part is the analysis of the basic theory of sentencing suggestion system, including the concept, attributes, supporting theory and its value of sentencing suggestion right. The second part is to investigate the legislation and practice of sentencing recommendations of the two major legal system countries, analyze their common practices and different laws, at the same time, through the comparison of the two legal systems, we can draw some useful experiences that our country needs to learn from. The third part is to analyze the legislation and practice of sentencing suggestion system in China. The fourth part is to perfect the sentencing recommendation system to make a certain idea, including the sentencing advice system matching other systems, to ensure the effective operation and continuous improvement of sentencing recommendation system.
【学位授予单位】:海南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D925.2;D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 陈革,谢军;浅议量刑建议探索中的几个问题[J];人民检察;2003年08期
2 ;镇江市检察机关试行量刑建议制度的调研报告[J];人民检察;2003年09期
3 徐清;小议检察机关量刑建议权[J];犯罪研究;2005年04期
4 冀祥德;量刑建议权的理论基础与价值基础[J];烟台大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年03期
5 朱晓文;;关于赋予检察机关量刑建议权的思考——从许霆盗窃一案说起[J];政法学刊;2008年03期
6 龚培华,张少林;论检察机关的量刑请求权[J];中国刑事法杂志;2001年04期
7 王新清;李蓉;;技术推进与诉讼观念变革——写在《刑事诉讼法》修改之前[J];中国刑事法杂志;2005年01期
8 王军;吕卫华;;关于量刑建议的若干问题[J];国家检察官学院学报;2009年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前4条
1 灵川县人民检察院副检察长 秦奕明;[N];法治快报;2008年
2 密然;[N];检察日报;2004年
3 冀祥德;[N];检察日报;2006年
4 记者 徐日丹 实习生 段善策;[N];检察日报;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 潘怀香;检察机关量刑建议权研究[D];安徽大学;2007年
,本文编号:2336319
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2336319.html